Theken Katherine N, Ghosh Soumita, Skarke Carsten, Fries Susanne, Lahens Nicholas F, Sarantopoulou Dimitra, Grant Gregory R, FitzGerald Garret A, Grosser Tilo
Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Pharmacology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
medRxiv. 2024 May 31:2024.05.30.24308244. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.30.24308244.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events via suppression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-derived prostacyclin (PGI) formation in heart, vasculature, and kidney. The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety versus Ibuprofen Or Naproxen (PRECISION) trial and other large clinical studies compared the cardiovascular risk of traditional NSAIDs (i.e. naproxen), which inhibit both COX isozymes, with NSAIDs selective for COX-2 (i.e. celecoxib). However, whether pharmacologically equipotent doses were used - that is, whether a similar degree of COX-2 inhibition was achieved - was not considered. We compared drug target inhibition and blood pressure response to celecoxib at the dose used by most patients in PRECISION with the lowest recommended naproxen dose for osteoarthritis, which is lower than the dose used in PRECISION.
Sixteen healthy participants (19-61 years) were treated with celecoxib (100 mg every 12h), naproxen (250 mg every 12h), or placebo administered twice daily for seven days in a double-blind, crossover design randomized by order. On Day 7 when drug levels had reached steady state, the degree of COX inhibition was assessed and . Ambulatory blood pressure was measured throughout the final 12h dosing interval.
Both NSAIDs inhibited COX-2 activity relative to placebo, but naproxen inhibited COX-2 activity to a greater degree (62.9±21.7%) than celecoxib (35.7±25.2%; p<0.05). Similarly, naproxen treatment inhibited PGI formation (48.0±24.9%) to a greater degree than celecoxib (26.7±24.6%; p<0.05). Naproxen significantly increased blood pressure compared to celecoxib (differences in least-square means of mean arterial pressure: 2.5 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.5, 3.5); systolic blood pressure: 4.0 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.9, 5.1); diastolic blood pressure: 1.8 mm Hg (95% CI: 0.8, 2.8); p<0.05 for all). The difference in systolic blood pressure relative to placebo was associated with the degree of COX-2 inhibition (p<0.05).
Celecoxib 200 mg/day inhibited COX-2 activity to a lesser degree than naproxen 500 mg/day, resulting in a less pronounced blood pressure increase. While the PRECISION trial concluded the non-inferiority of celecoxib regarding cardiovascular risk, this is based on a comparison of doses that are not equipotent.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02502006 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02502006).
非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)通过抑制心脏、血管和肾脏中环氧合酶(COX)-2衍生的前列环素(PGI)生成,增加不良心血管事件的风险。昔布类与布洛芬或萘普生综合安全性的前瞻性随机评估(PRECISION)试验及其他大型临床研究,比较了抑制两种COX同工酶的传统NSAIDs(即萘普生)与COX-2选择性NSAIDs(即塞来昔布)的心血管风险。然而,未考虑是否使用了药理学等效剂量——即是否实现了相似程度的COX-2抑制。我们将PRECISION中大多数患者使用的塞来昔布剂量与骨关节炎推荐的最低萘普生剂量进行比较,后者低于PRECISION中使用的剂量,比较药物对靶点的抑制作用及血压反应。
16名健康参与者(19 - 61岁)采用双盲、交叉设计,按顺序随机分为三组,分别接受塞来昔布(每12小时100mg)、萘普生(每12小时250mg)或安慰剂治疗,每日两次,共7天。在第7天药物水平达到稳态时,评估COX抑制程度,并在最后12小时给药间隔内全程测量动态血压。
与安慰剂相比,两种NSAIDs均抑制COX-2活性,但萘普生抑制COX-2活性的程度(62.9±21.7%)高于塞来昔布(35.7±25.2%;p<0.05)。同样,萘普生治疗对PGI生成的抑制程度(48.0±24.9%)高于塞来昔布(26.7±24.6%;p<0.05)。与塞来昔布相比,萘普生显著升高血压(平均动脉压最小二乘均值差异:2.5mmHg(95%CI:1.5,3.5);收缩压:4.0mmHg(95%CI:2.9,5.1);舒张压:1.8mmHg(95%CI:0.8,2.8);所有p<0.05)。相对于安慰剂,收缩压差异与COX-2抑制程度相关(p<0.05)。
每天200mg塞来昔布抑制COX-2活性的程度低于每天500mg萘普生,导致血压升高不那么明显。虽然PRECISION试验得出塞来昔布在心血管风险方面非劣效的结论,但这是基于非等效剂量的比较。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02502006(https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02502006)。