• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟及全球范围内新冠疫情的流行病学演变、经济影响以及防控策略对其的作用:一项生态学研究

Epidemiological evolution and economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the European Union and worldwide and effects of control strategies on them: An ecological study.

作者信息

Caylà J A, Bellmunt J M, Jansà J M, Marco A, Millet J P

机构信息

Tuberculosis Research Unit Foundation of Barcelona, Provença 286°-2-1ª, 08008 Barcelona, Spain.

ABS Barceloneta, Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; Pompeu Fabra University, Dr. Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; Hospital del Mar Institute for Medical Research (IMIM), Dr. Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Semergen. 2024 Sep;50(6):102274. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102274. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102274
PMID:38865758
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the epidemiological evolution and economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the European Union (EU) and worldwide, and the effects of control strategies on them.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We collected incidence, mortality, and gross domestic product (GDP) data between the first quarter of 2020 and of 2023. Then, we reviewed the effectiveness of the mitigation and zero-COVID control strategies. The statistical analysis was done calculating the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of two rates and its 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

In the EU, COVID-19 presented six epidemic waves. The sixth one at the beginning of 2022 was the biggest. Globally, the biggest wave occurred at the beginning of 2023. Highest mortality rates were observed in the EU during 2020-2021 and globally at the beginning of 2021. In mitigation countries, mortality was much higher than in zero-COVID countries (IRR=6.82 [95% CI: 6.14-7.60]; p<0.001). A GDP reduction was observed worldwide, except in Asia. None of the eight zero-COVID countries presented a GDP growth percentage lower than the EU percentage in 2020, and 3/8 in 2022 (p=0.054). COVID-19 pandemic caused epidemic waves with high mortality rates and a negative impact on GDP.

CONCLUSION

The zero-COVID strategy was more effective in avoiding mortality and potentially had a lower impact on GDP in the first pandemic year.

摘要

目的

评估新冠疫情在欧盟及全球的流行病学演变和经济影响,以及防控策略对其产生的效果。

材料与方法

我们收集了2020年第一季度至2023年的发病率、死亡率和国内生产总值(GDP)数据。然后,我们回顾了缓解策略和动态清零防控策略的有效性。通过计算两个率的发病率比(IRR)及其95%置信区间(CI)进行统计分析。

结果

在欧盟,新冠疫情出现了六波流行。2022年初的第六波是最大的一波。在全球范围内,最大的一波出现在2023年初。2020 - 2021年期间欧盟的死亡率最高,2021年初全球死亡率最高。在采取缓解策略的国家,死亡率远高于采取动态清零策略的国家(IRR = 6.82 [95% CI:6.14 - 7.60];p < 0.001)。除亚洲外,全球范围内均观察到GDP下降。八个采取动态清零策略的国家中,没有一个国家在202年的GDP增长率低于欧盟,2022年有3/8(p = 0.054)。新冠疫情引发了高死亡率的流行波,并对GDP产生了负面影响。

结论

在疫情的第一年,动态清零策略在避免死亡方面更有效,并且对GDP的潜在影响可能更低。

相似文献

1
Epidemiological evolution and economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the European Union and worldwide and effects of control strategies on them: An ecological study.欧盟及全球范围内新冠疫情的流行病学演变、经济影响以及防控策略对其的作用:一项生态学研究
Semergen. 2024 Sep;50(6):102274. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102274. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
2
Social Restrictions versus Testing Campaigns in the COVID-19 Crisis: A Predictive Model Based on the Spanish Case.社会限制与新冠危机下的检测活动:基于西班牙案例的预测模型。
Viruses. 2021 May 15;13(5):917. doi: 10.3390/v13050917.
3
Association between COVID-19 morbidity, mortality, and gross domestic product, overweight/ obesity, non-communicable diseases, vaccination rate: A cross-sectional study.新冠肺炎发病率、死亡率与国内生产总值、超重/肥胖、非传染性疾病、疫苗接种率的关系:一项横断面研究。
J Infect Public Health. 2022 Feb;15(2):255-260. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.01.009. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
4
Association of Simulated COVID-19 Policy Responses for Social Restrictions and Lockdowns With Health-Adjusted Life-Years and Costs in Victoria, Australia.模拟澳大利亚维多利亚州新冠疫情政策对社会限制和封锁措施的反应与健康调整生命年和成本的关系。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jul 30;2(7):e211749. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1749. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
A global study of screening intensity and economic status on epidemic control performance during various epidemic periods of COVID-19 mutant strains.一项关于 COVID-19 变异株不同流行期筛查强度和经济状况对疫情控制效果影响的全球研究。
Risk Anal. 2024 Jul;44(7):1605-1615. doi: 10.1111/risa.14263. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
6
Associating the Change in New COVID-19 Cases to GDP per Capita in 38 European Countries in the First Wave of the Pandemic.将大流行第一波期间 38 个欧洲国家的人均 GDP 与新增 COVID-19 病例的变化相关联。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 20;8:582140. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.582140. eCollection 2020.
7
Global age-sex-specific mortality, life expectancy, and population estimates in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1950-2021, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.204 个国家和地区及 811 个次国家级行政单位 1950 年至 2021 年的全球年龄、性别特异性死亡率、预期寿命和人口估计,以及 COVID-19 大流行的影响:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的综合人口分析。
Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):1989-2056. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00476-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
8
Measuring the Impact of Future Outbreaks? A Secondary Analysis of Routinely Available Data in Spain.衡量未来疫情的影响?西班牙常规数据的二次分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13981. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113981.
9
Impact of stringent non-pharmaceutical interventions applied during the second and third COVID-19 epidemic waves in Portugal, 9 November 2020 to 10 February 2021: an ecological study.2020 年 11 月 9 日至 2021 年 2 月 10 日期间葡萄牙实施严格的非药物干预对第二波和第三波 COVID-19 疫情的影响:一项生态学研究。
Euro Surveill. 2022 Jun;27(23). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.23.2100497.
10
The global economic burden of COVID-19 disease: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.《COVID-19 疾病的全球经济负担:全面系统评价和荟萃分析》。
Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 16;13(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02476-6.