文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

探索通过数字平台使患者参与其健康数据的潜在驱动因素:范围综述。

Exploring potential drivers of patient engagement with their health data through digital platforms: A scoping review.

机构信息

LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom; Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; Digital Public Health Task Force, Association of School of Public Health in the European Region (ASPHER), Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2024 Sep;189:105513. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105513. Epub 2024 Jun 5.


DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105513
PMID:38851132
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient engagement when providing patient access to health data results from an interaction between the available tools and individual capabilities. The recent digital advancements of the healthcare field have altered the manifestation and importance of patient engagement. However, a comprehensive assessment of what factors contribute to patient engagement remain absent. In this review article, we synthesised the most frequently discussed factors that can foster patient engagement with their health data. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar. Relevant data were synthesized within 7 layers using a thematic analysis: (1) social and demographic factors, (2) patient ability factors, (3) patient motivation factors, (4) factors related to healthcare professionals' attitudes and skills, (5) health system factors, (6) technological factors, and (7) policy factors. RESULTS: We identified 5801 academic and 200 Gy literature records, and included 292 (4.83%) in this review. Overall, 44 factors that can affect patient engagement with their health data were extracted. We extracted 6 social and demographic factors, 6 patient ability factors, 12 patient motivation factors, 7 factors related to healthcare professionals' attitudes and skills, 4 health system factors, 6 technological factors, and 3 policy factors. CONCLUSIONS: Improving patient engagement with their health data enables the development of patient-centered healthcare, though it can also exacerbate existing inequities. While expanding patient access to health data is an important step towards fostering shared decision-making in healthcare and subsequently empowering patients, it is important to ensure that these developments reach all sectors of the community.

摘要

背景:在为患者提供获取健康数据的途径时,患者参与源于可用工具和个体能力之间的相互作用。最近医疗保健领域的数字化进步改变了患者参与的表现形式和重要性。然而,对于促成患者参与其健康数据的因素的全面评估仍然缺失。在这篇综述文章中,我们综合了最常讨论的可以促进患者参与其健康数据的因素。

方法:在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Google Scholar 中进行了范围综述。使用主题分析在 7 个层面内综合相关数据:(1)社会人口因素,(2)患者能力因素,(3)患者动机因素,(4)与医疗保健专业人员态度和技能相关的因素,(5)卫生系统因素,(6)技术因素,(7)政策因素。

结果:我们确定了 5801 篇学术文献和 200 篇灰色文献记录,并将其中的 292 篇纳入本综述。总体而言,提取出了 44 个可能影响患者参与其健康数据的因素。我们提取了 6 个社会人口因素、6 个患者能力因素、12 个患者动机因素、7 个与医疗保健专业人员态度和技能相关的因素、4 个卫生系统因素、6 个技术因素和 3 个政策因素。

结论:提高患者对其健康数据的参与度可以促进以患者为中心的医疗保健的发展,但也可能加剧现有的不平等现象。尽管扩大患者对健康数据的访问权限是促进医疗保健中共同决策并进而赋予患者权力的重要步骤,但确保这些发展惠及社区的所有阶层也很重要。

相似文献

[1]
Exploring potential drivers of patient engagement with their health data through digital platforms: A scoping review.

Int J Med Inform. 2024-9

[2]
Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience.

Health Expect. 2021-12

[3]
Barriers and facilitators to health professionals' engagement in quality improvement initiatives: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Int J Qual Health Care. 2024-5-21

[4]
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.

JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012

[5]
Patient-Oriented Research Competencies in Health (PORCH) for patients, healthcare providers, decision-makers and researchers: protocol of a scoping review.

Syst Rev. 2018-7-19

[6]
Application of a Sociotechnical Framework to Uncover Factors That Influence Effective User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Tools in Clinical Care Contexts: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-4-28

[7]
From hesitation to participation: a narrative review of facilitators and barriers for healthcare professionals' engagement in medical education research.

BMC Med Educ. 2025-2-25

[8]
Healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitude and its associated factors toward electronic personal health record system in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study.

Front Public Health. 2023

[9]
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-2-18

[10]
Understanding patient engagement in health system decision-making: a co-designed scoping review.

Syst Rev. 2019-4-18

引用本文的文献

[1]
Engagement and attrition in digital mental health: current challenges and potential solutions.

NPJ Digit Med. 2025-7-2

[2]
LLMonFHIR: A Physician-Validated, Large Language Model-Based Mobile Application for Querying Patient Electronic Health Data.

JACC Adv. 2025-5-14

[3]
Experiences of Older Mental Health Patients and Their Care Partners Using a Proxy Account to Access Open Notes: Qualitative Interview Study.

JMIR Aging. 2025-2-24

[4]
A scoping review and expert consensus on digital determinants of health.

Bull World Health Organ. 2025-2-1

[5]
Predictive testing for Huntington's disease in a digital age; patient power with potential pitfalls.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2025-1-29

[6]
Mapping the regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence in health within the European Union.

NPJ Digit Med. 2024-8-27

[7]
Understanding factors impacting patient-reported outcome measures integration in routine clinical practice: an umbrella review.

Qual Life Res. 2024-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索