Radboud University, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center, Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Curr Biol. 2020 Sep 21;30(18):R1014-R1018. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
Recently, a petition was offered to the European Commission calling for an immediate ban on animal testing. Although a Europe-wide moratorium on the use of animals in science is not yet possible, there has been a push by the non-scientific community and politicians for a rapid transition to animal-free innovations. Although there are benefits for both animal welfare and researchers, advances on alternative methods have not progressed enough to be able to replace animal research in the foreseeable future. This trend has led first and foremost to a substantial increase in the administrative burden and hurdles required to make timely advances in research and treatments for human and animal diseases. The current COVID-19 pandemic clearly highlights how much we actually rely on animal research. COVID-19 affects several organs and systems, and the various animal-free alternatives currently available do not come close to this complexity. In this Essay, we therefore argue that the use of animals is essential for the advancement of human and veterinary health.
最近,有人向欧盟委员会提交了一份请愿书,呼吁立即禁止动物实验。尽管在欧洲范围内全面禁止在科学研究中使用动物目前还不可能,但非科学界和政界人士一直在推动迅速向无动物创新过渡。虽然这对动物福利和研究人员都有好处,但替代方法的进展还不足以在可预见的未来能够替代动物研究。这种趋势首先导致了在人类和动物疾病的研究和治疗方面取得及时进展所需的行政负担和障碍大大增加。当前的 COVID-19 大流行清楚地表明,我们实际上在多大程度上依赖于动物研究。COVID-19 影响多个器官和系统,而目前可用的各种无动物替代品远远无法达到这种复杂性。因此,在本文中,我们认为,动物的使用对于人类和兽医健康的进步是必不可少的。