• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

UMP 和 RIRS 在 1.0-2.0cm 直径肾脏/上段输尿管结石中的临床研究。

Clinical study of UMP and RIRS in 1.0-2.0 cm diameter renal/upper ureteral calculi.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.

Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2024 Jun 13;42(1):376. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05076-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-05076-0
PMID:38869843
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP) and Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal/upper ureteral calculi in 1.0-2.0 cm diameter.

METHODS

From October 2017 to October 2022, the surgical treatment of patients with renal/upper ureteral calculi in 1.0-2.0 cm diameter who were admitted to our hospital was retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups, the UMP group (sixty-two cases) and the RIRS group (one hundred and nine cases), according to the different surgical methods. Baseline data includes general information, stone size, location, CT value, hydronephrosis, creatinine level, etc. RESULTS: Intraoperative blood loss was 33.6 ± 8.5 ml in the UMP group was significantly more than 4.3 ± 0.7 ml in the RIRS group (P < 0.05). Intraoperative renal pelvis pressure of UMP group 10.5 ± 1.3 mmHg was significantly lower than RIRS group 23.6 ± 5.6 mmHg (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative infection was higher in the RIRS group (thirteen cases [11.93%]), and one case ([1.61%]) in the UMP group (P < 0.05). Routine CT scans on the second day and two months after surgery showed that the stone clearance rates in the UMP group were 87.1% and 93.5%, respectively, higher than those in the RIRS group (69.7% and 79.8%, respectively; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

UMP has the advantage of a higher stone-free rate but a higher risk of injury and bleeding. The advantages of RIRS include less trauma, less bleeding, and faster recovery, but lower stone-free rates and a higher risk of infection.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较超微经皮肾镜碎石术(UMP)和逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)治疗 1.0-2.0cm 直径肾结石/上段输尿管结石的疗效和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析 2017 年 10 月至 2022 年 10 月我院收治的 1.0-2.0cm 直径肾结石/上段输尿管结石患者的手术治疗资料,根据手术方式的不同分为 UMP 组(62 例)和 RIRS 组(109 例)。收集患者的一般资料、结石大小、位置、CT 值、肾积水程度、血肌酐水平等基线资料。

结果

UMP 组术中出血量为 33.6±8.5ml,明显多于 RIRS 组的 4.3±0.7ml(P<0.05)。UMP 组肾盂内压力为 10.5±1.3mmHg,明显低于 RIRS 组的 23.6±5.6mmHg(P<0.05)。RIRS 组术后感染发生率较高(13 例,11.93%),UMP 组仅 1 例(1.61%)(P<0.05)。术后第 2 天和 2 个月常规 CT 扫描显示,UMP 组结石清除率分别为 87.1%和 93.5%,高于 RIRS 组的 69.7%和 79.8%(P<0.05)。

结论

UMP 结石清除率较高,但损伤和出血风险较高。RIRS 的优点是创伤小、出血少、恢复快,但结石清除率较低,感染风险较高。

相似文献

1
Clinical study of UMP and RIRS in 1.0-2.0 cm diameter renal/upper ureteral calculi.UMP 和 RIRS 在 1.0-2.0cm 直径肾脏/上段输尿管结石中的临床研究。
World J Urol. 2024 Jun 13;42(1):376. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05076-0.
2
Comparative analysis of retrograde intrarenal surgery and modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower pole renal stones (1.5-3.5 cm).逆行性肾内手术与改良超微经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极肾结石(1.5-3.5cm)的对比分析。
BMC Urol. 2020 Mar 16;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00586-6.
3
Ultramini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of 10-30 mm calculi: a randomized controlled trial.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗 10-30mm 结石:一项随机对照试验。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Jun;50(3):361-367. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01304-7. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
4
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy and safety of antegrade minimally percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of upper ureteral impacted stones: a retrospective cohort study.顺行微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗输尿管上段嵌顿结石的疗效及安全性比较评估:一项回顾性队列研究
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Mar 28;97(1):13336. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.13336.
5
Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Patients with Kidney Stones and Their Impact on Inflammatory Response and Renal Function.输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗肾结石的疗效及其对患者炎症反应和肾功能的影响。
Ann Ital Chir. 2024;95(2):220-226. doi: 10.62713/aic.3175.
6
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
7
Clinical efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1-2.5 cm) in children ≤10 years of age.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行肾内手术治疗 10 岁以下儿童 1-2.5cm 上尿路结石的临床疗效比较。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):605.e1-605.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.019. Epub 2024 May 25.
8
Comparison of super-mini-PCNL and flexible ureteroscopy for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1-2 cm) in children.比较超微经皮肾镜碎石术与输尿管软镜治疗儿童上尿路结石(1-2cm)。
World J Urol. 2021 Jan;39(1):195-200. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03150-x. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
9
Comparative Analysis of Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Management of Renal Calculi ≤2 cm Among Somali Population.索马里人群肾结石≤2cm 经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗的对比分析。
J Endourol. 2024 May;38(5):426-431. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0675. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
10
A prospective randomized comparison of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones.微创经皮肾镜取石术(Microperc)与逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)治疗下极肾结石的前瞻性随机对照比较。
World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1771-1776. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2058-9. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Letter to the editor for the article "Clinical study of UMP and RIRS in 1.0-2.0 cm diameter renal/upper ureteral calculi".致编辑的信:关于“直径1.0 - 2.0厘米肾/上段输尿管结石的输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术与逆行肾盂造影术的临床研究”一文
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 20;43(1):183. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05542-3.
2
Letter to the editor for the article "Patients undergoing double J substitution with a pigtail suture stent report a significant decrease of stent‑related symptoms. Results from a prospective multicenter longitudinal trial".致编辑的信:关于文章《采用猪尾缝合支架进行双J管置换的患者报告支架相关症状显著减少。一项前瞻性多中心纵向试验的结果》
World J Urol. 2024 Sep 6;42(1):505. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05215-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences between Risk Factors for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Obstructive Urolithiasis.梗阻性尿路结石患者发生脓毒症和感染性休克的危险因素差异。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Nov 9;35(43):e359. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e359.
2
Experience of a Tertiary-Level Urology Center in Clinical Urological Events of Rare and Very Rare Incidence. V. Urological Tumors: 1. Adrenal Myelolipoma.三级泌尿外科中心处理罕见和极罕见临床泌尿事件的经验。五、泌尿肿瘤:1. 肾上腺髓样脂肪瘤。
Curr Urol. 2020 Jun;14(2):85-91. doi: 10.1159/000499254. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
3
Effects on renal outcome of concomitant acute pyelonephritis, acute kidney injury and obstruction duration in obstructive uropathy by urolithiasis: a retrospective cohort study.
尿路结石所致梗阻性肾病中,急性肾盂肾炎、急性肾损伤及梗阻持续时间对肾脏预后的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 3;9(11):e030438. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030438.
4
Performance of Quick Sequential (Sepsis Related) and Sequential (Sepsis Related) Organ Failure Assessment to Predict Mortality in Patients with Acute Pyelonephritis Associated with Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.快速序贯器官衰竭评估(Sepsis 相关)和序贯器官衰竭评估(Sepsis 相关)预测伴有上尿路结石的急性肾盂肾炎患者死亡率的性能。
J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1526-1533. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.052. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
5
Epidemiology of stone disease across the world.全球结石病的流行病学。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1301-1320. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
6
Characterization of Urolithiasis in Patients Following Lower Urinary Tract Reconstruction with Intestinal Segments.下尿路肠道段重建术后患者尿路结石的特征分析
J Endourol. 2017 Mar;31(3):217-222. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0297. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
7
A fatal mycotic sepsis after retrograde intrarenal surgery: a case report and literature review.逆行性肾内手术后的致命性真菌败血症:一例报告及文献综述
Urologia. 2017 Apr 28;84(2):106-108. doi: 10.5301/uro.5000173. Epub 2016 May 6.
8
Clinical significance of residual fragments in 2015: impact, detection, and how to avoid them.2015年残留碎片的临床意义:影响、检测及如何避免残留碎片
World J Urol. 2016 Jun;34(6):771-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1713-2. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
9
Minimally invasive surgical treatment for kidney stone disease.肾结石疾病的微创手术治疗
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015 Jul;22(4):266-72. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.03.005.
10
Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP): one more armamentarium.超微经皮肾镜碎石术(UMP):又一种武器。
BJU Int. 2013 Nov;112(7):1046-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12193. Epub 2013 Jul 11.