George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Waste Manag. 2024 Sep 15;186:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2024.05.037. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
As part of its commitment to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the U.S. annually develops a national estimate of methane emissions from municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills by aggregating activity data from each facility. Since 2010, the U.S. has reported a 20 % decrease in MSW landfill emissions despite a 21 % increase in tons disposed. Operator-submitted data were investigated to understand the causes of this decline. In the U.S., operators of landfills with a gas collection and control system (GCCS) calculate their facility's emissions via two separate approaches - (1) first-order decay (FOD) and (2) collection efficiency assumption (CEA) - and select either result to feed into the annual inventory. The FOD model predicts methane generation proportional to waste disposal and that approach calculated a 19 % increase in total methane generated from 2010 to 2022, whereas generation via the CEA approach decreased by 8.9 %. The amount of measured methane collected has increased 7.5 % for the same years. Discrepancies between the two models' generated methane, assumed gas collection efficiencies, and oxidized methane compound into substantive differences in national estimates. Operators more frequently select the CEA method, which results in decreased national estimates. If only the FOD method was used, U.S. MSW landfill emissions would be 1.3-1.7 times greater than current estimates which is similar to recent extrapolations from remote sensing campaigns in the U.S. Both models contain parameters with large inherent uncertainty. Without measurement methods that continuously quantify both point-source and diffuse emissions, an assessment of either equation's accuracy cannot be made.
作为其对联合国气候变化框架公约承诺的一部分,美国每年通过汇总每个设施的活动数据,对来自城市固体废物(MSW)垃圾填埋场的甲烷排放量进行国家估算。自 2010 年以来,尽管处置量增加了 21%,但美国报告称 MSW 垃圾填埋场的排放量下降了 20%。为了了解这种下降的原因,调查了运营商提交的数据。在美国,具有气体收集和控制系统(GCCS)的垃圾填埋场的运营商通过两种单独的方法来计算其设施的排放量 - (1)一阶衰减(FOD)和(2)收集效率假设(CEA) - 并选择任一结果来输入年度清单。FOD 模型预测甲烷的生成与废物处置成比例,该方法计算得出 2010 年至 2022 年期间总甲烷生成量增加了 19%,而通过 CEA 方法生成的甲烷减少了 8.9%。同期测量的甲烷收集量增加了 7.5%。两种模型生成的甲烷、假设的气体收集效率以及氧化的甲烷化合物之间的差异导致国家估算值存在实质性差异。运营商更频繁地选择 CEA 方法,这导致国家估算值下降。如果仅使用 FOD 方法,美国 MSW 垃圾填埋场的排放量将比当前估计值高出 1.3-1.7 倍,这与美国遥感活动的最近外推值相似。这两种模型都包含固有不确定性很大的参数。在没有连续量化点源和扩散排放的测量方法的情况下,无法评估任何一个方程的准确性。