Yilmaz Hale, Sayar Nurten, Yilmaz Mehmet, Tangürek Burak, Cakmak Nazmiye, Gürkan Ufuk, Gül Mehmet, Simşek Dilek, Bolca Osman
Dr. Siyami Ersek Göğüs Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi Eğitim ve Araştirma Hastanesi, Kardiyoloji Kliniği, Istanbul, Turkey.
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2008 Dec;36(8):530-5.
We investigated the prevalence, distribution, risk factors, and prognosis of coronary artery ectasia (CAE) in patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
Of 4,119 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography between 2003 and 2005, 173 patients (139 males, 34 females; mean age 61+/-11 years) had CAE, with a prevalence of 4.2%. Distribution of CAE was made according to the classification of Markis et al. The results were compared with those of 145 control patients (115 males, 30 males; mean age 61+/-10 years) who had CAD but not CAE. Following coronary angiography, treatment was designed as aortocoronary bypass (n=3), percutaneous coronary intervention (n=36), and medical therapy (n=98). The mean follow-up was 34.2+/-2.5 months.
Among CAE patients, there was a marked male preponderance with 80.3%. Coronary ectasia was isolated in 46 patients (26.6%) and was associated with significant coronary artery stenoses in 127 patients (73.4%). The only significant difference with the control group with respect to baseline features was the higher frequency of hypertension in the CAE group (p=0.002). Coronary ectasia involved a single vessel in 67.1%, two vessels in 24.9%, and three vessels in 8.1%, with the right coronary artery being the most common localization (50.9%). The diameters of ectatic coronary arteries ranged from 3.2 mm to 9.7 mm (mean 5.6 mm). According to the classification of Markis et al., the majority of patients (64.2%) had type IV ectasia. In multiple regression analysis, hypertension was independently associated with CAE (OR: 0.378; 95% CI: 0.211-0.678; p=0.001). Mortality occurred in nine patients (5.2%). The annual mortality rates were 1.5%, 2.1%, and 2.9% with medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, and aortocoronary bypass, respectively.
Our findings suggest that further prospective studies focus on the dependent relationship between hypertension and CAE, and on marked coexistence of CAD and CAE.
我们对疑似冠心病(CAD)而行冠状动脉造影的患者中冠状动脉扩张(CAE)的患病率、分布、危险因素及预后进行了研究。
在2003年至2005年间接受择期冠状动脉造影的4119例患者中,173例(139例男性,34例女性;平均年龄61±11岁)患有CAE,患病率为4.2%。CAE的分布根据Markis等人的分类进行。将结果与145例患有CAD但无CAE的对照患者(115例男性,30例女性;平均年龄61±10岁)的结果进行比较。冠状动脉造影后,治疗方案设计为主动脉冠状动脉搭桥术(n = 3)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(n = 36)和药物治疗(n = 98)。平均随访时间为34.2±2.5个月。
在CAE患者中,男性占比显著,为80.3%。46例患者(26.6%)为孤立性冠状动脉扩张,127例患者(73.4%)伴有显著冠状动脉狭窄。与对照组相比,CAE组在基线特征方面唯一的显著差异是高血压发生率更高(p = 0.002)。冠状动脉扩张累及单支血管的占67.1%,累及两支血管的占24.9%,累及三支血管的占8.1%,其中右冠状动脉是最常见的累及部位(50.9%)。扩张冠状动脉的直径范围为3.2毫米至9.7毫米(平均5.6毫米)。根据Markis等人的分类,大多数患者(64.2%)为IV型扩张。在多元回归分析中,高血压与CAE独立相关(OR:0.378;95%CI:0.211 - 0.678;p = 0.001)。9例患者(5.2%)死亡。药物治疗、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和主动脉冠状动脉搭桥术的年死亡率分别为1.5%、2.1%和2.9%。
我们的研究结果表明,进一步的前瞻性研究应聚焦于高血压与CAE之间的依赖关系,以及CAD与CAE的显著共存情况。