Center for Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Therapeutics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Translational Center of Excellence for Neuroepidemiology and Neurology Outcomes Research, Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Aug;116(2):448-459. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3310. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
The global rise in polypharmacy has increased both the necessity and complexity of drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessments, given the growing potential for interactions involving more than two drugs. Leveraging large-scale healthcare claims data, we piloted a semi-automated, high-throughput case-crossover-based approach for drug-drug-drug interaction (3DI) screening. Cases were direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users with either a major bleeding event during ongoing dispensings for potentially interacting, enzyme-inhibiting antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) (Study 1), or a thromboembolic event during ongoing dispensings for potentially interacting, enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (ASMs) (Study 2). 3DI detection was based on screening for additional drug exposures that served as acute outcome triggers. To mitigate direct effects and confounding by concomitant drugs, self-controlled estimates were adjusted using negative cases (external "control" DOAC users with the same outcomes but co-dispensings for non-interacting AHDs or ASMs). Signal thresholds were set based on P-values and false discovery rate q-values to address multiple comparisons. Study 1: 285 drugs were examined among 3,306 episodes. Self-controlled assessments with q-value thresholds yielded 9 3DI signals (cases) and 40 DDI signals (negative cases). External adjustment generated 10 3DI signals from the P-value threshold and no signals from the q-value threshold. Study 2: 126 drugs were examined among 604 episodes. Assessments with P-value thresholds yielded 3 3DI and 26 DDI signals following self-control, as well as 4 3DI signals following adjustment. No 3DI signals met the q-value threshold. The presented self- and externally-controlled approach aimed to advance paradigms for real-world higher order drug interaction screening among high-susceptibility populations with pre-existent DDI risk.
全球范围内的多药治疗的增加增加了药物相互作用(DDI)评估的必要性和复杂性,因为涉及两种以上药物相互作用的潜在可能性越来越大。利用大规模的医疗保健索赔数据,我们试点了一种基于半自动化、高通量病例交叉的药物-药物-药物相互作用(3DI)筛选方法。病例是直接作用的口服抗凝剂(DOAC)使用者,在正在进行的潜在相互作用的酶抑制性降压药(AHD)(研究 1)或正在进行的潜在相互作用的酶诱导性抗癫痫药(ASM)(研究 2)配药期间发生主要出血事件。3DI 检测基于筛选额外的药物暴露,这些暴露作为急性结果触发因素。为了减轻直接效应和伴随药物的混杂影响,使用阴性病例(具有相同结局但同时配用非相互作用的 AHD 或 ASM 的外部“对照”DOAC 使用者)对自我对照估计进行调整。信号阈值是基于 P 值和错误发现率 q 值设定的,以解决多重比较问题。研究 1:在 3306 个病例中检查了 285 种药物。具有 q 值阈值的自我对照评估产生了 9 个 3DI 信号(病例)和 40 个 DDI 信号(阴性病例)。外部调整根据 P 值阈值产生了 10 个 3DI 信号,根据 q 值阈值没有信号。研究 2:在 604 个病例中检查了 126 种药物。在自我控制下,使用 P 值阈值评估产生了 3 个 3DI 和 26 个 DDI 信号,以及调整后的 4 个 3DI 信号。没有 3DI 信号达到 q 值阈值。所提出的自我和外部控制方法旨在为具有预先存在的 DDI 风险的高易感性人群的真实世界中更高阶药物相互作用筛选推进范例。