Suppr超能文献

抖音和哔哩哔哩上胃食管反流病的视频质量评估与分析:横断面研究

Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Liang Ying, Xia Jianlei, Huo Wenting, Liu Bangjie, Wang Zhangyu, Ding Yanbing, Wu Keyan

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.

School of Nursing and School of Public Health, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Dec 11;17:5927-5939. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S485781. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili.

BACKGROUND

Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD videos on TikTok and Bilibili; however, the quality of information in these videos remains unknown.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey on two video platforms.

METHODS

In November 2023, we retrieved 200 videos from TikTok and Bilibili with the search term "GERD." Basic video information was extracted, the content coded, and the video source identified. Two independent raters assessed the quality of each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) tool.

RESULTS

A total of 156 videos were collected. Most of the videos on TikTok and Bilibili came from gastroenterologists. TikTok's GERD video quality and reliability were higher than Bilibili's. The mDISCERN and GQS scores of both platforms were positively correlated with duration, and the GQS score was positively correlated with collection and shares. Bilibili's JAMA score was negatively correlated with time-sync comments, and TikTok's JAMA score was negatively correlated with days since upload.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that the content quality scores of TikTok and Bilibili as sources of scientific information on GERD are average, and patients should carefully identify and select to watch GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

By evaluating the quality of videos on GERD on the two platforms, this can provide new ideas for health education interventions in the clinic and a relevant basis for improving the quality level of the videos.

摘要

目的与目标

评估TikTok和哔哩哔哩上胃食管反流病(GERD)视频的内容质量和可靠性。

背景

由于许多胃食管反流病患者利用当前的在线平台搜索健康信息,因此有必要评估社交媒体上胃食管反流病视频的质量。TikTok和哔哩哔哩上有许多胃食管反流病视频;然而,这些视频中的信息质量仍然未知。

设计

对两个视频平台进行横断面调查。

方法

2023年11月,我们在TikTok和哔哩哔哩上检索了200条标题中含有“GERD”的视频。提取基本视频信息,对内容进行编码,并确定视频来源。两名独立评分者使用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准、改良的DISCERN(mDISCERN)标准和全球质量评分(GQS)工具评估每个视频的质量。

结果

共收集到156个视频。TikTok和哔哩哔哩上的大多数视频来自胃肠病学家。TikTok上胃食管反流病视频的质量和可靠性高于哔哩哔哩。两个平台的mDISCERN和GQS评分与视频时长呈正相关,GQS评分与收藏量和分享量呈正相关。哔哩哔哩的JAMA评分与同步评论时间呈负相关,TikTok的JAMA评分与上传天数呈负相关。

结论

本研究表明,TikTok和哔哩哔哩作为胃食管反流病科学信息来源的内容质量评分处于中等水平,患者在TikTok和哔哩哔哩上观看胃食管反流病相关视频时应仔细甄别和选择。

与临床实践的相关性

通过评估这两个平台上胃食管反流病视频的质量,可为临床健康教育干预提供新思路,并为提高视频质量水平提供相关依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef3/11646458/2ddbe847ac58/JMDH-17-5927-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验