Suppr超能文献

瘢痕性质对治疗效果的影响:系统评价。

Effect of Keloid Properties on Treatment Efficacy: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (AUMC), Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2024 Oct 1;50(10):913-921. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000004256. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of keloid treatment in randomized studies is highly variable. However, no systematic review has been performed to evaluate the effect of different keloid properties on treatment efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinically relevant keloid properties that may influence treatment efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic database search was conducted. Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and performed a methodologic quality assessment using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred twenty studies were screened, and 16 RCTs, involving 1,113 patients, were included. The authors found lower efficacy in older keloids ( n = 3), keloids located on the chest, extremities, pinna, and shoulder ( n = 3), larger keloids ( n = 2), lower baseline Vancouver Scar Scale score ( n = 1), and keloids with history of recurrence ( n = 1). Overall, most studies had a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Only a minority of studies specifically addressed keloid properties, which makes comparisons between studies challenging. The authors' results suggest that keloid location, duration prior to treatment, size, history of recurrence, and severity are clinically relevant keloid properties that affect treatment efficacy. Further studies are crucial to corroborate the authors' findings, establish a clinically relevant keloid classification, and ultimately develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm that takes these properties into account.

摘要

背景

随机研究中瘢痕疙瘩治疗的疗效差异很大。然而,尚未进行系统评价来评估不同瘢痕疙瘩特征对治疗效果的影响。

目的

确定可能影响治疗效果的有临床意义的瘢痕疙瘩特征。

材料和方法

进行电子数据库检索。两位审阅者独立选择随机对照试验(RCT),并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险 2.0 工具进行方法学质量评估。

结果

筛选出 1520 篇研究,纳入了 16 项 RCT,涉及 1113 例患者。作者发现年龄较大的瘢痕疙瘩(n=3)、位于胸部、四肢、耳廓和肩部的瘢痕疙瘩(n=3)、较大的瘢痕疙瘩(n=2)、较低的温哥华瘢痕量表基线评分(n=1)和有复发史的瘢痕疙瘩(n=1)的疗效较低。总体而言,大多数研究存在较高的偏倚风险。

结论

只有少数研究专门针对瘢痕疙瘩特征,这使得研究之间的比较具有挑战性。作者的结果表明,瘢痕疙瘩的位置、治疗前的持续时间、大小、复发史和严重程度是影响治疗效果的有临床意义的瘢痕疙瘩特征。进一步的研究对于证实作者的发现、建立有临床意义的瘢痕疙瘩分类以及最终制定考虑这些特征的循证治疗方案至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a15/11424054/01d2293c3404/ds-50-913-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验