Dental Research Division, School of Dentistry, Paulista University, Av. Dr. Bacelar, 1212, 4° andar, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, 04026-002, SP, Brazil.
Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Areião, Piracicaba, 13414-903, SP, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 14;28(7):373. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05763-7.
This study evaluated the impact of the partial exposition of the nonabsorbable membrane (dPTFE) on microbial colonization during bone healing.
Patients indicated for tooth extraction were randomized to dPTFE group (n = 22) - tooth extraction and alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) using an intentionally exposed dPTFE membrane and USH group (n = 22) - tooth extraction and unassisted socket healing. Biofilm samples were collected at the barrier in the dPTFE and on the natural healing site in the USH after 3 and 28 days. Samples from the inner surface of the dPTFE barrier were also collected (n = 13). The microbiome was evaluated using the Illumina MiSeq system.
Beta diversity was different from 3 to 28 days in both groups, and at 28 days, different microbial communities were identified between therapies. The dPTFE was characterized by a higher prevalence and abundance of gram-negative and anaerobic species than USH. Furthermore, the inner surface of the dPTFE membrane was colonized by a different community than the one observed on the outer surface.
Intentionally exposed dPTFE membrane modulates microbial colonization in the ARP site, creating a more homogeneous and anaerobic community on the inner and outer surfaces of the membrane.
DPTFE promoted faster biofilm colonization and enrichment of gram-negative and anaerobes close to the regenerated site in the membrane's inner and outer surfaces. dPTFE membrane can be used exposed to the oral site, but approaches for biofilm control should still be considered. The study was retrospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04329351).
本研究评估了不吸收膜(dPTFE)部分暴露对骨愈合过程中微生物定植的影响。
将需要拔牙的患者随机分为 dPTFE 组(n=22)-使用故意暴露的 dPTFE 膜进行拔牙和牙槽嵴保存(ARP)和 USH 组(n=22)-拔牙和无辅助牙槽窝愈合。在第 3 天和第 28 天,在 dPTFE 的屏障处和 USH 的自然愈合部位采集生物膜样本。还从 dPTFE 屏障的内表面采集样本(n=13)。使用 Illumina MiSeq 系统评估微生物组。
两组在第 3 天至第 28 天之间的β多样性不同,在第 28 天,两种治疗方法之间鉴定出不同的微生物群落。dPTFE 的革兰氏阴性和厌氧菌的患病率和丰度均高于 USH。此外,dPTFE 膜的内表面比外表面上观察到的微生物群落更为多样化。
故意暴露的 dPTFE 膜调节 ARP 部位的微生物定植,在膜的内外表面形成更为均匀和厌氧的群落。
dPTFE 促进了更快的生物膜定植,并在膜的内、外表面靠近再生部位富集了更多的革兰氏阴性菌和厌氧菌。dPTFE 膜可以暴露于口腔部位使用,但仍应考虑生物膜控制方法。该研究在 Clinicaltrials.gov 上进行了回顾性注册(NCT04329351)。