Florida State University, Criminology and Criminal Justice Building, 112 S. Copeland Street, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-1273, USA.
J Public Health Policy. 2024 Sep;45(3):543-551. doi: 10.1057/s41271-024-00494-1. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
Gun violence, often characterized as a singular issue, is not one cohesive problem. Instead, it takes many forms resulting from the complex interplay of multiple factors. Outcomes of gun violence also vary significantly. They may be (a) physically non-injurious (a gun is brandished), (b) injurious but non-lethal, or (c) lethal. To understand and address gun violence effectively, it is essential to consider various risk factors for both non-lethal and lethal gun violence victimization, using a comprehensive, comparative framework. We present a novel comparative framework for better understanding gun violence, and for developing policy responses to this violence. We disaggregate gun violence into its various forms and propose a conceptualization of risk factors in discrete categories, each with important implications for policy intervention. While we emphasize the value of this framework for understanding and combatting interpersonal gun violence in America, the research and policy approaches discussed here should be equally applicable to other international contexts with gun violence as a serious public health issue as well.
枪支暴力通常被描述为一个单一的问题,但实际上它并不是一个统一的问题。相反,它有多种形式,是由多个因素复杂相互作用的结果。枪支暴力的后果也有很大的不同。它们可能是(a)身体上没有受伤(枪支被挥舞),(b)受伤但没有致命,或者(c)致命。为了有效地理解和解决枪支暴力问题,必须考虑到非致命性和致命性枪支暴力受害的各种风险因素,使用全面、比较的框架。我们提出了一个新颖的比较框架,以更好地理解枪支暴力,并为应对这种暴力制定政策反应。我们将枪支暴力分解为其各种形式,并提出了一个离散类别的风险因素概念化,每个类别都对政策干预有重要意义。虽然我们强调了这个框架对于理解和打击美国人际枪支暴力的价值,但这里讨论的研究和政策方法应该同样适用于其他将枪支暴力作为严重公共卫生问题的国际背景。