• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测医疗保险优势计划中早期姑息治疗识别的患者死亡率:机器学习模型的特征

Predicting Patient Mortality for Earlier Palliative Care Identification in Medicare Advantage Plans: Features of a Machine Learning Model.

作者信息

Bowers Anne, Drake Chelsea, Makarkin Alexi E, Monzyk Robert, Maity Biswajit, Telle Andrew

机构信息

Evernorth Health, Inc, St. Louis, MO, United States.

出版信息

JMIR AI. 2023 Feb 20;2:e42253. doi: 10.2196/42253.

DOI:10.2196/42253
PMID:38875557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11041411/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Machine learning (ML) can offer greater precision and sensitivity in predicting Medicare patient end of life and potential need for palliative services compared to provider recommendations alone. However, earlier ML research on older community dwelling Medicare beneficiaries has provided insufficient exploration of key model feature impacts and the role of the social determinants of health.

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the development of a binary classification ML model predicting 1-year mortality among Medicare Advantage plan members aged ≥65 years (N=318,774) and further examines the top features of the predictive model.

METHODS

A light gradient-boosted trees model configuration was selected based on 5-fold cross-validation. The model was trained with 80% of cases (n=255,020) using randomized feature generation periods, with 20% (n=63,754) reserved as a holdout for validation. The final algorithm used 907 feature inputs extracted primarily from claims and administrative data capturing patient diagnoses, service utilization, demographics, and census tract-based social determinants index measures.

RESULTS

The total sample had an actual mortality prevalence of 3.9% in the 2018 outcome period. The final model correctly predicted 44.2% of patient expirations among the top 1% of highest risk members (AUC=0.84; 95% CI 0.83-0.85) versus 24.0% predicted by the model iteration using only age, gender, and select high-risk utilization features (AUC=0.74; 95% CI 0.73-0.74). The most important algorithm features included patient demographics, diagnoses, pharmacy utilization, mean costs, and certain social determinants of health.

CONCLUSIONS

The final ML model better predicts Medicare Advantage member end of life using a variety of routinely collected data and supports earlier patient identification for palliative care.

摘要

背景

与仅依据医疗服务提供者的建议相比,机器学习(ML)在预测医疗保险患者的生命终结以及对姑息治疗服务的潜在需求方面,能够提供更高的精度和灵敏度。然而,早期针对居住在社区的老年医疗保险受益人的机器学习研究,对关键模型特征的影响以及健康的社会决定因素的作用,探索尚不充分。

目的

本研究描述了一个二元分类机器学习模型的开发过程,该模型用于预测年龄≥65岁的医疗保险优势计划成员(N = 318,774)的1年死亡率,并进一步研究该预测模型的主要特征。

方法

基于五折交叉验证选择了轻梯度提升树模型配置。使用随机特征生成期,用80%的病例(n = 255,020)对模型进行训练,将20%(n = 63,754)留作验证集。最终算法使用了907个特征输入,这些输入主要从索赔和管理数据中提取,涵盖患者诊断、服务利用情况、人口统计学信息以及基于普查区的社会决定因素指数测量值。

结果

在2018年的观察期内,总样本的实际死亡率为3.9%。最终模型在风险最高的前1%成员中正确预测了44.2%的患者死亡情况(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.84;95%置信区间0.83 - 0.85),而仅使用年龄、性别和选定的高风险利用特征的模型迭代预测的比例为24.0%(AUC = 0.74;95%置信区间0.73 - 0.74)。最重要的算法特征包括患者人口统计学信息、诊断、药房使用情况、平均费用以及某些健康的社会决定因素。

结论

最终的机器学习模型利用各种常规收集的数据,能更好地预测医疗保险优势计划成员的生命终结情况,并支持更早地识别出需要姑息治疗的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37bf/11041411/501a701097a6/ai_v2i1e42253_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37bf/11041411/20f1c1be692d/ai_v2i1e42253_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37bf/11041411/9198af95295f/ai_v2i1e42253_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37bf/11041411/501a701097a6/ai_v2i1e42253_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37bf/11041411/20f1c1be692d/ai_v2i1e42253_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37bf/11041411/9198af95295f/ai_v2i1e42253_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37bf/11041411/501a701097a6/ai_v2i1e42253_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting Patient Mortality for Earlier Palliative Care Identification in Medicare Advantage Plans: Features of a Machine Learning Model.预测医疗保险优势计划中早期姑息治疗识别的患者死亡率:机器学习模型的特征
JMIR AI. 2023 Feb 20;2:e42253. doi: 10.2196/42253.
2
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
3
Economic burden in direct costs of concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma in a Medicare Advantage population.医疗保险优势人群中慢性阻塞性肺疾病和哮喘并存的直接成本经济负担。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Mar;14(2):176-85. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.2.176.
4
Development and validation of 15-month mortality prediction models: a retrospective observational comparison of machine-learning techniques in a national sample of Medicare recipients.开发和验证 15 个月死亡率预测模型:对全国医疗保险接受者样本中机器学习技术的回顾性观察比较。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 16;9(7):e022935. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022935.
5
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With Traditional Models for Use of Administrative Claims With Electronic Medical Records to Predict Heart Failure Outcomes.利用电子病历中的行政索赔数据进行机器学习方法与传统模型预测心力衰竭结局的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18962.
6
Association between health system specialty pharmacy use and health care costs among national sample of Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.医疗保险优势受益人群中,医疗保健系统专科药房的使用与医疗费用之间的关联。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Feb;28(2):244-254. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.2.244.
7
Predicting potential palliative care beneficiaries for health plans: A generalized machine learning pipeline.预测健康计划的潜在姑息治疗受益者:一种通用的机器学习流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Nov;123:103922. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103922. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
8
Assessing performance of ZCTA-level and Census Tract-level social and environmental risk factors in a model predicting hospital events.评估 ZCTA 级别和人口普查区级别社会和环境风险因素在预测医院事件模型中的表现。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jun;326:115943. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115943. Epub 2023 May 2.
9
Using machine learning to predict risk of incident opioid use disorder among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries: A prognostic study.使用机器学习预测医保自费人群中阿片类药物使用障碍事件风险:预后研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 17;15(7):e0235981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235981. eCollection 2020.
10
Low-Cost Generic Program Use by Medicare Beneficiaries: Implications for Medication Exposure Misclassification in Administrative Claims Data.医疗保险受益人的低成本通用药物计划使用:对行政索赔数据中药物暴露错误分类的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jun;22(6):741-51. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.6.741.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Challenges and Opportunities of AI in End-of-Life Palliative Care: Integrative Review.人工智能在临终姑息治疗中的伦理挑战与机遇:综合综述
Interact J Med Res. 2025 May 14;14:e73517. doi: 10.2196/73517.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting Sepsis Mortality in a Population-Based National Database: Machine Learning Approach.基于人群的国家数据库中预测脓毒症死亡率:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 13;24(4):e29982. doi: 10.2196/29982.
2
Comparison of intuitive assessment and palliative care screening tool in the early identification of patients needing palliative care.直观评估与姑息治疗筛查工具在早期识别需要姑息治疗患者中的比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 23;12(1):4955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08886-7.
3
Palliative Care Exposure Relative to Predicted Risk of Six-Month Mortality in Hospitalized Adults.
住院成人姑息治疗暴露与六个月死亡率预测风险的关系。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 May;63(5):645-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
4
Epidemiologic Trends, Social Determinants, and Brain Health: The Role of Life Course Inequalities.流行病学趋势、社会决定因素与大脑健康:生活历程不平等的作用。
Stroke. 2022 Feb;53(2):437-443. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.032609. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
Predicting potential palliative care beneficiaries for health plans: A generalized machine learning pipeline.预测健康计划的潜在姑息治疗受益者:一种通用的机器学习流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Nov;123:103922. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103922. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
6
Early Palliative Care Is Associated With Reduced Emergency Department Utilization in Pancreatic Cancer.早期姑息治疗与胰腺癌患者急诊就诊次数减少相关。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 1;44(5):181-186. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000802.
7
Using electronic health records and claims data to identify high-risk patients likely to benefit from palliative care.利用电子健康记录和索赔数据来识别可能从姑息治疗中受益的高危患者。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):e7-e15. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88578.
8
Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Mortality and Allocate Palliative Care for Older Patients With Hip Fracture.机器学习算法预测死亡率并为老年髋部骨折患者分配姑息治疗。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
9
Identification of patients with potential palliative care needs: A systematic review of screening tools in primary care.识别有潜在姑息治疗需求的患者:对初级保健中筛查工具的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;34(8):989-1005. doi: 10.1177/0269216320929552. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
10
NECPAL tool prognostication in advanced chronic illness: a rapid review and expert consensus.NECPAL 工具预测晚期慢性疾病:快速综述和专家共识。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 May;12(e1):e10-e20. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002126. Epub 2020 Apr 2.