• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短视频作为炎症性肠病饮食指导来源的可靠性和质量:横断面研究。

The Reliability and Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Dietary Guidance for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Cross-sectional Study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Changhai Clinical Research Unit, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 9;25:e41518. doi: 10.2196/41518.

DOI:10.2196/41518
PMID:36757757
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9951074/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dietary management is considered a potential adjunctive treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Short-video sharing platforms have enabled patients to obtain dietary advice more conveniently. However, accessing useful resources while avoiding misinformation is not an easy task for most patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the quality of the information in IBD diet-related videos on Chinese short-video sharing platforms.

METHODS

We collected and extracted information from a total of 125 video samples related to the IBD diet on the 3 Chinese short-video sharing platforms with the most users: TikTok, Bilibili, and Kwai. Two independent physicians evaluated each video in terms of content comprehensiveness, quality (rated by Global Quality Score), and reliability (rated by a modified DISCERN tool). Finally, comparative analyses of the videos from different sources were conducted.

RESULTS

The videos were classified into 6 groups based on the identity of the uploaders, which included 3 kinds of medical professionals (ie, gastroenterologists, nongastroenterologists, and clinical nutritionists) and 3 types of non-medical professionals (ie, nonprofit organizations, individual science communicators, and IBD patients). The overall quality of the videos was poor. Further group comparisons demonstrated that videos from medical professionals were more instructive in terms of content comprehensiveness, quality, and reliability than those from non-medical professionals. Moreover, IBD diet-related recommendations from clinical nutritionists and gastroenterologists were of better quality than those from nongastroenterologists, while recommendations from nonprofit organizations did not seem to be superior to other groups of uploaders.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall quality of the information in IBD diet-related videos is unsatisfactory and varies significantly depending on the source. Videos from medical professionals, especially clinical nutritionists and gastroenterologists, may provide dietary guidance with higher quality for IBD patients.

摘要

背景

饮食管理被认为是炎症性肠病(IBD)的一种潜在辅助治疗方法。短视频分享平台使患者能够更方便地获得饮食建议。然而,对于大多数患者来说,获取有用资源的同时避免错误信息并非易事。

目的

本研究旨在评估中国短视频分享平台上与 IBD 饮食相关的视频信息质量。

方法

我们从用户最多的 3 个中国短视频分享平台(TikTok、Bilibili 和快手)上共收集和提取了 125 个与 IBD 饮食相关的视频样本。两名独立医生根据内容全面性、质量(由全球质量评分评定)和可靠性(由改良的 DISCERN 工具评定)对每个视频进行评估。最后,对来自不同来源的视频进行了比较分析。

结果

根据上传者的身份,将视频分为 6 组,包括 3 种医疗专业人员(即胃肠病学家、非胃肠病学家和临床营养师)和 3 种非医疗专业人员(即非营利组织、个体科学传播者和 IBD 患者)。视频的整体质量较差。进一步的组间比较表明,医疗专业人员的视频在内容全面性、质量和可靠性方面比非医疗专业人员的视频更具指导意义。此外,临床营养师和胃肠病学家的 IBD 饮食相关建议质量优于非胃肠病学家,而非营利组织的建议似乎并不优于其他上传者。

结论

IBD 饮食相关视频的信息整体质量不尽如人意,且差异显著,取决于来源。来自医疗专业人员的视频,特别是临床营养师和胃肠病学家的视频,可能为 IBD 患者提供质量更高的饮食指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d0/9951074/ffa929cd4780/jmir_v25i1e41518_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d0/9951074/2e0203377077/jmir_v25i1e41518_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d0/9951074/137e29f6d882/jmir_v25i1e41518_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d0/9951074/ffa929cd4780/jmir_v25i1e41518_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d0/9951074/2e0203377077/jmir_v25i1e41518_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d0/9951074/137e29f6d882/jmir_v25i1e41518_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d0/9951074/ffa929cd4780/jmir_v25i1e41518_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
The Reliability and Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Dietary Guidance for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Cross-sectional Study.短视频作为炎症性肠病饮食指导来源的可靠性和质量:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 9;25:e41518. doi: 10.2196/41518.
2
Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.肝癌相关短视频在 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上的质量与可靠性:一项横断面内容分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 5;25:e47210. doi: 10.2196/47210.
3
The Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Coronary Heart Disease Information on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.短视频质量作为 TikTok 冠心病信息来源的研究:横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 3;8:e51513. doi: 10.2196/51513.
4
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
5
Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube as sources of information on gastric cancer: assessment and analysis of the content and quality.哔哩哔哩、抖音和 YouTube 作为胃癌信息来源:内容和质量评估与分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17323-x.
6
The status quo of short videos as a health information source of : a cross-sectional study.短视频作为健康信息来源的现状:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;11:1344212. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1344212. eCollection 2023.
7
TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: A content and quality analysis.中国的TikTok和哔哩哔哩作为幽门螺杆菌信息来源:内容与质量分析
Helicobacter. 2023 Oct;28(5):e13007. doi: 10.1111/hel.13007. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
8
Short-Video Apps as a Health Information Source for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Information Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos.短视频应用作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病的健康信息来源:TikTok 视频的信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 20;23(12):e28318. doi: 10.2196/28318.
9
TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos.TikTok 作为健康信息来源:糖尿病相关视频信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 1;23(9):e30409. doi: 10.2196/30409.
10
Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上乳腺癌相关视频的可靠性和质量评估:中国的横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 22;11:1296386. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1296386. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood or buzz? Decoding the quality of CBC-related short videos on Chinese platforms.血液还是热度?解读中国平台上与血常规相关短视频的质量
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 8;11:20552076251375721. doi: 10.1177/20552076251375721. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Quality and reliability of prostate cancer-Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-sectional content analysis study.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上前列腺癌相关视频的质量与可靠性:横断面内容分析研究
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 3;11:20552076251376263. doi: 10.1177/20552076251376263. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Assessing the quality of myopia prevention videos on Chinese short video platforms: a cross-sectional content analysis by source.

本文引用的文献

1
Intake of Ultra-processed Foods Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Crohn's Disease: A Cross-sectional and Prospective Analysis of 187 154 Participants in the UK Biobank.超加工食品的摄入与克罗恩病风险增加相关:英国生物库中 187154 名参与者的横断面和前瞻性分析。
J Crohns Colitis. 2023 Apr 19;17(4):535-552. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac167.
2
A randomized trial of comparing video telecare education vs. in-person education on dietary regimen compliance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a support for clinical telehealth Providers.一项比较视频远程医疗教育与面对面教育对 2 型糖尿病患者饮食方案依从性影响的随机试验:为临床远程医疗服务提供者提供支持。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 May 2;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01032-4.
3
评估中国短视频平台上近视预防视频的质量:基于来源的横断面内容分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 21;15(8):e102818. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102818.
4
Evaluation of the quality and reliability of Chinese content about orthognathic surgery on BiliBili and TikTok: a cross-sectional study.哔哩哔哩和抖音上正颌外科中文内容的质量与可靠性评估:一项横断面研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 7;15(1):28967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13941-0.
5
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Providing Nutritional Recommendations for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.评估YouTube上为肠易激综合征提供营养建议的视频的质量和可靠性。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Aug;38(4):e70088. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70088.
6
Assessment of information quality and reliability on ankle sprains in short videos from Douyin and Bilibili.对抖音和哔哩哔哩短视频中踝关节扭伤信息质量和可靠性的评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07656-5.
7
Search engines and short video apps as sources of information on acute pancreatitis in China: quality assessment and content assessment.中国搜索引擎和短视频应用作为急性胰腺炎信息来源的质量评估与内容评估
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 4;13:1578076. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1578076. eCollection 2025.
8
The quality and reliability of short videos about premature ovarian failure on Bilibili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study.哔哩哔哩和抖音上关于卵巢早衰短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 17;11:20552076251351077. doi: 10.1177/20552076251351077. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
9
Status of short videos as health information sources for chronic pancreatitis in China: a cross-sectional study.中国短视频作为慢性胰腺炎健康信息来源的现状:一项横断面研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04005-8.
10
Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study.社交短视频平台上胰腺癌相关视频内容的质量与可靠性评估:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 24;25(1):1919. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23130-3.
Physician education can minimize inappropriate steroid use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: the ACTION study.
医生教育可将炎症性肠病患者不适当使用类固醇的情况降至最低:ACTION研究。
Intest Res. 2022 Oct;20(4):452-463. doi: 10.5217/ir.2021.00125. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
4
Nutrition in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Narrative Review.炎症性肠病患者的营养治疗:叙述性综述。
Nutrients. 2022 Feb 10;14(4):751. doi: 10.3390/nu14040751.
5
Short-Video Apps as a Health Information Source for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Information Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos.短视频应用作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病的健康信息来源:TikTok 视频的信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 20;23(12):e28318. doi: 10.2196/28318.
6
TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos.TikTok 作为健康信息来源:糖尿病相关视频信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 1;23(9):e30409. doi: 10.2196/30409.
7
Social media in inflammatory bowel disease: the patient and physician perspective.社交媒体在炎症性肠病中的应用:患者和医生的视角。
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 1;37(4):328-335. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000742.
8
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.社交媒体健康类错误信息的流行情况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187.
9
Interventions to support consumer evaluation of online health information credibility: A scoping review.干预措施以支持消费者对在线健康信息可信度的评估:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104321. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
10
The four epidemiological stages in the global evolution of inflammatory bowel disease.炎症性肠病全球演变的四个流行病学阶段。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;18(1):56-66. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-00360-x. Epub 2020 Oct 8.