Zhang Yucong, Liu Man, Li Jiajun, Ruan Lei, Wu Xiaofen, Zhang Cuntai, Chen Liangkai
Department of Geriatrics, Institute of Gerontology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Key Laboratory of Vascular Aging, Ministry of Education, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024 Aug;15(4):1463-1472. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13499. Epub 2024 Jun 9.
Cross-sectional evidence suggests a possible link between frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF). It remains unclear whether frailty and incident arrhythmias are longitudinally associated. This study aimed to determine whether the frailty phenotype is longitudinally associated with incident arrhythmias, especially AF.
In this prospective cohort of UK Biobank, individuals with arrhythmias at baseline, those without data for frailty phenotype, and no genetic data were excluded. Five domains of physical frailty, including weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, low grip strength, and slow gait speed, were assessed. A total of 142 single-nucleotide polymorphisms was used to calculate the polygenic risk score (PRS) for AF. Hospital inpatient records and death records were used to identify incident arrhythmias.
This study included 464 154 middle-aged and older adults (mean age 56.4 ± 8.1 years, 54.7% female) without arrhythmia at baseline. During a median follow-up of 13.4 years (over 5.9 million person-years), 46 454 new-onset arrhythmias cases were recorded. In comparison with non-frailty, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of AF were 1.12 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.15, P < 0.0001) and 1.44 (95% CI: 1.36, 1.51, P < 0.0001) for participants with pre-frailty and frailty, respectively. Similar associations were observed for other arrhythmias. We found that slow gait speed presented the strongest risk factor in predicting all arrhythmias, including AF (HR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.39), bradyarrhythmias (HR 1.30, 95% CI: 1.22, 1.37), conduction system diseases (HR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.22, 1.36), supraventricular arrhythmias (HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.47), and ventricular arrhythmias (HR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.25, 1.51), with all P values <0.0001. In addition to slow gait speed, weight loss (HR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.16, P < 0.0001) and exhaustion (HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.14, P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with incident AF, whereas insignificant associations were observed for physical activity (HR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.996, 1.08, P = 0.099) and low grip strength (HR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.03, P = 0.89). We observed a significant interaction between genetic predisposition and frailty on incident AF (P for interaction <0.0001), where those with frailty and the highest tertile of PRS had the highest risk of AF (HR 3.34, 95% CI: 3.08, 3.61, P < 0.0001) compared with those with non-frailty and the lowest tertile of PRS.
Physical pre-frailty and frailty were significantly and independently associated with incident arrhythmias. Although direct causal inference still needs to be further validated, these results suggested the importance of assessing and managing frailty for arrhythmia prevention.
横断面证据表明衰弱与心房颤动(AF)之间可能存在联系。目前尚不清楚衰弱与新发心律失常在纵向层面是否相关。本研究旨在确定衰弱表型与新发心律失常,尤其是AF,在纵向层面是否相关。
在这项英国生物银行的前瞻性队列研究中,排除了基线时患有心律失常、无衰弱表型数据以及无基因数据的个体。评估了身体衰弱的五个方面,包括体重减轻、疲惫、身体活动量低、握力低和步态速度慢。共使用142个单核苷酸多态性来计算AF的多基因风险评分(PRS)。利用医院住院记录和死亡记录来确定新发心律失常。
本研究纳入了464154名基线时无心律失常的中老年人(平均年龄56.4±8.1岁,54.7%为女性)。在中位随访13.4年(超过590万人年)期间,记录了46454例新发心律失常病例。与非衰弱者相比,衰弱前期和衰弱参与者发生AF的多变量调整风险比(HR)分别为1.12(95%CI:1.09,1.15,P<0.0001)和1.44(95%CI:1.36,1.51,P<0.0001)。其他心律失常也观察到类似的关联。我们发现步态速度慢是预测所有心律失常(包括AF)的最强危险因素(HR 1.34,95%CI:1.30,1.39)、缓慢性心律失常(HR 1.30,95%CI:1.22,1.37)、传导系统疾病(HR 1.29,95%CI:1.22,1.36)、室上性心律失常(HR 1.32,95%CI:1.19,1.47)和室性心律失常(HR 1.37,95%CI:1.25,1.51),所有P值均<0.0001。除步态速度慢外,体重减轻(HR 1.13,95%CI:1.09,1.16,P<0.0001)和疲惫(HR 1.11,95%CI:l.07,1.14,P<0.0001)与新发AF显著相关,而身体活动量(HR 1.03,95%CI:0.996,1.08,P=0.099)和握力低(HR 1.00,95%CI:0.97,1.03,P=0.89)的关联不显著。我们观察到遗传易感性与衰弱在新发AF方面存在显著交互作用(交互作用P<0.0001),与非衰弱且PRS处于最低三分位数者相比,衰弱且PRS处于最高三分位数者发生AF的风险最高(HR 3.34,95%CI:3.08,3.61,P<0.0001)。
身体衰弱前期和衰弱与新发心律失常显著且独立相关。尽管直接因果推断仍需进一步验证,但这些结果表明评估和管理衰弱对于预防心律失常具有重要意义。