Homberg Judith Regina, Piersma Aldert H, Krul Cyrille A M, Genzel Lisa, Kienhuis Anne, Ter Gast Ellen, Wolvekamp Monique
Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Centre for Health Protection, RIVM, Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 May 28;11:1303744. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1303744. eCollection 2024.
There is a long-standing debate about experimental non-human animals and animal-free methods in scientific research. Among the various stakeholders involved in the debate are the scientists. During media broadcasts we, animal researchers and animal-free methods researchers, were positioned as 'opponents'. In this essay we describe our initial rational thoughts and emotions after these events, and how we came together to explore our common ground on animal(-free) experimentation. Realizing that all models have advantages and limitations, our common ground lies in the principles of good scientific research and responsible experimentation. Our communication emanating from the broadcasts has been instrumental in improving communication on animal(-free) experimentation issues by teaming up. We strongly believe that this is essential for making well-informed decisions for the methods we are using now and will be using in the future.
关于科学研究中的实验用非人类动物和无动物方法,一直存在着争论。参与这场争论的众多利益相关者中包括科学家。在媒体报道中,我们,动物研究人员和无动物方法研究人员,被定位为“对手”。在本文中,我们描述了这些事件发生后我们最初的理性思考和情绪,以及我们如何共同探讨在动物(无动物)实验方面的共同点。认识到所有模型都有优点和局限性,我们的共同点在于良好科学研究和负责任实验的原则。我们从这些报道中开展的交流,通过合作对改善动物(无动物)实验问题的沟通起到了推动作用。我们坚信,这对于就我们现在正在使用以及未来将要使用的方法做出明智决策至关重要。