Recovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, USA.
Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, USA.
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Sep;164:209435. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209435. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
Improved knowledge of factors that influence treatment engagement could help treatment providers and systems better engage patients. The present study used machine learning to explore associations between individual- and neighborhood-level factors, and SUD treatment engagement.
This was a secondary analysis of the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) dataset and United States Census Bureau data utilizing random forest machine learning and generalized linear mixed modelling. Our sample (N = 15,873) included all people entering SUD treatment at GAIN sites from 2006 to 2012. Predictors included an array of demographic, psychosocial, treatment-specific, and clinical measures, as well as environment-level measures for the neighborhood in which patients received treatment.
Greater odds of treatment engagement were predicted by adolescent age and psychiatric comorbidity, and at the neighborhood-level, by low unemployment and high population density. Lower odds of treatment engagement were predicted by Black/African American race, and at the neighborhood-level by high rate of public assistance and high income inequality. Regardless of the degree of treatment engagement, individuals receiving treatment in areas with high unemployment, alcohol sale outlet concentration, and poverty had greater substance use and related problems at baseline. Although these differences reduced with treatment and over time, disparities remained.
Neighborhood-level factors appear to play an important role in SUD treatment engagement. Regardless of whether individuals engage with treatment, greater loading on social determinants of health such as unemployment, alcohol sale outlet density, and poverty in the therapeutic landscape are associated with worse SUD treatment outcomes.
更好地了解影响治疗参与的因素可以帮助治疗提供者和系统更好地让患者参与治疗。本研究使用机器学习探索个体和社区层面的因素与物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗参与之间的关联。
这是对全球个体需求评估(GAIN)数据集和美国人口普查局数据的二次分析,利用随机森林机器学习和广义线性混合模型进行分析。我们的样本(N=15873)包括 2006 年至 2012 年期间在 GAIN 点接受 SUD 治疗的所有人。预测因素包括一系列人口统计学、心理社会、治疗特异性和临床指标,以及患者接受治疗的社区的环境水平指标。
青少年年龄和精神共病、低失业率和高人口密度等个体层面因素,以及低失业率和高人口密度等社区层面因素,预示着更高的治疗参与几率。黑人和非洲裔美国人种族以及社区层面的高公共援助率和高收入不平等预示着较低的治疗参与几率。无论治疗参与程度如何,在失业率高、酒精销售点集中和贫困的地区接受治疗的个体在基线时的物质使用和相关问题更严重。尽管这些差异随着治疗和时间的推移而减少,但差距仍然存在。
社区层面的因素似乎在 SUD 治疗参与中起着重要作用。无论个体是否参与治疗,在治疗环境中,如失业、酒精销售点密度和贫困等社会决定因素的负担越大,SUD 治疗结果越差。