Human Effectiveness Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory.
Human Systems Engineering, Center for Human, Artificial Intelligence, and Robot Teaming, Arizona State University.
Top Cogn Sci. 2024 Jul;16(3):377-390. doi: 10.1111/tops.12744. Epub 2024 Jun 9.
Teams are a fundamental aspect of life-from sports to business, to defense, to science, to education. While the cognitive sciences tend to focus on information processing within individuals, others have argued that teams are also capable of demonstrating cognitive capacities similar to humans, such as skill acquisition and forgetting (cf., Cooke, Gorman, Myers, & Duran, 2013; Fiore et al., 2010). As artificially intelligent and autonomous systems improve in their ability to learn, reason, interact, and coordinate with human teammates combined with the observation that teams can express cognitive capacities typically seen in individuals, a cognitive science of teams is emerging. Consequently, new questions are being asked about teams regarding teamness, trust, the introduction and effects of autonomous systems on teams, and how best to measure team behavior and phenomena. In this topic, four facets of human-autonomy team cognition are introduced with leaders in the field providing in-depth articles associated with one or more of the facets: (1) defining teams; (2) how trust is established, maintained, and repaired when broken; (3) autonomous systems operating as teammates; and (4) metrics for evaluating team cognition across communication, coordination, and performance.
团队是生活中不可或缺的一部分——从体育到商业、国防、科学到教育。虽然认知科学往往专注于个体内部的信息处理，但也有人认为团队也能够展示出类似于人类的认知能力，例如技能的获得和遗忘（例如，Cooke、Gorman、Myers 和 Duran，2013；Fiore 等人，2010）。随着人工智能和自主系统在学习、推理、交互和与人类队友协调方面的能力不断提高，加上观察到团队可以表达通常在个体中看到的认知能力，团队的认知科学正在出现。因此，关于团队的团队性、信任、自主系统对团队的引入和影响以及如何最好地衡量团队行为和现象等问题，正在提出新的问题。在这个主题中，介绍了人类-自主团队认知的四个方面，该领域的领导者提供了与一个或多个方面相关的深入文章：（1）定义团队；（2）当信任被打破时如何建立、维护和修复信任；（3）作为队友的自主系统；以及（4）用于评估团队在沟通、协调和绩效方面的认知的指标。
