Mirghani Hyder, Alamrani Bandar Ahmed, Alamrani Fadi Olyan, Alasmari Mohammed Abdullah S, Albalawi Mohammed Ahmed I, Alquthami Hatem Hamad M, Ali Alalawi Ali Ahmed, Alzamhari Omar Sabbah, Albalawi Abdulaziz Nasser, Aljabri Mohammad Omar, Albalawi Turki Suleman, Mohammed Albalawi Ahmed
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, SAU.
Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT), King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Tabuk, SAU.
Cureus. 2024 May 9;16(5):e59998. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59998. eCollection 2024 May.
Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via the vestibular approach (TOETVA) represents a minimally invasive alternative to traditional open thyroidectomy (OT). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively analyze and compare postoperative pain outcomes between conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) and TOETVA. We conducted a systematic search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Medline, Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO), and Google Scholar, to identify cohorts and randomized trials comparing postoperative pain outcomes between patients undergoing transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via the vestibular approach (TOETVA) and those undergoing conventional thyroidectomy. The search period spanned from the earliest available article up to January 15, 2022. Keywords such as "scarless thyroidectomy," "endoscopic transoral via vestibular thyroidectomy," "conventional thyroidectomy," "transcervical thyroidectomy," "postoperative pain," and "visual analog pain score" were utilized to retrieve relevant studies. A total of 1,291 patients from 11 studies were included in our analysis, with 10 studies originating from Asia and one from Europe. Among these studies, seven were prospective, while four were retrospective. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain. Various statistical tests were also performed for data analysis, including the Chi-square and random effects model. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of studies. There was no significant statistical difference observed between the endoscopic transoral vestibular route and the conventional cervical approach in terms of visual analog scale (VAS) score, with an odds ratio of -0.37 and a 95% confidence interval ranging from -0.9 to 0.17. The overall effect had a P-value of 0.18. However, substantial heterogeneity was noted, with an I2 value for heterogeneity of 98% and a P-value for heterogeneity of less than 0.001. The Chi-square value was calculated as 364.02, and the main difference was 9. In comparison, TOETVA exhibited lower pain levels on the first day post-operation compared to conventional thyroidectomy, with an odds ratio of -1.36 and a 95% confidence interval ranging from -2.65 to -0.06. Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via the vestibular approach demonstrated superior outcomes compared to conventional thyroidectomy in terms of postoperative pain management on the first day following surgery. However, when considering overall pain management throughout the recovery period, no significant difference was observed between the two approaches. More extensive studies evaluating pain levels on the day of surgery and controlling for analgesic interventions are warranted.
经口前庭入路内镜甲状腺切除术(TOETVA)是传统开放性甲状腺切除术(OT)的一种微创替代方法。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是全面分析和比较传统开放性甲状腺切除术(COT)和TOETVA术后的疼痛结果。我们在多个数据库中进行了系统检索,包括PubMed、Medline、EBSCO和谷歌学术,以确定比较经口前庭入路内镜甲状腺切除术(TOETVA)患者与传统甲状腺切除术患者术后疼痛结果的队列研究和随机试验。检索期从最早的可用文章到2022年1月15日。使用“无痕甲状腺切除术”、“经口前庭内镜甲状腺切除术”、“传统甲状腺切除术”、“经颈甲状腺切除术”、“术后疼痛”和“视觉模拟疼痛评分”等关键词检索相关研究。我们的分析纳入了11项研究中的1291例患者,其中10项研究来自亚洲,1项来自欧洲。在这些研究中,7项为前瞻性研究,4项为回顾性研究。主要结局指标是术后疼痛。还进行了各种统计检验以进行数据分析,包括卡方检验和随机效应模型。使用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表评估研究质量。在内镜经口前庭入路与传统颈部入路之间,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分无显著统计学差异,优势比为-0.37,95%置信区间为-0.9至0.17。总体效应的P值为0.18。然而,观察到存在显著异质性,异质性的I2值为98%,异质性的P值小于0.001。卡方值计算为364.02,主要差异为9。相比之下,与传统甲状腺切除术相比,TOETVA术后第一天的疼痛水平较低,优势比为-1.36,95%置信区间为-2.65至-0.06。在前庭入路经口内镜甲状腺切除术中,术后第一天的疼痛管理方面,与传统甲状腺切除术相比,其结果更佳。然而,在考虑整个恢复期的总体疼痛管理时,两种方法之间未观察到显著差异。需要更广泛的研究来评估手术当天的疼痛水平并控制镇痛干预措施。