• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索临床医疗研究奖学金计划的可持续影响。

Exploring the sustainable impacts of a clinical healthcare research scholarship programme.

机构信息

Senior Nurse for Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research, and Clinical Director for Research, James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth; Honorary Fellow, University of East Anglia, Norwich; and Visiting Professor, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent.

Research Grants Advisor and Research Paramedic, James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, and Honorary Fellow, University of East Anglia, Norwich.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2024 Jun 6;33(11):515-521. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2024.0035.

DOI:10.12968/bjon.2024.0035
PMID:38850139
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The NHS is the first public body globally to commit to net zero.

AIM

This study aimed to explore the environmental sustainability impact of a hospital scholarship programme.

METHOD

A sustainable quality improvement value framework was used to measure the programme's environmental, social and financial effects.

RESULTS

The social impact through face-to-face contact was most valued by scholars; there were also savings in carbon emissions and costs.

DISCUSSION

Training in sustainability is essential for the workforce but little infrastructure and expertise are available within organisations to support staff to provide sustainable healthcare in day-to-day practice.

CONCLUSION

Sustainable healthcare should be supported by education and national guidance and implementation plans should be drawn up to this end. The social impact of the framework used is often seen as less important than its environmental and financial components; however, as its value to scholars illustrates, the components are intertwined and should be considered of equal importance.

摘要

背景

NHS 是全球第一个承诺实现净零排放的公共机构。

目的

本研究旨在探讨医院奖学金计划对环境可持续性的影响。

方法

采用可持续质量改进价值框架来衡量该计划的环境、社会和财务影响。

结果

学者们最看重通过面对面接触带来的社会效益;该计划还实现了碳排放量和成本的节约。

讨论

对员工进行可持续发展方面的培训至关重要,但组织内部几乎没有基础设施和专业知识来支持员工在日常实践中提供可持续的医疗服务。

结论

应通过教育和国家指导来支持可持续医疗,为此应制定实施计划。所使用框架的社会影响通常被认为不如其环境和财务部分重要;然而,正如其对学者的价值所表明的那样,这些组成部分是相互交织的,应被同等重视。

相似文献

1
Exploring the sustainable impacts of a clinical healthcare research scholarship programme.探索临床医疗研究奖学金计划的可持续影响。
Br J Nurs. 2024 Jun 6;33(11):515-521. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2024.0035.
2
Child and adolescent mental health services in a devolved healthcare system: a qualitative exploration of sustainable practices.分权医疗体系中的儿童和青少年心理健康服务:可持续实践的定性探索。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Apr 5;21(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00970-2.
3
Rural Allied Health Scholarships: do they make a difference?农村联合健康奖学金:它们有作用吗?
Rural Remote Health. 2013 Oct-Dec;13(4):2459. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
4
Sustainability in quality improvement (SusQI): a case-study in undergraduate medical education.质量改进中的可持续性(SusQI):本科医学教育中的案例研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 12;21(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02817-2.
5
Using the making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research (VICTOR) questionnaire to evaluate the benefits of a fellowship programme for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.使用可见研究影响(VICTOR)问卷评估护士、助产士和联合健康专业人员奖学金计划的收益。
Nurse Res. 2023 Dec 7;31(4):30-37. doi: 10.7748/nr.2023.e1864. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
7
Sustainable quality improvement: An essential ingredient for sustainability in modern medical curricula?可持续质量改进:现代医学课程可持续性的必要组成部分?
Clin Teach. 2024 Oct;21(5):e13776. doi: 10.1111/tct.13776. Epub 2024 May 7.
8
Scotland's GP paediatric scholarship: an evaluation.
Educ Prim Care. 2018 May;29(3):166-169. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2018.1427002. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
9
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
10
Rapid evaluation of the Special Measures for Quality and challenged provider regimes: a mixed-methods study.快速评估质量特别措施和有问题的供应商制度:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(19):1-139. doi: 10.3310/GQQV3512.