文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

中国短视频作为胃食管反流病健康信息来源的现状:一项横断面研究。

The status quo of short video as sources of health information on gastroesophageal reflux disease in China: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Gaoxin Branch of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 May 28;12:1400749. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1400749. eCollection 2024.


DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1400749
PMID:38864023
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11165113/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positive lifestyle adjustments have become effective methods in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Utilizing short video platforms to encourage GERD patients for effective self-disease management is a convenient and cost-effective approach. However, the quality of GERD-related videos on short video platforms is yet to be determined, and these videos may contain misinformation that patients cannot recognize. This study aims to assess the information quality of GERD-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili in China. METHODS: Search and filter the top 100 GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili based on comprehensive rankings. Two independent gastroenterologists conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the video quality using the Global Quality Score and the modified DISCERN tool. Simultaneously, the content of the videos was analyzed across six aspects: definition, symptoms, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 164 GERD-related videos were collected in this study, and videos from non-gastrointestinal health professionals constitute the majority (56.71%), with only 28.66% originating from gastroenterology health professionals. The overall quality and reliability of the videos were relatively low, with DISCERN and GQS scores of 2 (IQR: 2-3) and 3 (IQR: 2-3), respectively. Relatively speaking, videos from gastrointestinal health professionals exhibit the highest reliability and quality, with DISCERN scores of 3 (IQR: 3-4) and GQS scores of 3 (IQR: 3-4), respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall, the information content and quality of GERD-related videos still need improvement. In the future, health professionals are required to provide high-quality videos to facilitate effective self-disease management for GERD patients.

摘要

背景:积极的生活方式调整已成为治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的有效方法。利用短视频平台鼓励 GERD 患者进行有效的自我疾病管理是一种方便且具有成本效益的方法。然而,短视频平台上与 GERD 相关的视频质量尚未确定,这些视频可能包含患者无法识别的错误信息。本研究旨在评估中国 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上与 GERD 相关的短视频的信息质量。

方法:根据综合排名,搜索并筛选 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上排名前 100 的与 GERD 相关的视频。两名独立的胃肠病学家使用全球质量评分和改良的 DISCERN 工具对视频质量进行全面评估。同时,从六个方面分析视频内容:定义、症状、危险因素、诊断、治疗和结果。

结果:本研究共收集了 164 个与 GERD 相关的视频,其中大部分(56.71%)来自非胃肠健康专业人士,只有 28.66%来自胃肠病学健康专业人士。视频的整体质量和可靠性相对较低,DISCERN 和 GQS 评分分别为 2(IQR:2-3)和 3(IQR:2-3)。相对而言,来自胃肠健康专业人士的视频具有最高的可靠性和质量,DISCERN 评分分别为 3(IQR:3-4)和 GQS 评分分别为 3(IQR:3-4)。

结论:总体而言,与 GERD 相关的视频的信息内容和质量仍有待提高。未来,健康专业人员需要提供高质量的视频,以方便 GERD 患者进行有效的自我疾病管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/11165113/09bd003300bb/fpubh-12-1400749-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/11165113/dd70b41f3cd3/fpubh-12-1400749-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/11165113/958077589334/fpubh-12-1400749-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/11165113/09bd003300bb/fpubh-12-1400749-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/11165113/dd70b41f3cd3/fpubh-12-1400749-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/11165113/958077589334/fpubh-12-1400749-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/11165113/09bd003300bb/fpubh-12-1400749-g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
The status quo of short video as sources of health information on gastroesophageal reflux disease in China: a cross-sectional study.

Front Public Health. 2024

[2]
Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-7-5

[3]
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.

BMC Public Health. 2024-6-14

[4]
TikTok and Bilibili as health information sources on gastroesophageal reflux disease: an assessment of content and its quality.

Dis Esophagus. 2024-11-28

[5]
The Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Coronary Heart Disease Information on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.

JMIR Form Res. 2024-9-3

[6]
The quality and reliability of short videos about thyroid nodules on BiliBili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study.

Digit Health. 2024-10-7

[7]
TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: A content and quality analysis.

Helicobacter. 2023-10

[8]
Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China.

Front Public Health. 2024-1-22

[9]
The status quo of short videos as a health information source of : a cross-sectional study.

Front Public Health. 2023

[10]
Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-2-8

引用本文的文献

[1]
Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024-12-11

本文引用的文献

[1]
The status quo of short videos as a health information source of : a cross-sectional study.

Front Public Health. 2023

[2]
YouTube as a Patient Information Source for Gastrointestinal Reflux Disease.

Cureus. 2023-11-20

[3]
The quality and reliability of TikTok videos on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a propensity score matching analysis.

Front Public Health. 2023

[4]
TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: A content and quality analysis.

Helicobacter. 2023-10

[5]
The Reliability and Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Dietary Guidance for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Cross-sectional Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-2-9

[6]
Short-Video Apps as a Health Information Source for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Information Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos.

J Med Internet Res. 2021-12-20

[7]
From health education to digital health literacy - building on the past to shape the future.

Glob Health Promot. 2021-12

[8]
TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos.

J Med Internet Res. 2021-9-1

[9]
Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome.

Nat Med. 2021-4

[10]
Study on the relationship of depression, anxiety, lifestyle and eating habits with the severity of reflux esophagitis.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2021-3-20

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索