Huang Jiayu, Zhang Tianyou, Mo Jiahui, Ye Lei, Zhong Wenwen, Xu Dazheng, Song Zhenzhu, Liu Jihua, Liu Dongliang, Tao Yiran, Wang Dejuan, Qiu Jianguang
Department of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Urology, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 May 31;13(5):720-735. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-632. Epub 2024 May 24.
Radiologists currently accept the concept of "interfascial plane (IFP)" to understand retroperitoneal anatomy, replacing Meyers' classic tricompartmental theory. Despite much research on retroperitoneal anatomy, its anatomical structure, embryonic origin and developmental process still require further exploration to guide the optimization of surgical process. This study aims to explore the anatomical basis of IFP related to laparoscopic upper retroperitoneal surgery (LURS) and to compare the clinical outcomes of trans-interfascial plane procedures for LURS (TIFP-LURS) with conventional LURS (Con-LURS).
The study consisted of two parts: cadaveric and clinical study. The cadaveric study involved dissecting and observing the retroperitoneal fasciae and IFP in 32 cadavers using gross anatomical and histological methods. This retrospective clinical study compared the perioperative data and complications of 229 patients who underwent TIFP-LURS and 121 patients who underwent Con-LURS for upper retroperitoneal lesions at our center.
The cadaveric study revealed that the retroperitoneal space was composed of multilaminar fasciae that formed potential bloodless spaces among them, that could be used as surgical landmarks and operating planes. The clinical study showed that TIFP-LURS had a significantly less estimated blood loss, lower intraoperative complication rate, lower postoperative complication rate, shorter hospital-stay and lower long-term postoperative complications rate than Con-LURS. Multivariate analysis indicated that the TIFP procedure was an independent protective factor for decreasing the risk of postoperative complications.
The IFP are potential avascular spaces that can be used during laparoscopic surgery, and TIFP-LURS is a novel surgical approach that can improve the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for upper retroperitoneal lesions.
放射科医生目前接受“筋膜间平面(IFP)”的概念来理解腹膜后解剖结构,以取代迈耶斯的经典三室理论。尽管对腹膜后解剖结构进行了大量研究,但其解剖结构、胚胎起源和发育过程仍需进一步探索,以指导手术过程的优化。本研究旨在探讨与腹腔镜上腹膜后手术(LURS)相关的IFP的解剖学基础,并比较LURS经筋膜间平面手术(TIFP-LURS)与传统LURS(Con-LURS)的临床疗效。
本研究包括两部分:尸体研究和临床研究。尸体研究采用大体解剖和组织学方法,对32具尸体的腹膜后筋膜和IFP进行解剖和观察。这项回顾性临床研究比较了在本中心接受TIFP-LURS治疗的229例患者和接受Con-LURS治疗的121例上腹膜后病变患者的围手术期数据和并发症。
尸体研究显示,腹膜后间隙由多层筋膜组成,这些筋膜之间形成了潜在的无血间隙,可作为手术标志和操作平面。临床研究表明,与Con-LURS相比,TIFP-LURS的估计失血量显著减少,术中并发症发生率更低,术后并发症发生率更低,住院时间更短,术后长期并发症发生率更低。多因素分析表明,TIFP手术是降低术后并发症风险的独立保护因素。
IFP是腹腔镜手术中可利用的潜在无血管间隙,TIFP-LURS是一种新型手术方法,可提高腹腔镜上腹膜后病变手术的安全性和疗效。