Smuda Sayed Saad, Mohammed Amera T, Tsakali Efstathia, Van Impe Jan F M, Marie Asmaa M
Food Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture Cairo University Giza Egypt.
Department of Crops Technology Research Food Technology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center Giza Egypt.
Food Sci Nutr. 2024 Apr 12;12(6):4299-4310. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4095. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Spread products have an important market share as they have high nutritional value and they are increasingly consumed, especially by children as a source of energy. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the potential use of powdered chickpea, black rice, carob, doum, date seeds, and beetroot to produce novel functional spreadable products as cocoa-free alternatives. Additionally, to avoid the side effects of cocoa-based products and to assess the cocoa replacement effects on the sensory properties, chemical composition, texture analysis, viscosity, antioxidant, peroxide stability, and microbial quality during storage periods were compared to the ones of cocoa spread. Sensory evaluation revealed that most formulated spreads were accepted as chocolate spread alternatives since there was no significant difference in overall acceptability among cocoa, chickpea, black rice, carob, and doum, while date seeds and beetroot spreads were significantly less acceptable. A variation was observed in the proximate chemical analysis of the produced functional spreads, as the alternative spreads had different characteristics to each other in their physicochemical, texture, and rheological properties. Results indicated a wide variation in the total phenolic content (TPC) of the different spread extracts. The highest amount of TPC was obtained for beetroot spread (455.84 mg GAE/100 g) followed by black rice spread (436.08 mg GAE/100 g). The obtained results indicated that the antioxidant activity of different spreads was significantly different ( < .05) while based on their microbiological analysis, they could have a shelf life of up to 9 months. According to the results, chickpea, carob, doum, black rice, date seeds, and beetroot powders could be used for the production of cocoa-free alternatives as they were highly acceptable and they showed antioxidant and antimicrobial activity.
涂抹酱类产品具有重要的市场份额,因为它们具有很高的营养价值,并且消费量日益增加,尤其是儿童将其作为能量来源。这项工作的目的是评估鹰嘴豆粉、黑米、角豆、杜姆豆、椰枣籽和甜菜根用于生产新型功能性涂抹产品作为无可可替代品的潜在用途。此外,为了避免可可基产品的副作用,并评估可可替代对感官特性、化学成分、质地分析、粘度、抗氧化剂、过氧化物稳定性以及储存期间微生物质量的影响,将其与可可涂抹酱进行了比较。感官评价表明,大多数配方涂抹酱被认为是巧克力涂抹酱的替代品,因为可可、鹰嘴豆、黑米、角豆和杜姆豆的总体可接受性没有显著差异,而椰枣籽和甜菜根涂抹酱的可接受性明显较低。在所生产的功能性涂抹酱的近似化学分析中观察到了差异,因为替代涂抹酱在其物理化学、质地和流变学特性方面彼此具有不同的特征。结果表明,不同涂抹酱提取物的总酚含量(TPC)差异很大。甜菜根涂抹酱的TPC含量最高(455.84毫克没食子酸当量/100克),其次是黑米涂抹酱(436.08毫克没食子酸当量/100克)。所得结果表明,不同涂抹酱的抗氧化活性存在显著差异(P<0.05),而基于微生物分析,它们的保质期可达9个月。根据结果,鹰嘴豆、角豆、杜姆豆、黑米、椰枣籽和甜菜根粉可用于生产无可可替代品,因为它们具有很高的可接受性,并且具有抗氧化和抗菌活性。