Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
J Neurosci. 2024 Jul 24;44(30):e0195242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0195-24.2024.
Representing the probability and uncertainty of outcomes facilitates adaptive behavior by allowing organisms to prepare in advance and devote attention to relevant events. Probability and uncertainty are often studied only for valenced (appetitive or aversive) outcomes, raising the question of whether the identified neural machinery also processes the probability and uncertainty of motivationally neutral outcomes. Here, we aimed to dissociate valenced from valence-independent (i.e., generic) probability (; maximum at = 1) and uncertainty (maximum at = 0.5) signals using human neuroimaging. In a Pavlovian task ( = 41; 19 females), different cues predicted appetitive, aversive, or neutral liquids with different probabilities ( = 0, = 0.5, = 1). Cue-elicited motor responses accelerated, and pupil sizes increased primarily for cues that predicted valenced liquids with higher probability. For neutral liquids, uncertainty rather than probability tended to accelerate cue-induced responding and decrease pupil size. At the neural level, generic uncertainty signals were limited to the occipital cortex, while generic probability also activated the anterior ventromedial prefrontal cortex. These generic probability and uncertainty signals contrasted with cue-induced responses that only encoded the probability and uncertainty of valenced liquids in medial prefrontal, insular, and occipital cortices. Our findings show a behavioral and neural dissociation of generic and valenced signals. Thus, some parts of the brain keep track of motivational charge while others do not, highlighting the need and usefulness of characterizing the exact nature of learned representations.
代表结果的概率和不确定性通过允许生物体提前准备并关注相关事件来促进适应性行为。概率和不确定性通常仅针对有价值的(有吸引力或厌恶)结果进行研究,这就提出了一个问题,即所确定的神经机制是否也处理动机中性结果的概率和不确定性。在这里,我们旨在使用人类神经影像学技术将有价值的结果与独立于价值的(即通用)概率(最大值为 1)和不确定性(最大值为 0.5)信号区分开来。在一个条件反射任务中(n=41;女性 19 名),不同的线索以不同的概率(n=0,n=0.5,n=1)预测有吸引力、厌恶或中性的液体。线索引发的运动反应主要针对预测有较高概率的有价值液体的线索而加速,瞳孔大小也随之增加。对于中性液体,不确定性而不是概率往往会加速线索引发的反应并减小瞳孔大小。在神经水平上,通用不确定性信号仅限于枕叶皮层,而通用概率也激活了前腹内侧前额叶皮层。这些通用的概率和不确定性信号与仅在中前额叶、岛叶和枕叶皮层中编码有价值液体的概率和不确定性的线索诱导反应形成对比。我们的研究结果表明,通用信号和有价值信号在行为和神经上存在分离。因此,大脑的某些部分会跟踪动机电荷,而其他部分则不会,这突出了描述学习表示的确切性质的必要性和有用性。