• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用可见研究影响(VICTOR)问卷评估护士、助产士和联合健康专业人员奖学金计划的收益。

Using the making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research (VICTOR) questionnaire to evaluate the benefits of a fellowship programme for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.

机构信息

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, England.

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, England.

出版信息

Nurse Res. 2023 Dec 7;31(4):30-37. doi: 10.7748/nr.2023.e1864. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

DOI:10.7748/nr.2023.e1864
PMID:37795565
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increasing emphasis in the UK on developing a nurse, midwife and allied health professional (NMAHP) workforce that conducts research. Training for clinical academic careers is provided by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). However, the low number of successful applicants suggested there were barriers to achieving this. The Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Led Research (CNMR) launched a fellowship programme in 2016 to backfill two days a week of NMAHPs' time for up to a year, to give them time to make competitive applications to the NIHR.

AIM

To report a study evaluating the CNMR fellowship programme.

DISCUSSION

The making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research (VICTOR) tool ( Cooke et al 2019 ) was developed to describe the organisational impact of research. The 2016-17 CNMR fellows completed VICTOR and their responses were analysed using a framework approach. The analysis found the main benefits of participating in the programme were protected time for research, opportunities to develop collaborations, increasing intra- and inter-professional awareness of NMAHPs' research, peer-reviewed publications, and conference presentations. Challenges included a lack of support from line managers, limited value placed on NMAHPs' research and failure to backfill posts.

CONCLUSION

There were some challenges with the fellowship programme, but all recipients found it to be a positive experience and undertook significant scholarly activity.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A contractual agreement must be established to foster committed partnerships between higher education institutions (HEIs) and the NHS. HEIs and the NHS should conduct frank discussions of the challenges encountered in fellowship programmes. Positive initiatives and outcomes in tertiary education and clinical settings should be shared to improve fellows' experiences and enhance partnerships between HEIs and the NHS. Job descriptions should include time allocation to review fellowship candidates' applications regardless of outcome. The showcasing of research successes and the benefits of NMAHP research must evolve to secure organisational 'buy in', which is the precursor to widening access to clinical academic pathways.

摘要

背景

英国越来越重视培养从事研究的护士、助产士和联合保健专业人员(NMAHP)。国家卫生与保健研究学院(NIHR)提供临床学术职业培训。然而,成功申请者的数量较少表明存在障碍。护理和助产领导的研究中心(CNMR)于 2016 年推出了一项研究员计划,在最多一年的时间内每周为 NMAHPs 腾出两天时间,让他们有时间向 NIHR 提出有竞争力的申请。

目的

报告一项评估 CNMR 研究员计划的研究。

讨论

Cooke 等人开发的可见研究影响(VICTOR)工具(2019 年)用于描述研究的组织影响。2016-17 年的 CNMR 研究员完成了 VICTOR,他们的回应使用框架方法进行了分析。分析发现,参与该计划的主要好处是为研究提供了受保护的时间、发展合作的机会、增加 NMAHPs 对研究的内部和跨专业认识、同行评议的出版物和会议演讲。挑战包括来自直线经理的支持不足、对 NMAHPs 研究的重视有限以及未能填补职位。

结论

研究员计划存在一些挑战,但所有受助人都认为这是一次积极的经历,并进行了大量的学术活动。

对实践的影响

必须建立高等教育机构(HEIs)和 NHS 之间的合作协议,以培养坚定的合作伙伴关系。HEIs 和 NHS 应坦率讨论研究员计划中遇到的挑战。应分享高等教育和临床环境中的积极举措和成果,以改善研究员的经验并加强 HEIs 和 NHS 之间的伙伴关系。工作描述应包括分配时间来审查研究员候选人的申请,无论结果如何。必须展示研究成果和 NMAHP 研究的好处,以确保组织“认同”,这是拓宽临床学术途径的前提。

相似文献

1
Using the making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research (VICTOR) questionnaire to evaluate the benefits of a fellowship programme for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.使用可见研究影响(VICTOR)问卷评估护士、助产士和联合健康专业人员奖学金计划的收益。
Nurse Res. 2023 Dec 7;31(4):30-37. doi: 10.7748/nr.2023.e1864. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Enablers and barriers to progressing a clinical academic career in nursing, midwifery and allied health professions: A cross-sectional survey.护理、助产及相关健康专业临床学术职业发展的促进因素与障碍:一项横断面调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Feb;31(3-4):406-416. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15673. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
3
A mixed-methods study of challenges and benefits of clinical academic careers for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.一项关于护士、助产士和专职医疗人员临床学术职业的挑战与益处的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e030595. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030595.
4
An evaluation of the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals 4Ps Programme for the development of nurses, midwives and allied healthcare professionals' research skills.对泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔医院的 4Ps 计划的评估,该计划旨在发展护士、助产士和联合保健专业人员的研究技能。
Nurse Res. 2024 Sep 11;32(3):9-16. doi: 10.7748/nr.2024.e1915. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
5
Capitalising on the transformational opportunities of early clinical academic career training for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.充分利用护士、助产士和 临床医生职业培训的变革机会。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02348-2.
6
Embedding research (ER) led by nurses, midwives and allied health professionals (NMAHPs): the NMAHP-ER model.由护士、助产士和专职医疗人员主导的嵌入式研究(ER):NMAHP-ER 模式。
BMJ Lead. 2022 Dec;6(4):323-326. doi: 10.1136/leader-2021-000578. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
7
Clinical academic research internships: What works for nurses and the wider nursing, midwifery and allied health professional workforce.临床学术研究实习:对护士以及更广泛的护理、助产和联合健康专业人员队伍有效的方法。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Feb;31(3-4):318-328. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15611. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
8
Increasing nursing and midwifery research leadership: impact evaluation of the National Institute for Health and Care Research Senior Nurse and Midwife Research Leader Programme at 1 year.提升护理与助产领域的研究领导力:对英国国家卫生与保健研究院高级护士及助产士研究领袖计划1年期影响的评估
J Res Nurs. 2023 Nov;28(6-7):516-528. doi: 10.1177/17449871231201550. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
9
An Academic Midwifery Fellowship: Addressing a Need for Junior Faculty Development and Interprofessional Education.学术助产士奖学金:满足初级教师发展和跨专业教育的需求。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 May;65(3):370-375. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13116. Epub 2020 May 18.
10
Programmatic details and outcomes of an Academic-Practice Research Fellowship for clinical nurses.临床护士学术实践研究奖学金的方案细节和成果。
Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Oct;55:151296. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151296. Epub 2020 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming the experience in nursing and midwifery research - Quarantine Research Time Program (QRTP).变革护理与助产研究体验——隔离研究时间计划(QRTP)。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 28;24(1):975. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03584-x.
2
Do Jointly Appointed Nursing and Midwifery Clinical Academics Provide Benefits to Patients, Individual Joint Appointees, Academic Institutions and Health and Social Care Organisations? A Scoping Literature Review.联合任命的护理与助产临床学者是否能为患者、个体联合任命人员、学术机构以及健康与社会护理组织带来益处?一项范围界定文献综述。
Nurs Open. 2025 May;12(5):e70227. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70227.
3
Mental Health Nurses' and Allied Health Professionals' Individual Research Capacity and Organizational Research Culture: A Comparative Study.
精神科护士与专职医疗专业人员的个人研究能力及组织研究文化:一项比较研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 May 13;10:23779608241250207. doi: 10.1177/23779608241250207. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.