• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用结构方程模型评估碰撞倾向的决定因素:同车驾驶员引起的分神的作用。

Assessing the determinants of crash propensity using structural equation modeling: Role of distractions caused by fellow drivers.

机构信息

Suleman Dawood School of Business, Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), Lahore 54792, Pakistan.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia; Interdisciplinary Center of Smart Mobility and Logistics, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, P.O. Box 5067, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2024 Jun;89:210-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.02.012. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.02.012
PMID:38858045
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Aggressive behavior of drivers is a source of crashes and high injury severity. Aggressive drivers are part of the driving environment, however, excessive aggressive driving by fellow drivers may take the attention of the recipient drivers away from the road resulting in distracted driving. Such external distractions caused by the aggressive and discourteous behavior of other road users have received limited attention. These distractions caused by fellow drivers (DFDs) may agitate recipient drivers and ultimately increase crash propensity. Aggressive driving behaviors are quite common in South Asia and, thus, it is necessary to determine their contribution to distractions and crash propensity.

METHOD

Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of DFDs using primary data collected through a survey conducted in Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 801 complete responses were obtained. Various hypotheses were defined to explore the associations between the latent factors such as DFDs, anxiety/stress (AS), anxiety-based performance deficits (APD), hostile behavior (HB), acceptability of vehicle-related distractions (AVRD), and crash propensity (CP). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed as a multivariate statistical technique to test these hypotheses.

RESULTS

The results supported the hypothesis that DFDs lead to AS among recipient drivers. DFDs and AS were further found to have positive associations with APDs. Whereas, there was a significant negative association between DFD, AS, and AVRD. As hypothesized, DFD and AS had positive associations with CP, indicating that distractions caused by aggressive behaviors leads to stress and consequently enhances crash propensity.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

The results of this study provide a statistically sound foundation for further exploration of the distractions caused by the aggressive behaviors of fellow drivers. Further, the results of this study can be utilized by the relevant authorities to alter aggressive driving behaviors and reduce DFDs.

摘要

简介

驾驶员的攻击性行为是碰撞和高伤害严重程度的一个来源。攻击性驾驶员是驾驶环境的一部分,然而,其他驾驶员过度的攻击性驾驶可能会使接收驾驶员的注意力从道路上转移,导致驾驶分心。其他道路使用者的不礼貌和攻击性行为造成的这种外部干扰受到的关注有限。这些由其他驾驶员(DFD)引起的干扰可能会激怒接收驾驶员,并最终增加事故倾向。攻击性驾驶行为在南亚很常见,因此,有必要确定它们对干扰和事故倾向的影响。

方法

我们的研究旨在通过在巴基斯坦拉合尔进行的一项调查收集的原始数据来评估 DFD 的影响。共获得了 801 份完整的回复。定义了各种假设来探索 DFD、焦虑/压力 (AS)、基于焦虑的表现缺陷 (APD)、敌对行为 (HB)、可接受的与车辆相关的干扰 (AVRD) 和事故倾向 (CP) 等潜在因素之间的关联。结构方程模型 (SEM) 被用作测试这些假设的多变量统计技术。

结果

结果支持了这样一种假设,即 DFD 会导致接收驾驶员产生 AS。DFD 和 AS 进一步被发现与 APD 呈正相关。然而,DFD、AS 和 AVRD 之间存在显著的负相关。正如假设的那样,DFD 和 AS 与 CP 呈正相关,表明由攻击性行为引起的干扰会导致压力,从而增加事故倾向。

实际应用

本研究的结果为进一步探索同行驾驶员攻击性行为引起的干扰提供了统计上合理的基础。此外,这项研究的结果可以被相关当局利用来改变攻击性驾驶行为并减少 DFD。

相似文献

1
Assessing the determinants of crash propensity using structural equation modeling: Role of distractions caused by fellow drivers.使用结构方程模型评估碰撞倾向的决定因素:同车驾驶员引起的分神的作用。
J Safety Res. 2024 Jun;89:210-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.02.012. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
Investigating in-vehicle distracting activities and crash risks for young drivers using structural equation modeling.采用结构方程模型研究年轻驾驶员车内分心活动与碰撞风险。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235325. eCollection 2020.
3
Adaptation of the driver behaviour questionnaire and behavioural risk factors for traffic violation arrest and self-reported crash involvement among Nigerian drivers.尼日利亚驾驶员的驾驶行为问卷适应性以及交通违规被捕和自我报告的撞车事故参与情况的行为风险因素
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020 Apr-Jun;27(2):93-100. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_172_19.
4
What drives technology-based distractions? A structural equation model on social-psychological factors of technology-based driver distraction engagement.是什么导致了基于技术的注意力分散?一个关于基于技术的驾驶员注意力分散参与度社会心理因素的结构方程模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jun;91:166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.015. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
5
Trait Predictors of Aggression and Crash-Related Behaviors Across Drivers from the United Kingdom and the Irish Republic.英国和爱尔兰共和国驾驶员攻击性行为及与撞车相关行为的特质预测因素
Risk Anal. 2015 Sep;35(9):1730-45. doi: 10.1111/risa.12379. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
6
Examining the influence of aggressive driving behavior on driver injury severity in traffic crashes.分析驾驶行为激进程度对交通事故中驾驶员受伤严重程度的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1839-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
7
Distractions and the risk of car crash injury: the effect of drivers' age.注意力分散与车祸受伤风险:驾驶员年龄的影响
J Safety Res. 2002 Fall;33(3):411-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4375(02)00034-8.
8
The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers.分心对青少年驾驶员撞车类型的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Sep 22.
9
The increased risk of road crashes in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) adult drivers: driven by distraction? Results from a responsibility case-control study.注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)成年驾驶员道路交通事故风险增加:是由注意力分散导致的吗?一项责任病例对照研究的结果
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 23;9(12):e115002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115002. eCollection 2014.
10
Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.乐观的看法:在“百车”数据中,行车时的扫视指标能区分撞车事故和险些撞车事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Oct;107:48-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating lightweight YOLOv5s and facial 3D keypoints for enhanced fatigued-driving detection.集成轻量级YOLOv5s和面部3D关键点以增强疲劳驾驶检测
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024 Dec 5;10:e2447. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2447. eCollection 2024.