• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过眼球转动、手动计数和数字图像分析对Ki-67标记指数进行定量的比较研究;一种谨慎的方法。

Comparative Study of Ki-67 Labeling Index Quantification by Eye-rolling, Manual Count, and Digital Image Analysis; An Approach with Caution.

作者信息

Singh Aminder, Narang Vikram, Soni Ankita, Angural Kajal, Jindal Saveena, Garg Bhavna, Kaur Harpreet

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

出版信息

Iran J Pathol. 2024 Winter;19(1):75-80. doi: 10.30699/IJP.2024.2008346.3150. Epub 2024 Mar 29.

DOI:10.30699/IJP.2024.2008346.3150
PMID:38864080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11164310/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

An accurate Ki-67 labeling index assessment is critical for managing a few tumors, like breast carcinomas and neuroendocrine tumors. We aimed to determine the degree of agreement between digital image analysis (DIA) and eye-rolling assessment (EE) and DIA and manual count (MC) for Ki-67 LI scoring.

METHODS

A total of 120 cases (both tru-cut biopsies and resected specimens) were selected during the study period from the institutional database, wherein the Ki-67 labeling index was performed. The selected cases were divided into two groups, i.e., breast neoplasms and other neoplasms. The correlation between DIA and EE and DIA and MC for Ki-67 LI scoring was calculated in both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 113 cases were analyzed for Ki-67 LI by three different methods (EE, MC, and DIA); 7 cases were rejected due to poor image quality. Ki-67 LI scoring by DIA and EE was highly correlated in both study groups with a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of 0.809 (=0.01) and 0.904 (=0.01), respectively. Correlation between DIA and MC methods was also found to be almost perfect in both study groups with a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of 0.974 (=0.01) and 0.955 (=0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

ImmunoRatio is a free web-based digital image analysis application that can be used for Ki-67 LI assessment with considerable reliability and reproducibility. Yet, it carries a few limitations and demands a careful approach and final confirmation by an expert.

摘要

背景与目的

准确评估Ki-67标记指数对于管理某些肿瘤(如乳腺癌和神经内分泌肿瘤)至关重要。我们旨在确定数字图像分析(DIA)与人工目测评估(EE)以及DIA与手工计数(MC)在Ki-67标记指数(LI)评分方面的一致性程度。

方法

在研究期间从机构数据库中选取了120例病例(包括粗针活检和切除标本),并对其进行Ki-67标记指数检测。所选病例分为两组,即乳腺肿瘤和其他肿瘤。在两组中分别计算DIA与EE以及DIA与MC在Ki-67 LI评分方面的相关性。

结果

通过三种不同方法(EE、MC和DIA)对总共113例病例进行了Ki-67 LI分析;7例因图像质量差被排除。在两个研究组中,DIA与EE的Ki-67 LI评分高度相关,Spearman等级相关系数分别为0.809(P<0.01)和0.904(P<0.)。在两个研究组中,DIA与MC方法之间的相关性也几乎为完美,Spearman等级相关系数分别为0.974(P<0.01)和0.955(P<0.01)。

结论

ImmunoRatio是一款基于网络的免费数字图像分析应用程序,可用于Ki-67 LI评估,具有较高的可靠性和可重复性。然而,它也有一些局限性,需要谨慎使用并由专家进行最终确认。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554a/11164310/d44ad261e595/ijp-19-75-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554a/11164310/57dabb3dac07/ijp-19-75-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554a/11164310/f3094af9a207/ijp-19-75-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554a/11164310/d44ad261e595/ijp-19-75-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554a/11164310/57dabb3dac07/ijp-19-75-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554a/11164310/f3094af9a207/ijp-19-75-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554a/11164310/d44ad261e595/ijp-19-75-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Study of Ki-67 Labeling Index Quantification by Eye-rolling, Manual Count, and Digital Image Analysis; An Approach with Caution.通过眼球转动、手动计数和数字图像分析对Ki-67标记指数进行定量的比较研究;一种谨慎的方法。
Iran J Pathol. 2024 Winter;19(1):75-80. doi: 10.30699/IJP.2024.2008346.3150. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
2
Objective quantification of the Ki67 proliferative index in neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a comparison of digital image analysis with manual methods.目的:定量分析胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤的 Ki67 增殖指数:数字图像分析与手动方法的比较。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Dec;36(12):1761-70. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318263207c.
3
A Comparison of Visual Assessment and Automated Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer.乳腺癌中Ki67标记指数的视觉评估与自动数字图像分析比较
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 29;11(2):e0150505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150505. eCollection 2016.
4
Clinical usefulness of the free web-based image analysis application ImmunoRatio for assessment of Ki-67 labelling index in breast cancer.基于网络的免费图像分析应用程序ImmunoRatio在评估乳腺癌Ki-67标记指数中的临床实用性。
J Clin Pathol. 2017 Aug;70(8):715-719. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204162. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
5
Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.基于全组织切片虚拟双重染色的乳腺癌 Ki67 增殖指数的数字图像分析:临床验证和平台间一致性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 May;169(1):33-42. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4669-2. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
6
Validity and reliability of Ki-67 assessment in oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer.雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌中Ki-67评估的有效性和可靠性
Pathology. 2017 Jun;49(4):371-378. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
7
Grading pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms by Ki-67 staining on cytology cell blocks: manual count and digital image analysis of 58 cases.通过细胞学细胞块上的Ki-67染色对胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤进行分级:58例的手工计数和数字图像分析
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2016 Sep-Oct;5(5):286-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
8
Ki-67 Proliferation Index Assessment in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Digital Image Analysis With Stringent Case and Hotspot Level Concordance Requirements.采用严格的病例和热点水平一致性要求的数字图像分析评估胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤的 Ki-67 增殖指数。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Sep 8;156(4):607-619. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa275.
9
Comparison of the methods for measuring the Ki-67 labeling index in adrenocortical carcinoma: manual versus digital image analysis.肾上腺皮质癌中Ki-67标记指数测量方法的比较:手动与数字图像分析
Hum Pathol. 2016 Jul;53:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.10.017. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
10
Practical approaches to automated digital image analysis of Ki-67 labeling index in 997 breast carcinomas and causes of discordance with visual assessment.997 例乳腺癌中 Ki-67 标记指数自动化数字图像分析的实用方法及与视觉评估不一致的原因。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0212309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212309. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Ki-67 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Invasive Breast Cancer.Ki-67作为浸润性乳腺癌的预后生物标志物
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 3;13(17):4455. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174455.
2
Prognostic significance of histologic grade and Ki-67 proliferation index in follicular lymphoma.滤泡性淋巴瘤组织学分级和 Ki-67 增殖指数的预后意义。
Hematol Oncol. 2020 Dec;38(5):665-672. doi: 10.1002/hon.2778. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
3
Comparison of different anti-Ki67 antibody clones and hot-spot sizes for assessing proliferative index and grading in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours using manual and image analysis.
比较不同抗 Ki67 抗体克隆和热点大小,用于使用手动和图像分析评估胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的增殖指数和分级。
Histopathology. 2020 Oct;77(4):646-658. doi: 10.1111/his.14200. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
Practical approaches to automated digital image analysis of Ki-67 labeling index in 997 breast carcinomas and causes of discordance with visual assessment.997 例乳腺癌中 Ki-67 标记指数自动化数字图像分析的实用方法及与视觉评估不一致的原因。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0212309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212309. eCollection 2019.
5
Clinical usefulness of the free web-based image analysis application ImmunoRatio for assessment of Ki-67 labelling index in breast cancer.基于网络的免费图像分析应用程序ImmunoRatio在评估乳腺癌Ki-67标记指数中的临床实用性。
J Clin Pathol. 2017 Aug;70(8):715-719. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204162. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
6
ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Pathology: Diagnosis and Prognostic Stratification.神经内分泌肿瘤护理标准的ENETS共识指南:病理学:诊断与预后分层
Neuroendocrinology. 2017;105(3):196-200. doi: 10.1159/000457956. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
7
Proliferation Index Evaluation in Breast Cancer Using ImageJ and ImmunoRatio Applications.使用ImageJ和ImmunoRatio应用程序评估乳腺癌中的增殖指数
Anticancer Res. 2016 Aug;36(8):3965-72.
8
Comparison of the methods for measuring the Ki-67 labeling index in adrenocortical carcinoma: manual versus digital image analysis.肾上腺皮质癌中Ki-67标记指数测量方法的比较:手动与数字图像分析
Hum Pathol. 2016 Jul;53:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.10.017. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
9
Comparison of Three Ki-67 Index Quantification Methods and Clinical Significance in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.三种Ki-67指数定量方法在胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤中的比较及临床意义
Endocr Pathol. 2015 Sep;26(3):255-62. doi: 10.1007/s12022-015-9379-2.
10
External validation of the ImmunoRatio image analysis application for ERα determination in breast cancer.乳腺癌中 ERα 测定的 ImmunoRatio 图像分析应用的外部验证。
J Clin Pathol. 2014 Jan;67(1):72-5. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201680. Epub 2013 Aug 28.