• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体规模会影响西澳大利亚野生喜鹊(Gymnorhina tibicen dorsalis)的自发数量辨别能力。

Group size affects spontaneous quantity discrimination performance in wild Western Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen dorsalis).

作者信息

Hunter Holly, Blackburn Grace, Ashton Benjamin J, Ridley Amanda R

机构信息

Centre of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2025 May 26;28(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01963-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-025-01963-0
PMID:40418245
Abstract

Animals may benefit from the ability to discriminate between quantities in their environment; for example, when choosing between foraging patches differing in food availability or assessing the size of rival groups. Numerous studies utilising spontaneous quantity discrimination tasks have found that a wide range of species possess the ability to discriminate between quantities, with large interspecific differences being found in these capabilities. However, the causes of variation in quantity discrimination have received less attention, particularly when considering intraspecific variation. Here, we use a spontaneous quantity discrimination task to (i) investigate if Western Australian magpies possess quantity discrimination abilities, and (ii) determine the factors that underlie individual variation in this ability. We found that magpies were able to discriminate between two discrete quantities of a food reward and chose the larger quantity of food more often than expected by chance, with their accuracy increasing as the difference between the two quantities of food items increased (i.e. as the ratio decreased). Individual performance on the assay was significantly affected by group size, with individuals from smaller groups choosing the larger quantity of food more often than individuals from larger groups when presented with the 2 vs. 5 combination. This group size difference may arise because individuals from smaller groups benefit more from enhanced quantity discrimination abilities compared to individuals from larger groups due to the greater risk of competition and loss of resources from intergroup conflict with larger groups. Our study is the first to investigate and identify group size as a source of intraspecific variation in spontaneous quantity discrimination abilities and highlights the importance of considering the causes of individual variation in cognitive performance.

摘要

动物可能会从辨别环境中数量的能力中受益;例如,在不同食物可获得性的觅食区域之间进行选择,或评估竞争群体的规模时。许多利用自发数量辨别任务的研究发现,广泛的物种都具备辨别数量的能力,并且在这些能力上发现了很大的种间差异。然而,数量辨别差异的原因受到的关注较少,尤其是在考虑种内差异时。在这里,我们使用自发数量辨别任务来:(i)调查西澳大利亚喜鹊是否具备数量辨别能力,以及(ii)确定这种能力个体差异的潜在因素。我们发现喜鹊能够辨别两种不同数量的食物奖励,并且比随机预期更频繁地选择数量更多的食物,随着两种食物数量之间的差异增加(即比例降低),它们的准确率也会提高。在该试验中,个体表现受到群体规模的显著影响,当呈现2对5的组合时,来自较小群体的个体比来自较大群体的个体更频繁地选择数量更多的食物。这种群体规模差异可能是因为与来自较大群体的个体相比,来自较小群体的个体从增强的数量辨别能力中受益更多,这是由于与较大群体的群体间冲突导致竞争加剧和资源损失的风险更大。我们的研究首次调查并确定群体规模是自发数量辨别能力种内差异的一个来源,并强调了考虑认知表现个体差异原因的重要性。

相似文献

1
Group size affects spontaneous quantity discrimination performance in wild Western Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen dorsalis).群体规模会影响西澳大利亚野生喜鹊(Gymnorhina tibicen dorsalis)的自发数量辨别能力。
Anim Cogn. 2025 May 26;28(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01963-0.
2
Aggressive interactions influence cognitive performance in Western Australian magpies.攻击性互动会影响西澳大利亚喜鹊的认知表现。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Jun;291(2024):20240435. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0435. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
3
Cognition mediates response to anthropogenic noise in wild Western Australian magpies (Gmynorhina tibicen dorsalis).认知介导了西澳大利亚野生喜鹊(黄嘴喜鹊指名亚种)对人为噪音的反应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Dec;29(24):6912-6930. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16975. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
4
Call combination production is linked to the social environment in Western Australian magpies ().鸦科组合发声与西澳鸦的社会环境有关。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jul 8;379(1905):20230198. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0198. Epub 2024 May 20.
5
Counting on your friends: The role of social environment on quantity discrimination.依靠你的朋友:社会环境在数量辨别中的作用。
Behav Processes. 2016 Jul;128:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.019. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
6
Heritability of cognitive performance in wild Western Australian magpies.西澳大利亚野生喜鹊认知能力的遗传力。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Mar 13;11(3):231399. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231399. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Cognitive performance is linked to group size and affects fitness in Australian magpies.认知表现与群体大小有关,并影响澳大利亚喜鹊的适应度。
Nature. 2018 Feb 15;554(7692):364-367. doi: 10.1038/nature25503. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
8
Quantity discrimination in 9 ungulate species: Individuals take item number and size into account to discriminate quantities.9 种有蹄类动物的数量辨别:个体考虑项目数量和大小来辨别数量。
Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:105979. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105979. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
9
Investigating the relationship between physical cognitive tasks and a social cognitive task in a wild bird.研究野生鸟类的身体认知任务与社会认知任务之间的关系。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Jul 26;27(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01892-4.
10
Quantity discrimination in a spontaneous task in a poison frog.箭毒蛙自发任务中的数量辨别
Anim Cogn. 2022 Feb;25(1):27-32. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01528-x. Epub 2021 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioecological drivers of injuries and aggression in female and male rhesus macaques ().雌性和雄性恒河猴受伤与攻击行为的社会生态驱动因素()。 (括号内容原文缺失,无法准确完整翻译)
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2025;79(3):47. doi: 10.1007/s00265-025-03587-3. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Investigating the relationship between physical cognitive tasks and a social cognitive task in a wild bird.研究野生鸟类的身体认知任务与社会认知任务之间的关系。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Jul 26;27(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01892-4.
3
Wild cognition - linking form and function of cognitive abilities within a natural context.
野生认知——在自然环境中关联认知能力的形式与功能。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2022 Apr;44:101115. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101115. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
4
Meta-analyses reveal support for the Social Intelligence Hypothesis.元分析结果支持社会智力假说。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024 Oct;99(5):1889-1908. doi: 10.1111/brv.13103. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
5
Social complexity affects cognitive abilities but not brain structure in a Poeciliid fish.社会复杂性影响一种花鳉科鱼类的认知能力,但不影响其大脑结构。
Behav Ecol. 2024 Apr 2;35(3):arae026. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arae026. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
6
Heritability of cognitive performance in wild Western Australian magpies.西澳大利亚野生喜鹊认知能力的遗传力。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Mar 13;11(3):231399. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231399. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
High temperatures are associated with reduced cognitive performance in wild southern pied babblers.高温会导致南方白腰文鸟的认知能力下降。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Nov 29;290(2011):20231077. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1077. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
8
Slowly walking down to the more food: relative quantity discrimination in African spurred tortoises (Centrochelys sulcata).缓慢地走向更多的食物:非洲刺龟(Centrochelys sulcata)的相对数量辨别。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Sep;26(5):1675-1683. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01812-y. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
9
Numerical cognition in black-handed spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi).黑掌蜘蛛猴(Ateles geoffroyi)的数字认知。
Behav Processes. 2022 Sep;201:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104734. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
10
Kidnapping intergroup young: an alternative strategy to maintain group size in the group-living pied babbler ().绑架异群幼鸟:维持群体生活的白腰文鸟()群体大小的一种替代策略。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210153. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0153. Epub 2022 Apr 4.