• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

豌豆多样化群体的遗传多样性和群体结构分析

Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of a diverse panel of pea ().

作者信息

Brhane Haftom, Hammenhag Cecilia

机构信息

Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2024 May 30;15:1396888. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1396888. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fgene.2024.1396888
PMID:38873115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11169732/
Abstract

Breeding resilient cultivars with increased tolerance to environmental stress and enhanced resistance to pests and diseases demands pre-breeding efforts that include understanding genetic diversity. This study aimed to evaluate the genetic diversity and population structure of 265 pea accessions. The diversity arrays technology (DArT) genotyping method was employed to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and silico markers. After stringent filtering, 6966 SNP and 8,454 silico markers were selected for diversity analysis. Genetic diversity was estimated by grouping accessions based on plant material type, geographic origin, growth habit, and seed color. Generally, diversity estimations obtained using SNPs were similar to those estimated using silico markers. The polymorphism information content (PIC) of the SNP markers ranged from 0.0 to 0.5, with a quarter of them displaying PIC values exceeding 0.4, making them highly informative. Analysis based on plant material type revealed narrow observed heterozygosity (Ho = 0.02-0.03) and expected heterozygosity (He = 0.26-0.31), with landrace accessions exhibiting the highest diversity. Geographic origin-based diversity analysis revealed Ho = 0.02-0.03 and He = 0.22 to 0.30, with European accessions showing the greatest diversity. Moreover, private alleles unique to landrace (4) and European (22) accessions were also identified, which merit further investigation for their potential association with desirable traits. The analysis of molecular variance revealed a highly significant genetic differentiation among accession groups classified by seed color, growth habit, plant material types, and geographic origin ( < 0.01). Principal coordinate analysis and neighbor-joining cluster analysis revealed weak clustering of accessions at different grouping levels. This study underscores the significance of genetic diversity in pea collections, offering valuable insights for targeted breeding and conservation efforts. By leveraging genomic data and exploring untapped genetic resources, pea breeding programs can be fortified to ensure sustainable plant protein production and address future challenges in agriculture.

摘要

培育对环境胁迫具有更高耐受性且对病虫害具有更强抗性的适应性强的品种,需要开展包括了解遗传多样性在内的预育种工作。本研究旨在评估265份豌豆种质的遗传多样性和群体结构。采用多样性阵列技术(DArT)基因分型方法来鉴定单核苷酸多态性(SNP)和电子标记。经过严格筛选,选择了6966个SNP和8454个电子标记用于多样性分析。基于植物材料类型、地理起源、生长习性和种子颜色对种质进行分组,从而估计遗传多样性。一般来说,使用SNP获得的多样性估计值与使用电子标记估计的结果相似。SNP标记的多态性信息含量(PIC)范围为0.0至0.5,其中四分之一显示PIC值超过0.4,使其具有高度信息性。基于植物材料类型的分析显示观察到的杂合度(Ho = 0.02 - 0.03)和预期杂合度(He = 0.26 - 0.31)较窄,但地方品种种质表现出最高的多样性。基于地理起源的多样性分析显示Ho = 0.02 - 0.03,He = 0.22至0.30,欧洲种质表现出最大的多样性。此外,还鉴定了地方品种(4个)和欧洲(22个)种质特有的私有等位基因,它们与优良性状的潜在关联值得进一步研究。分子方差分析显示,按种子颜色、生长习性、植物材料类型和地理起源分类的种质组之间存在高度显著的遗传分化(<0.01)。主坐标分析和邻接法聚类分析显示,在不同分组水平上种质的聚类较弱。本研究强调了豌豆种质中遗传多样性的重要性,为有针对性的育种和保护工作提供了有价值的见解。通过利用基因组数据和探索未开发的遗传资源,可以加强豌豆育种计划,以确保可持续的植物蛋白生产并应对未来农业面临的挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/6e89daa656b7/fgene-15-1396888-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/171ac1fd070e/fgene-15-1396888-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/6a46a3c1dbd7/fgene-15-1396888-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/95062106a0ac/fgene-15-1396888-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/af9e568fee4b/fgene-15-1396888-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/40d8c523be57/fgene-15-1396888-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/1fc0098ba653/fgene-15-1396888-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/7703a67d9355/fgene-15-1396888-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/2f020ce9cbdd/fgene-15-1396888-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/b4a9ae771e2d/fgene-15-1396888-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/8eaff51f33a0/fgene-15-1396888-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/4167a74c1354/fgene-15-1396888-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/b2da93243694/fgene-15-1396888-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/6e89daa656b7/fgene-15-1396888-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/171ac1fd070e/fgene-15-1396888-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/6a46a3c1dbd7/fgene-15-1396888-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/95062106a0ac/fgene-15-1396888-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/af9e568fee4b/fgene-15-1396888-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/40d8c523be57/fgene-15-1396888-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/1fc0098ba653/fgene-15-1396888-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/7703a67d9355/fgene-15-1396888-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/2f020ce9cbdd/fgene-15-1396888-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/b4a9ae771e2d/fgene-15-1396888-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/8eaff51f33a0/fgene-15-1396888-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/4167a74c1354/fgene-15-1396888-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/b2da93243694/fgene-15-1396888-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add4/11169732/6e89daa656b7/fgene-15-1396888-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of a diverse panel of pea ().豌豆多样化群体的遗传多样性和群体结构分析
Front Genet. 2024 May 30;15:1396888. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1396888. eCollection 2024.
2
Novel GBS-Based SNP Markers for Finger Millet and Their Use in Genetic Diversity Analyses.基于谷子条纹病毒的新型单核苷酸多态性标记及其在遗传多样性分析中的应用
Front Genet. 2022 Apr 26;13:848627. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.848627. eCollection 2022.
3
Assessment of genetic diversity in Ethiopian field pea (Pisum sativum L.) accessions with newly developed EST-SSR markers.利用新开发的EST-SSR标记评估埃塞俄比亚豌豆(Pisum sativum L.)种质的遗传多样性。
BMC Genet. 2015 Aug 19;16:102. doi: 10.1186/s12863-015-0261-5.
4
In-depth genome diversity, population structure and linkage disequilibrium analysis of worldwide diverse safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) accessions using NGS data generated by DArTseq technology.利用 DArTseq 技术生成的 NGS 数据对全球不同的红花(Carthamus tinctorius L.)资源进行深入的基因组多样性、群体结构和连锁不平衡分析。
Mol Biol Rep. 2020 Mar;47(3):2123-2135. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05312-x. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
5
Genome-wide characterization of genetic diversity and population structure in Secale.黑麦基因组遗传多样性和群体结构的全基因组特征分析。
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Aug 1;14:184. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-184.
6
Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Sorghum [ (L.) Moench] Accessions as Revealed by Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Markers.单核苷酸多态性标记揭示的高粱[(L.)Moench]种质资源的遗传多样性和群体结构
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jan 5;12:799482. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.799482. eCollection 2021.
7
Assessment of the Genetic Structure and Diversity of Soybean (&nbsp; L.) Germplasm Using Diversity Array Technology and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Markers.利用多样性阵列技术和单核苷酸多态性标记评估大豆(Glycine max (L.))种质的遗传结构与多样性
Plants (Basel). 2021 Dec 26;11(1):68. doi: 10.3390/plants11010068.
8
Novel Expressed Sequence Tag-Derived and Other Genomic Simple Sequence Repeat Markers Revealed Genetic Diversity in Ethiopian Finger Millet Landrace Populations and Cultivars.新型表达序列标签衍生及其他基因组简单序列重复标记揭示了埃塞俄比亚龙爪稷地方品种群体和栽培品种的遗传多样性。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Sep 23;12:735610. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.735610. eCollection 2021.
9
Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of a Wide spp. Core Collection.广泛的 spp.核心收集的遗传多样性和种群结构。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 27;24(3):2470. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032470.
10
Genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel.豌豆多样性群体中的遗传多样性与性状基因组预测
BMC Genomics. 2015 Feb 21;16(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1266-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Data on the nutritional and fatty acid composition, bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity and techno-functional properties of a collection of pea ( L.).一批豌豆(L.)的营养和脂肪酸组成、生物活性化合物、抗氧化活性及技术功能特性的数据。
Data Brief. 2025 Jun 2;61:111709. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111709. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Exploring Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Australian Passion Fruit Germplasm.探索澳大利亚百香果种质的遗传多样性和群体结构。
BioTech (Basel). 2025 May 16;14(2):37. doi: 10.3390/biotech14020037.
3
Low genetic diversity and weak population structure of Albizia odoratissima on Hainan Island.

本文引用的文献

1
Cookability of 24 pea accessions-determining factors and potential predictors of cooking quality.24 个豌豆品种的可烹饪性——烹饪质量的决定因素和潜在预测因子。
J Sci Food Agric. 2024 Apr;104(6):3685-3696. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.13253. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
2
Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of a Wide spp. Core Collection.广泛的 spp.核心收集的遗传多样性和种群结构。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 27;24(3):2470. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032470.
3
Improved pea reference genome and pan-genome highlight genomic features and evolutionary characteristics.
海南岛香合欢的低遗传多样性和弱种群结构
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06373-5.
4
Genomic prediction for rust resistance in pea.豌豆抗锈病的基因组预测
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jul 23;15:1429802. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1429802. eCollection 2024.
改良的豌豆参考基因组和泛基因组突出了基因组特征和进化特征。
Nat Genet. 2022 Oct;54(10):1553-1563. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01172-2. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
4
Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization and Correlation Analysis of Pea ( L.) Diversity Panel.豌豆(L.)多样性群体的表型和基因型特征及相关性分析
Plants (Basel). 2022 May 16;11(10):1321. doi: 10.3390/plants11101321.
5
Unraveling the Genetic Basis of Key Agronomic Traits of Wrinkled Vining Pea ( L.) for Sustainable Production.解析皱皮蔓生豌豆(L.)关键农艺性状的遗传基础以实现可持续生产
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 14;13:844450. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.844450. eCollection 2022.
6
Importance of Landraces in Cereal Breeding for Stress Tolerance.地方品种在谷类作物抗逆育种中的重要性。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;10(7):1267. doi: 10.3390/plants10071267.
7
Genome-Wide DArTSeq Genotyping and Phenotypic Based Assessment of Within and Among Accessions Diversity and Effective Sample Size in the Diverse Sorghum, Pearl Millet, and Pigeonpea Landraces.基于全基因组DArTSeq基因分型和表型的不同高粱、珍珠粟和木豆地方品种内及品种间多样性与有效样本量评估
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 14;11:587426. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.587426. eCollection 2020.
8
Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling resistance to pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum) in a high-density integrated DArTseq SNP-based genetic map of pea.鉴定豌豆象(Bruchus pisorum)抗性的数量性状位点(QTL)在豌豆高密度集成 DArTseq SNP 遗传图谱中的分布。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 8;10(1):33. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56987-7.
9
Genome-Wide Association Mapping for Agronomic and Seed Quality Traits of Field Pea ( L.).豌豆(L.)农艺和种子品质性状的全基因组关联图谱分析
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 26;10:1538. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01538. eCollection 2019.
10
Variation in Pea ( L.) Seed Quality Traits Defined by Physicochemical Functional Properties.由物理化学功能特性定义的豌豆(L.)种子品质性状的变异
Foods. 2019 Nov 13;8(11):570. doi: 10.3390/foods8110570.