Suppr超能文献

增强超声(CEUS)作为肾肿瘤局部治疗后的随访方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a follow-up method after the focal treatment of renal tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.

Department of Public Health and Healthcare, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Nov;56(11):3415-3426. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04102-9. Epub 2024 Jun 8.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a cost-effective radiation-free diagnostic method that can be used for renal tumor postoperative visualization after ablative treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To assess CEUS diagnostic accuracy comparing with CT and MRI as a follow-up method in short-term and long-term postoperative periods after renal tumor ablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in Scopus and Medline databases using the query "(kidney OR rena* OR RCC) AND (ablation OR RFA OR MWA OR cryo*) AND CEUS". The endpoint of the study was the evaluation of the overall accuracy of CEUS.

RESULTS

Twelve trials were included in the review. With CT or MRI as a reference, for a short-term group (< 6 weeks after ablation) pooled sensitivity was 90.2%, I = 0%; pooled specificity was 99.3%, I = 0%; pooled NPV was 98.6%, I = 0%; pooled PPV was 94.6%, I = 0%; the AUC on the SROC curve was 0.971. For the long-term group (> 6 weeks after ablation), pooled sensitivity was 95.3%, I = 0%; pooled specificity was 97.6%, I = 0%; PPV was 74.2%, I = 4%; NPV was 99.4%, I = 5%; AUC = 0.93.

CONCLUSION

CEUS has high sensitivity and specificity in ruling out the presence of local recurrence after renal tumor ablation with a higher risk of false-positive results within follow-up > 6 weeks compared with that for CT or MRI. Further studies with a unified protocol and morphological control of local renal tumor recurrence after ablation are needed.

摘要

背景

超声造影(CEUS)是一种具有成本效益且无辐射的诊断方法,可用于消融治疗后肾肿瘤术后的可视化。

目的

评估 CEUS 在肾肿瘤消融术后短期和长期随访中的诊断准确性,并与 CT 和 MRI 进行比较。

材料与方法

在 Scopus 和 Medline 数据库中进行了系统性回顾和荟萃分析,使用的查询词为“(kidney OR rena* OR RCC) AND (ablation OR RFA OR MWA OR cryo*) AND CEUS”。本研究的终点是评估 CEUS 的总体准确性。

结果

共有 12 项试验纳入本综述。以 CT 或 MRI 为参考标准,短期组(消融后<6 周)的汇总敏感度为 90.2%,I²=0%;汇总特异度为 99.3%,I²=0%;汇总阴性预测值为 98.6%,I²=0%;汇总阳性预测值为 94.6%,I²=0%;SROC 曲线下面积为 0.971。对于长期组(消融后>6 周),汇总敏感度为 95.3%,I²=0%;汇总特异度为 97.6%,I²=0%;阳性预测值为 74.2%,I²=4%;阴性预测值为 99.4%,I²=5%;曲线下面积为 0.93。

结论

CEUS 对排除肾肿瘤消融后局部复发具有较高的敏感度和特异度,但在随访>6 周时,其假阳性结果的风险高于 CT 或 MRI。需要进一步开展具有统一方案和局部肾肿瘤消融后形态学对照的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验