• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坦桑尼亚农村分散系统下老年人医疗保健优先排序过程:前景与挑战。

Health care prioritization process for the elderly in rural Tanzania under decentralized system: Prospects and challenges.

机构信息

Department of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0304243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304243. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0304243
PMID:38857259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11164382/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Beginning the early 1990s, many countries globally adopted the third-generation health sector reforms with a focus of strengthening the primary health care system through community participation. On the contrary, three decades later, primary health care systems in many Low- and Middle-Income countries (LMICs) including Tanzania have remained weak. Specifically, priority setting for the vulnerable groups including the elderly have been weak. We aimed to analyse the prospects and challenges of the priority setting process for the elderly health care services following the 1990s health sector reforms in Tanzania.

METHODS

We conducted an exploratory case study on priority setting process for the elderly healthcare services in Igunga and Nzega Tanzania. We carried out 24 Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with the positions of District medical officers, social welfare, Medical Officers in-charge (MOI), planning officers and health system information focal person. Additionally, we carried out two focus group discussions (FGDs), one from each district with six participants from each group. Participants for the FGDs were MOI, health secretary, representative members of Health Facility Governing Committee (HFGC) and Council Health Management Team (CHMT). Data were analyzed using the qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Two categories emerged from the analysis of the transcripts. These were the prospects and challenges in priority setting for the elderly population under the decentralized health sector in rural Tanzania. The prospects included; the capacity of the LGAs on priority setting; existence of strategies used by LGAs; availability of teamwork spirit and the existence of guidelines for priority setting at LGAs. The challenges included difficulties of elderly identification, insufficient resources to implement the planned activities at the LGAs, unintegrated digitalized government health information tools or programs at the LGAs, interference of LGAs by the Central Government and low interest of stakeholders on elderly health care.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the prospects and challenges facing priority setting for elderly care at the centralized health system in rural Tanzania. From the results the process is well organized but faces some challenges which if not addressed jeopardized and has potential to continue affecting the priority setting. Addressing the challenges highlighted requires joint efforts from both the elderly population in the community, healthcare providers and decision makers across all levels of the health system. This study serves as an eye-opener and calls for a bigger study to get a comprehensive picture of priority setting of the elderly health care in Tanzania.

摘要

引言

从 20 世纪 90 年代初开始,许多国家开始实施第三代卫生部门改革,重点是通过社区参与来加强初级卫生保健系统。然而,三十年后,包括坦桑尼亚在内的许多低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的初级卫生保健系统仍然薄弱。具体来说,弱势群体(包括老年人)的优先事项制定一直很薄弱。我们旨在分析 20 世纪 90 年代坦桑尼亚卫生部门改革后,老年人医疗服务优先事项制定过程的前景和挑战。

方法

我们对坦桑尼亚伊古恩加和恩扎地区老年人医疗服务的优先事项制定过程进行了探索性案例研究。我们对 24 名关键知情人(KII)进行了访谈,这些人担任地区医疗官员、社会福利、医疗主任(MOI)、规划官员和卫生系统信息协调人。此外,我们还在每个地区进行了两次焦点小组讨论(FGD),每组有 6 名参与者。FGD 的参与者是 MOI、卫生局长、卫生设施管理委员会(HFGC)和理事会卫生管理团队(CHMT)的代表成员。数据采用定性内容分析进行分析。

结果

从对农村坦桑尼亚分散卫生部门老年人人口优先事项制定的分析中得出了两个类别。这些是在农村坦桑尼亚分散的卫生部门下,为老年人确定优先事项的前景和挑战。前景包括:地方政府机构在确定优先事项方面的能力;地方政府机构使用的战略的存在;团队合作精神的存在和地方政府机构优先事项制定的指导方针的存在。挑战包括难以确定老年人的身份、地方政府机构实施计划活动的资源不足、地方政府机构缺乏整合的数字化政府卫生信息工具或方案、中央政府对地方政府机构的干预以及利益相关者对老年人保健的兴趣较低。

结论

本研究强调了在农村坦桑尼亚集中卫生系统中为老年人保健确定优先事项所面临的前景和挑战。从结果来看,该过程组织良好,但面临一些挑战,如果不加以解决,将危及并有可能继续影响优先事项的确定。解决突出的挑战需要社区老年人、医疗保健提供者和各级卫生系统决策者共同努力。这项研究引起了人们的关注,并呼吁进行更大的研究,以全面了解坦桑尼亚老年人保健的优先事项制定情况。

相似文献

1
Health care prioritization process for the elderly in rural Tanzania under decentralized system: Prospects and challenges.坦桑尼亚农村分散系统下老年人医疗保健优先排序过程:前景与挑战。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0304243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304243. eCollection 2024.
2
Stakeholders' participation in planning and priority setting in the context of a decentralised health care system: the case of prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV programme in Tanzania.利益相关者在分权式医疗体系下参与规划和重点事项设定:以坦桑尼亚母婴 HIV 传播预防项目为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 12;13:273. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-273.
3
Promoting community participation in priority setting in district health systems: experiences from Mbarali district, Tanzania.促进社区参与地区卫生系统的优先事项制定:来自坦桑尼亚姆巴拉利地区的经验。
Glob Health Action. 2013 Nov 25;6:22669. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.22669.
4
The dependency on central government funding of decentralised health systems: experiences of the challenges and coping strategies in the Kongwa District, Tanzania.分散式卫生系统对中央政府资金的依赖:坦桑尼亚孔瓜区面临的挑战及应对策略经验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 25;14:39. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-39.
5
Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework.坦桑尼亚分散式医疗保健重点制定:基于合理性问责框架的评估。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(4):751-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.035. Epub 2010 May 25.
6
Achievements and challenges of resource allocation for health in a decentralized system in Tanzania: perspectives of national and district level officers.坦桑尼亚分权系统中卫生资源分配的成就与挑战:国家和地区层面官员的观点
East Afr J Public Health. 2013 Jun;10(2):416-27.
7
Improving district level health planning and priority setting in Tanzania through implementing accountability for reasonableness framework: Perceptions of stakeholders.通过实施合理性问责框架来改善坦桑尼亚地区卫生规划和重点设定:利益相关者的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec 1;10:322. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-322.
8
Involving decision-makers in the research process: Challenges of implementing the accountability for reasonableness approach to priority setting at the district level in Tanzania.让决策者参与研究过程:在坦桑尼亚地区层面实施合理性问责制以确定优先事项所面临的挑战。
Glob Public Health. 2014;9(7):760-72. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.922208. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
9
Healthcare workers´ experiences and perceptions of the provision of health insurance benefits to the elderly in rural Tanzania: an explorative qualitative study.坦桑尼亚农村地区医疗保健工作者提供老年人健康保险福利的经验和看法:一项探索性定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15297-4.
10
From papers to practices: district level priority setting processes and criteria for family planning, maternal, newborn and child health interventions in Tanzania.从论文到实践:坦桑尼亚地区计划生育、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施的优先事项设定过程和标准。
BMC Womens Health. 2011 Oct 21;11:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic and geographical disparities in disability distribution among Tanzanian population: insights from the 2022 demographic and health survey and malaria indicator survey.坦桑尼亚人口中残疾分布的社会经济和地理差异:来自2022年人口与健康调查及疟疾指标调查的见解
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):2455. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23152-x.
2
Advancements and Innovation Trends of Information Technology Empowering Elderly Care Community Services Based on CiteSpace and VOSViewer.基于CiteSpace和VOSViewer的信息技术赋能老年护理社区服务的进展与创新趋势
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;13(13):1628. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131628.
3
Community health systems and priority setting for elderly healthcare services in rural Tanzania: Experience from Nzega and Igunga districts.坦桑尼亚农村地区的社区卫生系统与老年医疗服务的优先事项设定:来自恩泽加和伊贡加地区的经验
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 15;20(4):e0321482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321482. eCollection 2025.
4
Controversies in implementing the exemption policy for the elderly healthcare services in Tanzania: experiences from the priority setting process in two selected districts.坦桑尼亚老年人医疗服务豁免政策实施中的争议:来自两个选定地区优先事项设定过程的经验
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Dec 3;22(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00595-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Does health insurance contribute to improved utilization of health care services for the elderly in rural Tanzania? A cross-sectional study.健康保险是否有助于改善坦桑尼亚农村老年人对医疗保健服务的利用?一项横断面研究。
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1841962. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1841962.
2
Responsiveness of health care services towards the elderly in Tanzania: does health insurance make a difference? A cross-sectional study.坦桑尼亚医疗卫生服务对老年人的响应性:医疗保险有影响吗?一项横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Oct 12;19(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01270-9.
3
Can survey data facilitate local priority setting? Experience from the Igunga and Nzega districts in Tanzania.调查数据能否促进地方重点事项的设定?来自坦桑尼亚伊古恩加和恩扎加地区的经验。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Nov;29(11):3075-3086. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02547-w. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
4
Decentralisation and Health Services Delivery in 4 Districts in Tanzania: How and Why Does the Use of Decision Space Vary Across Districts?坦桑尼亚 4 个地区的权力下放与卫生服务提供:决策空间的使用如何以及为何在各地区存在差异?
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Feb 1;8(2):90-100. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.97.
5
Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol.了解坦桑尼亚直接卫生机构融资的实施情况及其对卫生系统绩效的影响:一项非对照前后混合方法研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 30;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0400-3.
6
Retention of medical doctors at the district level: a qualitative study of experiences from Tanzania.地区层面医生的留用情况:对坦桑尼亚经验的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3059-0.
7
Community Involvement in Health Systems Strengthening to Improve Global Health Outcomes: A Review of Guidelines and Potential Roles.社区参与卫生系统强化以改善全球健康成果:指南及潜在作用综述
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2017 Jul;37(3-4):139-149. doi: 10.1177/0272684X17738089. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
8
Training and deployment of medical doctors in Tanzania post-1990s health sector reforms: assessing the achievements.20世纪90年代后坦桑尼亚卫生部门改革中医生的培训与部署:评估成效
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Apr 4;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12960-017-0202-7.
9
Promoting community participation in priority setting in district health systems: experiences from Mbarali district, Tanzania.促进社区参与地区卫生系统的优先事项制定:来自坦桑尼亚姆巴拉利地区的经验。
Glob Health Action. 2013 Nov 25;6:22669. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.22669.
10
Why are pro-poor exemption policies in Tanzania better implemented in some districts than in others?为什么坦桑尼亚的有利于穷人的豁免政策在一些地区比在其他地区实施得更好?
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Sep 26;12:80. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-80.