• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

羊水抗菌能力测定的微量法

Micromethod for determination of antibacterial capacity in amniotic fluid.

作者信息

Honkonen E, Lassila O, Erkkola R

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 1985 Jan;2(1):17-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999904.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-999904
PMID:3885965
Abstract

A new method for assessing antibacterial activity in amniotic fluid (AF) is presented. Sample sizes of 100 microliter were incubated at 37 degrees C in an equal amount of growth medium with inoculated bacteria. The quantification of bacterial growth was established by measuring the change in optical density with an automated spectrophotometer. In this study, Escherichia coli, type K 12, was used for inoculation and the bacterial growth was assessed after 6, 18, 30, 42, and 54 hours' incubation. The variation coefficients in intra-assay and interassay measurements were 3.8 and 5.2%, respectively. Shaking of the incubated sample significantly changed the results by increasing the number of viable cells in the most probable number method and decreasing the optical density difference in the spectrophotometric method. Nevertheless, the correlation between the results in both methods was good (r = 0.94, p less than 0.05, and r = 0.98, p less than 0.01, respectively). By filtering the AF sample before incubation, a great deal of antibacterial activity was removed. The reproducibility, simplicity, and rapidity of this spectrophotometric method of assessing antibacterial activity in AF may make it a useful clinical tool.

摘要

本文介绍了一种评估羊水(AF)抗菌活性的新方法。将100微升样本与接种细菌的等量生长培养基在37℃下孵育。通过使用自动分光光度计测量光密度变化来确定细菌生长的定量。在本研究中,使用K12型大肠杆菌进行接种,并在孵育6、18、30、42和54小时后评估细菌生长情况。批内和批间测量的变异系数分别为3.8%和5.2%。孵育样本的振荡显著改变了结果,在最大可能数法中增加了活细胞数量,在分光光度法中降低了光密度差异。然而,两种方法的结果之间相关性良好(分别为r = 0.94,p < 0.05,以及r = 0.98,p < 0.01)。通过在孵育前过滤AF样本,大量抗菌活性被去除。这种评估AF抗菌活性的分光光度法的重现性、简便性和快速性可能使其成为一种有用的临床工具。

相似文献

1
Micromethod for determination of antibacterial capacity in amniotic fluid.羊水抗菌能力测定的微量法
Am J Perinatol. 1985 Jan;2(1):17-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999904.
2
Antibacterial capacity in amniotic fluid in normal and complicated pregnancies.正常妊娠和复杂妊娠中羊水的抗菌能力
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl. 1987;202:14-6.
3
[A study on the antibacterial activity of amniotic fluid--the significance of intraamniotic transferrin].
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1986 Apr;38(4):461-9.
4
Bacterial growth inhibition by amniotic fluid. VIII. Evaluation of a radiometric bioassay for rapid, in vitro demonstration of phosphate-sensitive bacterial growth inhibitor in amniotic fluid.羊水对细菌生长的抑制作用。八、一种用于快速体外检测羊水中磷酸盐敏感型细菌生长抑制剂的放射性生物测定法的评估
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Sep 1;135(1):14-21.
5
The effect of filtration of amniotic fluid on the growth of Chlamydia trachomatis and Escherichia coli.羊水过滤对沙眼衣原体和大肠杆菌生长的影响。
Am J Perinatol. 1991 Jan;8(1):50-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999341.
6
Effect of amniotic fluid on bacterial growth.羊水对细菌生长的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Jan;49(1):35-7.
7
The effect of meconium staining of amniotic fluid on the growth of Escherichia coli and group B streptococcus.羊水胎粪污染对大肠杆菌和B族链球菌生长的影响。
J Perinatol. 2002 Sep;22(6):467-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210774.
8
Rapid detection of group B streptococcus and Escherichia coli in amniotic fluid using real-time fluorescent PCR.使用实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应快速检测羊水样本中的B族链球菌和大肠杆菌
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep-Dec;12(3-4):109-14. doi: 10.1080/10647440400020679.
9
Trace elements and antibacterial activity in amniotic fluid.羊水中的微量元素与抗菌活性。
Biol Neonate. 1986;50(1):21-6. doi: 10.1159/000242557.
10
Bacterial growth inhibition by amniotic fluid. IV. Studies on the nature of bacterial inhibition with the use of plate-count determinations.羊水对细菌生长的抑制作用。IV. 运用平板计数法对细菌抑制性质的研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Aug 1;122(7):814-9.