Dahlén Amelia D, Schofield Aphra, Schiöth Helgi B, Brooks Samantha J
Functional Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Faculty of Health, School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jul 18;16:868366. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.868366. eCollection 2022.
Prior research suggests that conscious face processing occurs preferentially in right hemisphere occipito-parietal regions. However, less is known about brain regions associated with non-conscious processing of faces, and whether a right-hemispheric dominance persists in line with specific affective responses. We aim to review the neural responses systematically, quantitatively, and qualitatively underlying subliminal face processing. PubMed was searched for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) publications assessing subliminal emotional face stimuli up to March 2022. Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses and narrative reviews were conducted on all studies that met ALE requirements. Risk of bias was assessed using the AXIS tool. In a meta-analysis of all 22 eligible studies (merging clinical and non-clinical populations, whole brain and region of interest analyses), bilateral amygdala activation was reported in the left (x = -19.2, y = 1.5, z = -17.1) in 59% of studies, and in the right (x = 24.4, y = -1.7, z = -17.4) in 68% of studies. In a second meta-analysis of non-clinical participants only ( = 18), bilateral amygdala was again reported in the left (x = -18, y = 3.9, z = -18.4) and right (x = 22.8, y = -0.9, z = -17.4) in 56% of studies for both clusters. In a final meta-analysis of whole-brain studies only (n=14), bilateral amygdala was also reported in the left (x = -20.2, y = 2.9, z = -17.2) in 64% of studies, and right (x = 24.2, y = -0.7, z = -17.8) in 71% of studies. The findings suggest that non-consciously detected emotional faces may influence amygdala activation, especially right-lateralized (a higher percentage of convergence in studies), which are integral for pre-conscious affect and long-term memory processing.
先前的研究表明,有意识的面部处理优先发生在右半球枕顶叶区域。然而,对于与面部无意识处理相关的脑区,以及右半球优势是否与特定情感反应一致持续存在,我们了解得较少。我们旨在系统地、定量地和定性地回顾潜意识面部处理背后的神经反应。在PubMed上搜索截至2022年3月评估潜意识情绪面部刺激的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)出版物。对所有符合激活可能性估计(ALE)要求的研究进行了ALE元分析和叙述性综述。使用AXIS工具评估偏倚风险。在对所有22项符合条件的研究(合并临床和非临床人群、全脑和感兴趣区域分析)的元分析中,59%的研究报告左侧杏仁核激活(x = -19.2,y = 1.5,z = -17.1),68%的研究报告右侧杏仁核激活(x = 24.4,y = -1.7,z = -17.4)。在仅针对非临床参与者的第二项元分析中(n = 18),56%的研究在两个簇中均报告了左侧(x = -18,y = 3.9,z = -18.4)和右侧(x = 22.8,y = -0.9,z = -17.4)杏仁核激活。在仅针对全脑研究的最终元分析中(n = 14),64%的研究报告左侧杏仁核激活(x = -20.2,y = 2.9,z = -17.2),71%的研究报告右侧杏仁核激活(x = 24.2,y = -0.7,z = -17.8)。研究结果表明,无意识检测到的情绪面孔可能会影响杏仁核激活,尤其是右侧化(研究中更高的汇聚百分比),这对于前意识情感和长期记忆处理至关重要。