• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸椎旁神经阻滞对经皮肾镜取石术后的镇痛效果:一项回顾性研究。

The Analgesic Effects of the Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Post-percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Js Medeiros Heitor, Gee Erica, Pak Aimee, Hu Vivian, Crawford Lane, Razavi Sarah, Anderson T Anthony, Sabouri A Sassan

机构信息

Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

Anesthesiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 May 14;16(5):e60272. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60272. eCollection 2024 May.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.60272
PMID:38872686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11170241/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive procedure for treating large and complex kidney stones, often resulting in significant post-operative pain and increased opioid use. This study aims to compare pain scores between patients undergoing PCNL who did and did not receive a preoperative single-shot thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) usage on post-operative day 1 (POD 1), total opioid consumption on PACU and POD 1, and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on the medical records of 341 patients who underwent PCNL from July 2014 to April 2016 in a single major academic center. PVB was administered at thoracic levels T7-9 using a volume of 20 cc of bupivacaine, ranging from 0.25% to 0.5%, to achieve the desired analgesic effect.

RESULTS

After excluding 34 patients, the study included 123 in the no block (NB) group and 149 in the regional anesthesia (RA) group. There were no differences in demographics, including age, sex, weight and height, BMI, and indication for PCNL. The results revealed that the RA group experienced a statistically significant reduction in PCA usage in both crude and adjusted models (adjusted logistic regression analysis: OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.05-0.60; p = 0.008). However, there were no significant changes in total opioid consumption, pain scores, or incidents of PONV.

CONCLUSION

The retrospective analysis did not reveal any discernible advantage in pain management associated with the use of PVB for post-PCNL analgesia, except for reducing the percentage of PCA narcotics used. Future investigations with larger sample sizes and meticulous control for surgical indications and complexity are imperative to accurately assess the efficacy of this block in the context of post-PCNL surgery.

摘要

引言

经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是一种用于治疗大的和复杂肾结石的微创手术,术后常导致明显疼痛并增加阿片类药物的使用。本研究旨在比较在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)接受和未接受术前单次胸段椎旁阻滞(PVB)的PCNL患者的疼痛评分作为主要结局。次要结局包括术后第1天(POD 1)的患者自控镇痛(PCA)使用情况、PACU和POD 1的总阿片类药物消耗量以及术后恶心呕吐(PONV)。

方法

对2014年7月至2016年4月在一个主要学术中心接受PCNL的341例患者的病历进行回顾性队列研究。使用20 cc布比卡因(浓度范围为0.25%至0.5%)在胸段T7 - 9水平进行PVB,以达到所需的镇痛效果。

结果

排除34例患者后,研究纳入了123例非阻滞(NB)组患者和149例区域麻醉(RA)组患者。在人口统计学特征方面,包括年龄、性别、体重和身高、BMI以及PCNL的适应证,两组之间没有差异。结果显示,在粗模型和校正模型中,RA组的PCA使用量均有统计学意义的显著减少(校正逻辑回归分析:OR = 0.19,95% CI = 0.05 - 0.60;p = 0.008)。然而,总阿片类药物消耗量、疼痛评分或PONV发生率没有显著变化。

结论

回顾性分析未发现与PCNL术后使用PVB进行疼痛管理相关的任何明显优势,除了降低PCA麻醉剂的使用百分比。未来需要进行更大样本量的研究,并对手术适应证和复杂性进行细致控制,以准确评估该阻滞在PCNL术后的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c918/11170241/4728d3d134e0/cureus-0016-00000060272-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c918/11170241/0c8a45c74b5b/cureus-0016-00000060272-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c918/11170241/2e503b01f071/cureus-0016-00000060272-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c918/11170241/4728d3d134e0/cureus-0016-00000060272-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c918/11170241/0c8a45c74b5b/cureus-0016-00000060272-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c918/11170241/2e503b01f071/cureus-0016-00000060272-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c918/11170241/4728d3d134e0/cureus-0016-00000060272-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
The Analgesic Effects of the Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Post-percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy: A Retrospective Study.胸椎旁神经阻滞对经皮肾镜取石术后的镇痛效果:一项回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2024 May 14;16(5):e60272. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60272. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Postoperative analgesic effects of paravertebral block versus erector spinae plane block for thoracic and breast surgery: A meta-analysis.胸椎和乳腺手术后椎旁阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞的术后镇痛效果:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0256611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256611. eCollection 2021.
3
The efficacy and safety of paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in renal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.椎旁阻滞用于肾脏手术术后镇痛的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 18;9:865362. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.865362. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparative study of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block versus intravenous tramadol for postoperative pain control in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.超声引导下椎旁阻滞与静脉注射曲马多用于经皮肾镜取石术后疼痛控制的比较研究
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0479-7.
5
Paravertebral blocks in breast cancer surgery: is there a difference in postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting?乳腺癌手术的椎旁阻滞:术后疼痛、恶心和呕吐有区别吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb;19(2):548-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1899-5. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
6
Impact of paravertebral blocks on analgesic and non-analgesic outcomes after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A propensity matched cohort study.椎旁阻滞对电视辅助胸腔镜手术后镇痛和非镇痛效果的影响:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 20;16(5):e0252059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252059. eCollection 2021.
7
Assessment of Intercostal Nerve Block Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估肋间神经阻滞镇痛在胸外科手术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133394. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33394.
8
Paravertebral block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study.经皮肾镜取石术的椎旁阻滞:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲安慰剂对照研究。
World J Urol. 2020 Nov;38(11):2963-2969. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03093-3. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
9
Usage of Multilevel Paravertebral Block as the Main Anesthesia for Mini-Invasive PCNL: Retrospective Review of 45 Cases with Large Stones.多节段椎旁阻滞作为微创经皮肾镜取石术主要麻醉方式的应用:45例大结石病例的回顾性分析
Urol Int. 2017;99(3):326-330. doi: 10.1159/000480094. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
10
Comparison of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block versus erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after percutaneous nephrolithotomy - A randomised, double-blind, controlled study.超声引导下椎旁阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞用于经皮肾镜取石术后镇痛的比较——一项随机、双盲、对照研究
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Dec;67(12):1110-1115. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_355_23. Epub 2023 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Erector spinae plane blocks for analgesia after percutaneous nephrolithotomy A pathway to reduce opioids.经皮肾镜取石术后竖脊肌平面阻滞用于镇痛:减少阿片类药物使用的途径
Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Oct;17(10):E330-E335. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8323.
2
Methodology for clinical research.临床研究方法。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2022 Oct 17;63(2 Suppl 3):E267-E278. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.2S3.2769. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided paravertebral block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients: a randomized controlled clinical study.
超声引导椎旁神经阻滞在经皮肾镜取石术患者中的镇痛效果:一项随机对照临床研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01169-6.
4
Post Hoc Power: Not Empowering, Just Misleading.事后检验功效:并无助益,只是误导。
J Surg Res. 2021 Mar;259:A3-A6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.049. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
5
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum Diameter.系统评价和荟萃分析比较经皮肾镜取石术、逆行性肾内手术和体外冲击波碎石术治疗最大直径小于 2 cm 的下极肾结石。
J Urol. 2020 Sep;204(3):427-433. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001013. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
6
Paravertebral block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study.经皮肾镜取石术的椎旁阻滞:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲安慰剂对照研究。
World J Urol. 2020 Nov;38(11):2963-2969. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03093-3. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
7
The analgesic efficacy of paravertebral block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.经皮肾镜取石术椎旁阻滞的镇痛效果:一项随机对照研究的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(48):e17967. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017967.
8
Ultrasound-guided low thoracic paravertebral block versus peritubal infiltration for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized study.超声引导下胸腰椎旁阻滞与经皮肾镜取石术围手术期输卵管周围浸润麻醉的前瞻性随机研究。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Jun;48(3):235-244. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-01106-w. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
9
Present indications and techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: What the future holds?经皮肾镜取石术的当前适应证与技术:未来发展如何?
Asian J Urol. 2018 Oct;5(4):287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
10
The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure?疼痛强度测量的有效性:数字评定量表(NRS)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、语言评定量表(VRS)和面部表情疼痛量表修订版(FPS-R)测量的是什么?
Scand J Pain. 2018 Jan 26;18(1):99-107. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0012.