• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Core sepsis-related competencies for medical students: an international consensus by Delphi technique.医学生核心脓毒症相关能力:德尔菲技术国际共识。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 11;24(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05525-9.
2
Defining core competencies in transfusion medicine for resident physicians: A multi-specialty Delphi consensus study.定义住院医师输血医学核心能力:多专业德尔菲共识研究。
Transfusion. 2021 Mar;61(3):939-947. doi: 10.1111/trf.16249. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
Validating competencies for an undergraduate training program in rural medicine using the Delphi technique.运用德尔菲法验证农村医学本科培训项目的能力要求
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Oct-Dec;16(4):3851. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
Consensus on global health competencies for Korean medical students using a modified Delphi method.采用改良 Delphi 法对韩国医学生全球健康能力的共识。
Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Dec;35(4):389-405. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.275. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
5
Defining core competencies for telehealth in healthcare higher education: A Delphi study.界定高等医学教育中远程医疗的核心能力:一项德尔菲研究。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2025 Feb;75:103244. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103244. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
6
Using a Modified Delphi Method for Identifying Competencies in a Syrian Undergraduate Neonatology Curriculum.采用改良德尔菲法确定叙利亚本科新生儿学课程的能力
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Nov;27(11):1921-1929. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03719-z. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
7
Core procedural skills competencies and the maintenance of procedural skills for medical students: a Delphi study.核心程序技能能力和医学生程序技能的维持:一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03323-9.
8
Consensus Competencies for Postgraduate Fellowship Training in Global Neurology.全球神经学研究生奖学金培训的共识能力。
Neurology. 2023 Aug 22;101(8):357-368. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207184. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
9
The Digital Health Competencies in Medical Education Framework: An International Consensus Statement Based on a Delphi Study.医学教育框架中的数字健康能力:基于德尔菲研究的国际共识声明
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453131. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53131.
10
Consensus views on competencies and teaching methods for an interprofessional curriculum on complementary and integrative medicine: A Delphi study.共识观点对能力和教学方法的跨专业课程的补充和综合医学:德尔菲研究。
J Integr Med. 2021 May;19(3):282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, practice and attitudes of healthcare students to sepsis management in Jamaica.牙买加医学生对脓毒症管理的知识、实践和态度。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07122-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic evaluation of quick sequential organ failure assessment score in ICU patients with sepsis across different income settings.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对不同收入设定 ICU 脓毒症患者预后评估的比较。
Crit Care. 2024 Jan 23;28(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04804-7.
2
Use of Delphi in health sciences research: A narrative review.德尔菲法在健康科学研究中的应用:叙述性综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 17;102(7):e32829. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032829.
3
Competency-Based Frameworks in Medical School Education Programs: A Thematic Analysis of the Academic Medicine Snapshots, 2020.医学院校教育项目中的能力本位框架:2020 年学术医学快照的主题分析。
Acad Med. 2022 Nov 1;97(11S):S63-S70. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004912. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
4
Executive Summary: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.执行摘要:拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):1974-1982. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005357.
5
Sepsis in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019: how often and how severe?新冠肺炎住院患者中的脓毒症:有多常见?有多严重?
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2021 Oct 1;27(5):474-479. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000861.
6
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
7
Development of an Undergraduate Medical Education Critical Care Content Outline Utilizing the Delphi Method.利用德尔菲法制定本科医学教育重症监护内容大纲
Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan;48(1):98-103. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004086.
8
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
9
The practice of intensive care in Latin America: a survey of academic intensivists.拉丁美洲的重症监护实践:对学术重症医学专家的调查。
Crit Care. 2018 Feb 21;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1956-6.
10
International Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines 2016: the perspective from low-income and middle-income countries.《2016年国际脓毒症存活指南:低收入和中等收入国家视角》
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;17(9):893-895. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30453-X.

医学生核心脓毒症相关能力:德尔菲技术国际共识。

Core sepsis-related competencies for medical students: an international consensus by Delphi technique.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 11;24(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05525-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-05525-9
PMID:38862952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11167876/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition which may arise from infection in any organ system and requires early recognition and management. Healthcare professionals working in any specialty may need to manage patients with sepsis. Educating medical students about this condition may be an effective way to ensure all future doctors have sufficient ability to diagnose and treat septic patients. However, there is currently no consensus on what competencies medical students should achieve regarding sepsis recognition and treatment. This study aims to outline what sepsis-related competencies medical students should achieve by the end of their medical student training in both high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions and in low or lower-middle income countries/regions.

METHODS

Two separate panels from high or upper-middle income and low or lower-middle income countries/regions participated in a Delphi method to suggest and rank sepsis competencies for medical students. Each panel consisted of 13-18 key stakeholders of medical education and doctors in specialties where sepsis is a common problem (both specialists and trainees). Panelists came from all continents, except Antarctica.

RESULTS

The panels reached consensus on 38 essential sepsis competencies in low or lower-middle income countries/regions and 33 in high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions. These include competencies such as definition of sepsis and septic shock and urgency of antibiotic treatment. In the low or lower-middle income countries/regions group, consensus was also achieved for competencies ranked as very important, and was achieved in 4/5 competencies rated as moderately important. In the high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions group, consensus was achieved in 41/57 competencies rated as very important but only 6/11 competencies rated as moderately important.

CONCLUSION

Medical schools should consider developing curricula to address essential competencies, as a minimum, but also consider addressing competencies rated as very or moderately important.

摘要

背景

败血症是一种危及生命的病症,可能由任何系统的感染引起,需要早期识别和治疗。任何专业的医疗保健专业人员都可能需要管理败血症患者。教育医学生了解这种情况可能是确保所有未来医生都有足够能力诊断和治疗败血症患者的有效方法。然而,目前对于医学生在败血症识别和治疗方面应达到哪些能力尚无共识。本研究旨在概述医学生在高收入或中上收入国家/地区和低收入或中下收入国家/地区的医学学生培训结束时应达到的与败血症相关的能力。

方法

来自高收入或中上收入和低收入或中下收入国家/地区的两个独立小组参加了德尔菲法,以提出并对医学生的败血症能力进行排名。每个小组由 13-18 名医学教育的关键利益相关者和在败血症是常见问题的专业中的医生(包括专家和受训者)组成。小组成员来自除南极洲以外的所有大洲。

结果

小组就低或中下收入国家/地区的 38 项基本败血症能力和高或中上收入国家/地区的 33 项基本败血症能力达成共识。这些能力包括败血症和感染性休克的定义以及抗生素治疗的紧迫性等。在低或中下收入国家/地区组中,对被评为非常重要的能力也达成了共识,对被评为中等重要的能力也达成了共识。在高或中上收入国家/地区组中,对被评为非常重要的 41/57 项能力达成了共识,但对被评为中等重要的能力仅达成了共识 6/11。

结论

医学院应考虑制定课程以满足基本能力要求,但也应考虑解决被评为非常重要或中等重要的能力。