Miller Gabe H, Marquez-Velarde Guadalupe, Lindstrom Erika-Danielle, Keith Verna M, Brown Lauren E
Mississippi State University, Department of Sociology, African American Studies Program, 456 Hardy Road, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, United States.
Utah State University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology Logan, Utah, United States.
SSM Popul Health. 2022 May 25;18:101134. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101134. eCollection 2022 Jun.
We investigate the association neighborhood cohesion, as source of social support, has with psychological distress among white, Black, and Latinx lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals, compared to heterosexual individuals in the United States.
We estimate zero-order multinomial logistic regression models to assess the likelihood of moderate and severe psychological distress among respondents.
In the models accounting for neighborhood cohesion and all other covariates, white, Black, and Latinx lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals are more likely to meet the criteria for moderate and severe psychological distress than non-LGB people.
Neighborhood cohesion has differing impact on psychological distress outcomes by racial/ethnic-sexual orientation groups, but in general provides a greater magnitude of protection against moderate psychological distress for non-LGB groups and a greater magnitude of protection against severe psychological distress for LGB groups.
我们调查了在美国，作为社会支持来源的邻里凝聚力与白人、黑人以及拉丁裔女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋（LGB）个体心理困扰之间的关联，并与异性恋个体进行了比较。
我们估计零阶多项逻辑回归模型，以评估受访者出现中度和重度心理困扰的可能性。
在考虑邻里凝聚力和所有其他协变量的模型中，白人、黑人以及拉丁裔女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋个体比非LGB人群更有可能符合中度和重度心理困扰的标准。
邻里凝聚力对不同种族/族裔-性取向群体的心理困扰结果有不同影响，但总体而言，它为非LGB群体预防中度心理困扰提供了更大程度的保护，为LGB群体预防重度心理困扰提供了更大程度的保护。
