Suppr超能文献

如何优化关于动物研究方法和无动物研究方法的沟通。

How to optimize communication about animal and animal-free research methods.

作者信息

Homberg Judith Regina, Piersma Aldert H, Krul Cyrille A M, Genzel Lisa, Kienhuis Anne, Ter Gast Ellen, Wolvekamp Monique

机构信息

Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Centre for Health Protection, RIVM, Bilthoven, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2024 May 28;11:1303744. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1303744. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

There is a long-standing debate about experimental non-human animals and animal-free methods in scientific research. Among the various stakeholders involved in the debate are the scientists. During media broadcasts we, animal researchers and animal-free methods researchers, were positioned as 'opponents'. In this essay we describe our initial rational thoughts and emotions after these events, and how we came together to explore our common ground on animal(-free) experimentation. Realizing that all models have advantages and limitations, our common ground lies in the principles of good scientific research and responsible experimentation. Our communication emanating from the broadcasts has been instrumental in improving communication on animal(-free) experimentation issues by teaming up. We strongly believe that this is essential for making well-informed decisions for the methods we are using now and will be using in the future.

摘要

关于科学研究中的实验用非人类动物和无动物方法,一直存在着争论。参与这场争论的众多利益相关者中包括科学家。在媒体报道中,我们,动物研究人员和无动物方法研究人员,被定位为“对手”。在本文中,我们描述了这些事件发生后我们最初的理性思考和情绪,以及我们如何共同探讨在动物(无动物)实验方面的共同点。认识到所有模型都有优点和局限性,我们的共同点在于良好科学研究和负责任实验的原则。我们从这些报道中开展的交流,通过合作对改善动物(无动物)实验问题的沟通起到了推动作用。我们坚信,这对于就我们现在正在使用以及未来将要使用的方法做出明智决策至关重要。

相似文献

1
How to optimize communication about animal and animal-free research methods.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 May 28;11:1303744. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1303744. eCollection 2024.
4
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
6
The use of nonhuman animals in biomedical research.
Am J Med Sci. 2011 Oct;342(4):305-13. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31822a6c35.
8
Where are we in the study of animal emotions?
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;7(5):354-62. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1399. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
9
They see a rat, we seek a cure for diseases: the current status of animal experimentation in medical practice.
Med Princ Pract. 2013;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):52-61. doi: 10.1159/000355504. Epub 2013 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A multidimensional approach to the self in non-human animals through the Pattern Theory of Self.
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 9;16:1561420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1561420. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond Animal Testing Index: Benchmarking tool for a world beyond animal testing.
ALTEX. 2024 Jan 9;41(1):69-75. doi: 10.14573/altex.2304161. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
2
How the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the necessity of animal research.
Curr Biol. 2020 Sep 21;30(18):R1014-R1018. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验