Almas Aysha, Hashmi Shiraz, Elahi Adil, Parkash O M, Sabir Sania, Iqbal Romaina
Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, PAKISTAN.
Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, PAKISTAN.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Apr 1;17(7):565-575. doi: 10.70252/JACS9712. eCollection 2024.
The purpose of this study is to compare physical activity measured by the wearable device Xiaomi Mi2 Band and self-reported physical activity by YPAQ in preadolescent school children. A pilot cross-sectional study was performed on a subsample (5%=n=60) of preadolescent children within a parallel-group feasibility intervention trial (n=1000). All children aged 9-11 years enrolled in the schools were included in the study and children with any physical disability were excluded. Self-reported physical activity was recorded through the modified version of the Youth Physical Activity Questionnaire (YPAQ) and automatic physical activity was measured by the Xiaomi Mi2 band over 7 days. Data from the Xiaomi Mi2 band was synchronized with its mobile application from where data was transferred to an excel sheet. Data on 7-day total physical activity in minutes and 7-day total step count were recorded by the Xiaomi Mi2 band. Student's t-tests were used to determine whether significant differences were present between self-reported physical activity and by Xiaomi Mi2 band. A Bland-Altman method was also used to assess the degree of agreement between the two methods of measuring physical activity. Mean ± SD age of the children was 9.6 (± 1.0) years and 31 (51.7 %) were boys. The mean ± SD time spent in physical activity reported by YPAQ was 457.5 (± 136) minutes and by the Xiaomi Mi2 band was 594.7 (± 183) minutes. The Bland-Altman plot identified a mean bias between the methods (YPAQ and Xiaomi Mi2 band) of -157.6 (95% CI: 296.3, -611.0) minutes of 7-day physical activity. Physical activity measured by a wearable device, the Xiaomi Mi2 band can give overestimated values of physical activity compared to self-reported physical activity in preadolescent school children. However, when PA is measured through step counts by the Xiaomi Mi2 band converted to minutes, it is comparable to PA measured by YPAQ.
本研究的目的是比较可穿戴设备小米手环2测量的身体活动与青少年儿童通过青少年身体活动问卷(YPAQ)自我报告的身体活动。在一项平行组可行性干预试验(n = 1000)中,对青少年儿童的一个子样本(5%=n = 60)进行了一项试点横断面研究。所有在学校就读的9至11岁儿童均纳入研究,排除任何身体残疾的儿童。通过青少年身体活动问卷(YPAQ)的修改版记录自我报告的身体活动,并通过小米手环2在7天内测量自动身体活动。小米手环2的数据与其移动应用程序同步,数据从该应用程序传输到电子表格中。小米手环2记录了以分钟为单位的7天总身体活动数据和7天总步数。使用学生t检验来确定自我报告的身体活动与小米手环2测量的身体活动之间是否存在显著差异。还使用Bland-Altman方法评估两种测量身体活动方法之间的一致性程度。儿童的平均年龄±标准差为9.6(±1.0)岁,31名(51.7%)为男孩。YPAQ报告的平均身体活动时间±标准差为457.5(±136)分钟,小米手环2测量的为594.7(±183)分钟。Bland-Altman图显示,两种方法(YPAQ和小米手环2)在7天身体活动中的平均偏差为-157.6(95%CI:296.3,-611.0)分钟。与青少年儿童自我报告的身体活动相比,可穿戴设备小米手环2测量的身体活动可能会给出高估的值。然而,当通过小米手环2将步数转换为分钟来测量身体活动时,它与YPAQ测量的身体活动相当。