Suppr超能文献

经皮介入与手术治疗股总动脉病变的比较:前瞻性、多中心、随机 PESTO-CFA 试验研究方案。

Percutaneous intervention versus surgery in the treatment of common femoral artery lesions: study protocol for the prospective, multi-center, randomized PESTO-CFA trial.

机构信息

Department of Angiology, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Jun 8;25(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08219-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy has become established as a first-line therapy in most arterial regions. However, open vascular surgery (endarterectomy) remains the treatment of choice for common femoral artery (CFA) lesions. The aim of this study is to investigate the acute and mid-term results of directional atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon (DCB) in comparison to endarterectomy in treatment of de novo arteriosclerotic CFA lesions.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, multicenter non-inferiority study will enroll 306 participants with symptomatic (Rutherford category 1 to 5) de novo stenosis of the CFA including the bifurcation. Patients eligible for both treatment groups could be included in this 1:1 randomized trial. Primary efficacy endpoint is patency of the target lesion at 12 months defined as restenosis < 50% without the need of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR). Primary safety endpoint is a combined endpoint including death, myocardial infarction, major or minor amputation of the target limb, and peri-procedural complications at 30 days. Secondary endpoints include primary patency of the target lesion at 6 and 24 months, secondary patency, cdTLR 6, 12, and 24 months, change in ankle-brachial index, and Rutherford-Becker class at 6, 12, and 24 months. Limb salvage, change in quality of life measured by Walking Impairment Questionnaire, and major adverse events including death, myocardial infarction, and minor or major amputation of the target limb will be determined at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

DISCUSSION

Endovascular treatment of CFA lesions is still a matter of debate. Few studies compared modern endovascular therapy methods against the so-called gold standard surgical endarterectomy so far. Based on recent positive results, this study aims to confirm non-inferiority of a "leaving nothing behind" endovascular approach combining directional atherectomy and DCB compared to surgical therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02517827.

摘要

背景

血管内治疗已成为大多数动脉区域的一线治疗方法。然而,开放性血管手术(内膜切除术)仍然是股总动脉(CFA)病变的首选治疗方法。本研究旨在探讨经皮腔内血管成形术(腔内血管成形术)联合药物涂层球囊(DCB)治疗新发动脉粥样硬化性 CFA 病变的急性和中期结果,并与内膜切除术进行比较。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、多中心非劣效性研究,将纳入 306 名有症状(Rutherford 1 至 5 级)新发 CFA 狭窄(包括分叉处)的患者。符合两组治疗条件的患者可纳入本 1:1 随机试验。主要疗效终点为 12 个月时靶病变通畅率,定义为再狭窄<50%,无需临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(cdTLR)。主要安全性终点是包括 30 天内死亡、心肌梗死、目标肢体大或小截肢以及围手术期并发症在内的复合终点。次要终点包括 6 个月和 24 个月时的靶病变一期通畅率、二期通畅率、cdTLR 6、12 和 24 个月、踝肱指数变化以及 6、12 和 24 个月时的 Rutherford-Becker 分级。保肢率、行走障碍问卷(Walking Impairment Questionnaire)测量的生活质量变化、6、12、24 和 36 个月时的主要不良事件(包括死亡、心肌梗死以及目标肢体的小或大截肢)也将被确定。

讨论

CFA 病变的血管内治疗仍然存在争议。到目前为止,很少有研究比较现代血管内治疗方法与所谓的金标准手术内膜切除术。基于最近的阳性结果,本研究旨在证实“无遗留”的腔内治疗方法(联合经皮腔内血管成形术和 DCB)与手术治疗相比的非劣效性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02517827。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/980c/11162007/4acd89cab866/13063_2024_8219_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验