Smith Katharine A, Ward Thomas, Lambe Sinéad, Ostinelli Edoardo G, Blease Charlotte, Gant Thomas, Gold Stefan M, Holmes Emily A, Paccoud Ivana, Vinnikova Anastasia, Klucken Jochen, Uhlhaas Peter J, Sanchez Carolina Garcia, Haining Kate, Böge Kerem, Lahutina Sofiia, Tomelleri Luisa, Ryan Sean, Torous John, Cipriani Andrea
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 2;8(1):398. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01778-w.
In digital mental health engagement rates are consistently low, which may limit its effects. Using an international multidisciplinary consensus method, including lived experience expertise and a systematic review, we identified three key challenges: (i) lack of agreed metrics for engagement; (ii) lack of evidence on how better engagement improves outcomes; (iii) lack of standards for user involvement. Three potential solutions encompassed: (i) standardisation of frameworks for reporting engagement metrics and optimal doses of digital tools, (ii) measuring engagement with more precise reporting of outcomes, including potential harms; (iii) defining standards of user involvement (including appropriate diversity, and clinician as well as user input). Digital interventions have real potential in meeting the shortfall in service provision for mental health, but this will require focus on high quality research studies of the underlying mechanisms of engagement and optimal outcomes. Our findings identify and highlight the next best steps in this process.
在数字心理健康领域,参与率一直很低,这可能会限制其效果。我们采用国际多学科共识方法,包括实际经验专业知识和系统评价,确定了三个关键挑战:(i)缺乏关于参与的商定指标;(ii)缺乏关于更好的参与如何改善结果的证据;(iii)缺乏用户参与的标准。三个潜在解决方案包括:(i)报告参与指标和数字工具最佳使用剂量的框架标准化;(ii)通过更精确地报告结果(包括潜在危害)来衡量参与度;(iii)定义用户参与的标准(包括适当的多样性以及临床医生和用户的投入)。数字干预在弥补心理健康服务提供不足方面具有真正潜力,但这需要专注于对参与的潜在机制和最佳结果进行高质量的研究。我们的研究结果确定并突出了这一过程中的下一个最佳步骤。