Mota Lucio F M, Giannuzzi Diana, Pegolo Sara, Toledo-Alvarado Hugo, Schiavon Stefano, Gallo Luigi, Trevisi Erminio, Arazi Alon, Katz Gil, Rosa Guilherme J M, Cecchinato Alessio
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Legnaro, Padova, 35020, Italy.
Department of Genetics and Biostatistics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico.
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2024 Jun 9;15(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40104-024-01042-3.
Various blood metabolites are known to be useful indicators of health status in dairy cattle, but their routine assessment is time-consuming, expensive, and stressful for the cows at the herd level. Thus, we evaluated the effectiveness of combining in-line near infrared (NIR) milk spectra with on-farm (days in milk [DIM] and parity) and genetic markers for predicting blood metabolites in Holstein cattle. Data were obtained from 388 Holstein cows from a farm with an AfiLab system. NIR spectra, on-farm information, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) markers were blended to develop calibration equations for blood metabolites using the elastic net (ENet) approach, considering 3 models: (1) Model 1 (M1) including only NIR information, (2) Model 2 (M2) with both NIR and on-farm information, and (3) Model 3 (M3) combining NIR, on-farm and genomic information. Dimension reduction was considered for M3 by preselecting SNP markers from genome-wide association study (GWAS) results.
Results indicate that M2 improved the predictive ability by an average of 19% for energy-related metabolites (glucose, cholesterol, NEFA, BHB, urea, and creatinine), 20% for liver function/hepatic damage, 7% for inflammation/innate immunity, 24% for oxidative stress metabolites, and 23% for minerals compared to M1. Meanwhile, M3 further enhanced the predictive ability by 34% for energy-related metabolites, 32% for liver function/hepatic damage, 22% for inflammation/innate immunity, 42.1% for oxidative stress metabolites, and 41% for minerals, compared to M1. We found improved predictive ability of M3 using selected SNP markers from GWAS results using a threshold of > 2.0 by 5% for energy-related metabolites, 9% for liver function/hepatic damage, 8% for inflammation/innate immunity, 22% for oxidative stress metabolites, and 9% for minerals. Slight reductions were observed for phosphorus (2%), ferric-reducing antioxidant power (1%), and glucose (3%). Furthermore, it was found that prediction accuracies are influenced by using more restrictive thresholds (-log(P-value) > 2.5 and 3.0), with a lower increase in the predictive ability.
Our results highlighted the potential of combining several sources of information, such as genetic markers, on-farm information, and in-line NIR infrared data improves the predictive ability of blood metabolites in dairy cattle, representing an effective strategy for large-scale in-line health monitoring in commercial herds.
各种血液代谢物是奶牛健康状况的有用指标,但在畜群水平上对其进行常规评估既耗时、昂贵,又会给奶牛带来压力。因此,我们评估了将在线近红外(NIR)牛奶光谱与农场信息(泌乳天数[DIM]和胎次)以及基因标记相结合来预测荷斯坦奶牛血液代谢物的有效性。数据来自一个使用AfiLab系统的农场的388头荷斯坦奶牛。将近红外光谱、农场信息和单核苷酸多态性(SNP)标记混合,使用弹性网络(ENet)方法为血液代谢物建立校准方程,考虑3种模型:(1)模型1(M1)仅包括近红外信息;(2)模型2(M2)包含近红外和农场信息;(3)模型3(M3)结合近红外、农场和基因组信息。通过从全基因组关联研究(GWAS)结果中预先选择SNP标记,对M3进行降维。
结果表明,与M1相比,M2使能量相关代谢物(葡萄糖、胆固醇、非酯化脂肪酸、β-羟基丁酸、尿素和肌酐)的预测能力平均提高了19%,肝功能/肝损伤的预测能力提高了20%,炎症/先天免疫的预测能力提高了7%,氧化应激代谢物的预测能力提高了24%,矿物质的预测能力提高了23%。同时,与M1相比,M3使能量相关代谢物的预测能力进一步提高了34%,肝功能/肝损伤的预测能力提高了32%,炎症/先天免疫的预测能力提高了22%,氧化应激代谢物的预测能力提高了42.1%,矿物质的预测能力提高了41%。我们发现,使用GWAS结果中阈值>2.0的选定SNP标记,M3对能量相关代谢物的预测能力提高了5%,肝功能/肝损伤的预测能力提高了9%;炎症/先天免疫的预测能力提高了8%,氧化应激代谢物的预测能力提高了22%,矿物质的预测能力提高了9%。磷(2%)、铁还原抗氧化能力(1%)和葡萄糖(3%)略有下降。此外,发现使用更严格的阈值(-log(P值)>2.5和3.0)会影响预测准确性,预测能力的提升幅度较小。
我们的结果突出了结合多种信息来源(如基因标记、农场信息和在线近红外数据)的潜力,提高了奶牛血液代谢物的预测能力,这是商业畜群大规模在线健康监测的有效策略。