文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

一项随机对照试验,旨在通过共享决策治疗计划流程来增强 MBC 患者的共享决策。

A randomized controlled trial of shared decision-making treatment planning process to enhance shared decision-making in patients with MBC.

机构信息

O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Aug;206(3):483-493. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07304-y. Epub 2024 Jun 10.


DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07304-y
PMID:38856885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11208240/
Abstract

PURPOSE: Opportunities exist for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to engage in shared decision-making (SDM). Presenting patient-reported data, including patient treatment preferences, to oncologists before or during a treatment plan decision may improve patient engagement in treatment decisions. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial evaluated the standard-of-care treatment planning process vs. a novel treatment planning process focused on SDM, which included oncologist review of patient-reported treatment preferences, prior to or during treatment decisions among women with MBC. The primary outcome was patient perception of shared decision-making. Secondary outcomes included patient activation, treatment satisfaction, physician perception of treatment decision-making, and use of treatment plans. RESULTS: Among the 109 evaluable patients from December 2018 to June 2022, 28% were Black and 12% lived in a highly disadvantaged neighborhood. Although not reaching statistical significance, patients in the intervention arm perceived SDM more often than patients in the control arm (63% vs. 59%; Cramer's V = 0.05; OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.55-2.57). Among patients in the intervention arm, 31% were at the highest level of patient activation compared to 19% of those in the control arm (V = 0.18). In 82% of decisions, the oncologist agreed that the patient-reported data helped them engage in SDM. In 45% of decision, they reported changing management due to patient-reported data. CONCLUSIONS: Oncologist engagement in the treatment planning process, with oncologist review of patient-reported data, is a promising approach to improve patient participation in treatment decisions which should be tested in larger studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03806738.

摘要

目的:转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者有机会参与共同决策(SDM)。在治疗计划决策之前或期间向肿瘤医生呈现患者报告的结果数据,包括患者的治疗偏好,可能会提高患者对治疗决策的参与度。

方法:这项随机对照试验评估了标准护理治疗计划流程与侧重于 SDM 的新型治疗计划流程,新型治疗计划流程包括在治疗决策前或期间,由肿瘤医生审查患者报告的治疗偏好。主要结局是患者对共同决策的感知。次要结局包括患者激活度、治疗满意度、医生对治疗决策的感知以及治疗计划的使用。

结果:在 2018 年 12 月至 2022 年 6 月期间的 109 例可评估患者中,28%为黑人,12%居住在高度贫困社区。虽然未达到统计学意义,但干预组患者比对照组患者更频繁地感知到 SDM(63%比 59%;Cramer's V=0.05;OR 1.19;95%CI 0.55-2.57)。在干预组中,31%的患者处于患者激活度的最高水平,而对照组中这一比例为 19%(V=0.18)。在 82%的决策中,肿瘤医生同意患者报告的数据有助于他们参与 SDM。在 45%的决策中,他们报告因患者报告的数据而改变了管理。

结论:肿瘤医生参与治疗计划流程,审查患者报告的数据,是提高患者参与治疗决策的一种有前途的方法,应该在更大规模的研究中进行测试。

试验注册:NCT03806738。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/0b37a0a1d4ee/10549_2024_7304_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/15c696ed29ed/10549_2024_7304_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/0bacf68bc293/10549_2024_7304_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/51edb4d3eba0/10549_2024_7304_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/e92448b76559/10549_2024_7304_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/1b09d7a04aa6/10549_2024_7304_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/0b37a0a1d4ee/10549_2024_7304_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/15c696ed29ed/10549_2024_7304_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/0bacf68bc293/10549_2024_7304_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/51edb4d3eba0/10549_2024_7304_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/e92448b76559/10549_2024_7304_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/1b09d7a04aa6/10549_2024_7304_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1adc/11208240/0b37a0a1d4ee/10549_2024_7304_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
A randomized controlled trial of shared decision-making treatment planning process to enhance shared decision-making in patients with MBC.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024-8

[2]
Treatment Decision Making and Financial Toxicity in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Clin Breast Cancer. 2021-2

[3]
Is There a Relationship between Shared Decision Making and Breast Cancer Patients' Trust in Their Medical Oncologists?

Med Decis Making. 2019-12-2

[4]
How Does a Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Intervention for Oncologists Affect Participation Style and Preference Matching in Patients with Breast and Colon Cancer?

J Cancer Educ. 2018-6

[5]
Importance of quality-of-life priorities and preferences surrounding treatment decision making in patients with cancer and oncology clinicians.

Cancer. 2020-8-1

[6]
Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Oncologist. 2020-3

[7]
Assessment of Shared Decision-making for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Intern Med. 2020-9-1

[8]
Shared decision making with breast cancer patients - does it work? Results of the cluster-randomized, multicenter DBCG RT SDM trial.

Radiother Oncol. 2024-4

[9]
Trust but Verify: Exploring the Role of Treatment-Related Information and Patient-Physician Trust in Shared Decision Making Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

J Cancer Educ. 2020-10

[10]
Using Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Approach to Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Osteoarthritis Management: A Patient Perception Study.

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025-2

引用本文的文献

[1]
Impact of radiation therapy on breast satisfaction and health-related quality of life after breast reconstruction: a multicenter cross-sectional controlled study (Reborn study-02).

Breast Cancer. 2025-8-22

[2]
Integrating social work and shared decision-making for equity in metastatic breast cancer care.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024-10

本文引用的文献

[1]
The decision aid is the easy part: workflow challenges of shared decision making in cancer care.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023-11-8

[2]
Practice Considerations for Participation in the Enhancing Oncology Model.

JCO Oncol Pract. 2022-11

[3]
Patient activation reduces effects of implicit bias on doctor-patient interactions.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022-8-9

[4]
Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022-6

[5]
Patient reported outcomes in oncology: changing perspectives-a systematic review.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022-5-21

[6]
Building Sustainable Practice Transformation Through Payment Reform Initiatives.

JCO Oncol Pract. 2022-5

[7]
Geriatric Assessment-Driven Intervention (GAIN) on Chemotherapy-Related Toxic Effects in Older Adults With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Oncol. 2021-11-1

[8]
Quality of life of therapies for hormone receptor positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer: Regulatory aspects and clinical impact in Europe.

Breast. 2021-10

[9]
Quantifying treatment preferences and their association with financial toxicity in women with breast cancer.

Cancer. 2021-2-1

[10]
Treatment Decision Making and Financial Toxicity in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Clin Breast Cancer. 2021-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索