• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生态驾驶对商用车驾驶员碰撞风险的影响。

Effect of eco-driving on commercial motor vehicle driver collision risk.

机构信息

Traffic Injury Research Foundation, 171 Nepean St., Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0B4, Canada.

Traffic Injury Research Foundation, 171 Nepean St., Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0B4, Canada.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2024 Jun;89:190-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.02.013. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.02.013
PMID:38858043
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates the effect among commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers of the adoption of fuel-efficient driving techniques (commonly known as eco-driving) on the odds of being involved in safety-related events.

METHOD

For 2,637 long-haul class 8 drivers employed by four carriers in Canada, information on driving style, total distance driven, and safety-related events like collisions, hard-braking, hard-turning, and stability control events were collected for each trip. Three carriers provided driving style-related data from the ISAAC instrument, which provides a score on a 0 to 100 scale that measures the degree to which a driver is using an appropriate amount of engine power according to driving conditions. The fourth carrier provided data on driving style characteristics, including fuel consumption, use of cruise control, and use of top gear. Depending on the carrier, information on speeding, driver age, and years of experience driving a commercial vehicle was also collected. Logit statistical models were developed to estimate the change in odds of a driver experiencing a safety-related event dependent on the measures of driving style.

RESULTS

A one-unit increase in the ISAAC score was associated with a 7%, 8%, 8%, and 4% reduction in the odds of having a hard-braking event, hard left-turn event, hard right-turn event, and collision, respectively. For the carrier not employing the ISAAC system, an increase of 10% in the time spent driving in top gear with steady speed near 100 km per hour (km/h) was associated with a substantial 34% decrease in stability control events. In addition, a year increase in the driver's age, as well as a 1% increase in the amount of time spent driving using cruise control, reduced the number of hard-braking events by 9% and 3%, respectively. Conclusion/Practical Applications: The adoption of fuel-efficient driving techniques enhances the safety of CMV drivers.

摘要

简介

本研究调查了商用机动车(CMV)驾驶员采用节油驾驶技术(通常称为生态驾驶)对与安全相关事件发生几率的影响。

方法

对于在加拿大的四家运输公司受雇的 2637 名长途 8 级卡车司机,为每次行程收集了驾驶风格、总行驶距离以及与安全相关的事件(如碰撞、急刹车、急转弯和稳定性控制事件)的信息。三家运输公司提供了来自 ISAAC 仪器的驾驶风格相关数据,该仪器提供了一个 0 到 100 分的分数,根据驾驶条件衡量驾驶员使用适当发动机功率的程度。第四家运输公司提供了有关驾驶风格特征的数据,包括燃料消耗、使用巡航控制和使用最高档。根据运输公司的不同,还收集了有关超速、驾驶员年龄和驾驶商用车辆年限的信息。开发了逻辑统计模型,以根据驾驶风格的衡量标准估算驾驶员经历安全相关事件的几率变化。

结果

ISAAC 分数每增加一个单位,急刹车事件、急左转弯事件、急右转弯事件和碰撞的几率分别降低 7%、8%、8%和 4%。对于不采用 ISAAC 系统的运输公司,以 100 公里/小时(km/h)的稳定速度在最高档行驶的时间增加 10%,与稳定性控制事件的大幅减少 34%相关。此外,驾驶员年龄增加一年,以及使用巡航控制的时间增加 1%,分别使急刹车事件的数量减少 9%和 3%。结论/实际应用:采用节油驾驶技术提高了商用机动车驾驶员的安全性。

相似文献

1
Effect of eco-driving on commercial motor vehicle driver collision risk.生态驾驶对商用车驾驶员碰撞风险的影响。
J Safety Res. 2024 Jun;89:190-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.02.013. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
2
Predicting performance and safety based on driver fatigue.基于驾驶员疲劳预测性能和安全。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 May;126:142-145. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
3
Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.来自100辆汽车自然驾驶研究的制动时碰撞时间的年龄和性别差异。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S15-20. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.928703.
4
Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.利用驾驶模拟器分析驾驶员回避时间对追尾碰撞风险的影响。
J Safety Res. 2021 Sep;78:242-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
5
Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.2011 年款道奇和吉普车主在使用防撞和相关技术方面的体验。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:298-303. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.936408.
6
Effects of an integrated collision warning system on risk compensation behavior: An examination under naturalistic driving conditions.综合碰撞预警系统对风险补偿行为的影响:自然驾驶条件下的检验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Dec;163:106450. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106450. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
7
Serious motor vehicle collisions involving young drivers on Norwegian roads 2013-2016: Speeding and driver-related errors are the main challenge.2013-2016 年挪威道路上涉及年轻驾驶员的严重机动车碰撞:超速和驾驶员相关错误是主要挑战。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(6):382-388. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1770237. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
8
Determinants of the occupational environment and heavy vehicle crashes in Western Australia: A case-control study.澳大利亚西部职业环境与重型车辆事故的决定因素:一项病例对照研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt B):452-458. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
9
Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.一辆配备自动控制系统的汽车与一辆半挂牵引车发生致命碰撞。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S153-S156. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1532211.
10
A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.基于手机使用和性别影响下驾驶员避撞过程的追尾碰撞风险评估模型——一项基于驾驶模拟器的研究
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Dec;97:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.021. Epub 2016 Aug 23.