• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用电子健康记录和索赔数据来识别可能从姑息治疗中受益的高危患者。

Using electronic health records and claims data to identify high-risk patients likely to benefit from palliative care.

机构信息

Washington University School of Medicine, 600 S Taylor Ave, Ste 102, St Louis, MO 63110. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):e7-e15. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88578.

DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2021.88578
PMID:33471463
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Palliative care has been demonstrated to have positive effects for patients, families, health care providers, and health systems. Early identification of patients who are likely to benefit from palliative care would increase opportunities to provide these services to those most in need. This study predicted all-cause mortality of patients as a surrogate for patients who could benefit from palliative care.

STUDY DESIGN

Claims and electronic health record (EHR) data for 59,639 patients from a large integrated health care system were utilized.

METHODS

A deep learning algorithm-a long short-term memory (LSTM) model-was compared with other machine learning models: deep neural networks, random forest, and logistic regression. We conducted prediction analyses using combined claims data and EHR data, only claims data, and only EHR data, respectively. In each case, the data were randomly split into training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%) data sets. The models with different hyperparameters were trained using the training data, and the model with the best performance on the validation data was selected as the final model. The testing data were used to provide an unbiased performance evaluation of the final model.

RESULTS

In all modeling scenarios, LSTM models outperformed the other 3 models, and using combined claims and EHR data yielded the best performance.

CONCLUSIONS

LSTM models can effectively predict mortality by using a combination of EHR data and administrative claims data. The model could be used as a promising clinical tool to aid clinicians in early identification of appropriate patients for palliative care consultations.

摘要

目的

姑息治疗已被证明对患者、家属、医疗保健提供者和医疗系统具有积极影响。早期识别可能从姑息治疗中受益的患者将增加向最需要的人提供这些服务的机会。本研究通过预测患者的全因死亡率,来预测哪些患者可能受益于姑息治疗。

研究设计

利用来自大型综合医疗保健系统的 59639 名患者的索赔和电子健康记录 (EHR) 数据。

方法

一种深度学习算法——长短期记忆 (LSTM) 模型——与其他机器学习模型(深度神经网络、随机森林和逻辑回归)进行了比较。我们分别使用合并的索赔数据和 EHR 数据、仅索赔数据和仅 EHR 数据进行预测分析。在每种情况下,数据都随机分为训练(80%)、验证(10%)和测试(10%)数据集。使用训练数据训练不同超参数的模型,并选择验证数据性能最佳的模型作为最终模型。使用测试数据对最终模型进行无偏性能评估。

结果

在所有建模场景中,LSTM 模型均优于其他 3 种模型,且使用合并的索赔和 EHR 数据可获得最佳性能。

结论

LSTM 模型可以通过结合 EHR 数据和管理索赔数据有效预测死亡率。该模型可作为一种有前途的临床工具,帮助临床医生早期识别适合姑息治疗咨询的患者。

相似文献

1
Using electronic health records and claims data to identify high-risk patients likely to benefit from palliative care.利用电子健康记录和索赔数据来识别可能从姑息治疗中受益的高危患者。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):e7-e15. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88578.
2
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With Traditional Models for Use of Administrative Claims With Electronic Medical Records to Predict Heart Failure Outcomes.利用电子病历中的行政索赔数据进行机器学习方法与传统模型预测心力衰竭结局的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18962.
3
Electronic phenotyping of health outcomes of interest using a linked claims-electronic health record database: Findings from a machine learning pilot project.使用链接的索赔-电子健康记录数据库对感兴趣的健康结果进行电子表型分析:来自机器学习试点项目的结果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1507-1517. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab036.
4
New onset delirium prediction using machine learning and long short-term memory (LSTM) in electronic health record.基于机器学习和长短期记忆网络(LSTM)的电子病历中新发谵妄预测。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):120-131. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac210.
5
Dynamic ElecTronic hEalth reCord deTection (DETECT) of individuals at risk of a first episode of psychosis: a case-control development and validation study.动态电子健康记录检测(DETECT)对首发精神病风险个体的识别:一项病例对照研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 May;2(5):e229-e239. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30024-8. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
6
Application of a time-series deep learning model to predict cardiac dysrhythmias in electronic health records.应用时间序列深度学习模型预测电子健康记录中的心律失常。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 13;16(9):e0239007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239007. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparing Population-based Risk-stratification Model Performance Using Demographic, Diagnosis and Medication Data Extracted From Outpatient Electronic Health Records Versus Administrative Claims.使用从门诊电子健康记录与行政索赔中提取的人口统计学、诊断和用药数据比较基于人群的风险分层模型性能。
Med Care. 2017 Aug;55(8):789-796. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000754.
8
An integrated LSTM-HeteroRGNN model for interpretable opioid overdose risk prediction.基于集成 LSTM-HeteroRGNN 的可解释阿片类药物过量风险预测模型。
Artif Intell Med. 2023 Jan;135:102439. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102439. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
9
A comprehensive evaluation for the prediction of mortality in intensive care units with LSTM networks: patients with cardiovascular disease.使用长短期记忆网络(LSTM)对重症监护病房中心血管疾病患者的死亡率预测进行综合评估。
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2020 Aug 27;65(4):435-446. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2018-0206.
10
Applying interpretable deep learning models to identify chronic cough patients using EHR data.应用可解释的深度学习模型,利用电子病历数据识别慢性咳嗽患者。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Oct;210:106395. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106395. Epub 2021 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
External validation of a proprietary risk model for 1-year mortality in community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older.针对65岁及以上社区居住成年人1年死亡率的专有风险模型的外部验证。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jul 1;32(7):1110-1119. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf062.
2
Leveraging patients' longitudinal data to improve the Hospital One-year Mortality Risk.利用患者的纵向数据来改善医院一年死亡率风险。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2025 Mar 4;13(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s13755-024-00332-4. eCollection 2025 Dec.
3
INNOVATIONS IN DIGITAL HEALTH TO IMPROVE CARE DELIVERY: THE BJC HEALTHCARE/WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE HEALTHCARE INNOVATION LAB.
数字医疗创新改善医疗服务:圣路易斯华盛顿大学医学院/巴恩斯-犹太医院医疗创新实验室。
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2024;134:239-251.
4
Predicting Patient Mortality for Earlier Palliative Care Identification in Medicare Advantage Plans: Features of a Machine Learning Model.预测医疗保险优势计划中早期姑息治疗识别的患者死亡率:机器学习模型的特征
JMIR AI. 2023 Feb 20;2:e42253. doi: 10.2196/42253.
5
Utilization of EHRs for clinical trials: a systematic review.利用电子健康记录进行临床试验:系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Mar 18;24(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02177-7.
6
Exploring the Potential of Chatbots in Critical Care Nephrology.探索聊天机器人在重症监护肾脏病学中的潜力。
Medicines (Basel). 2023 Oct 20;10(10):58. doi: 10.3390/medicines10100058.
7
A cohort of patients in New York State with an alcohol use disorder and subsequent treatment information - A merging of two administrative data sources.纽约州患有酒精使用障碍及后续治疗信息的患者队列 - 两个行政数据源的合并。
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Aug;144:104443. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104443. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
8
Developing an LSTM Model to Identify Surgical Site Infections using Electronic Healthcare Records.使用电子健康记录开发长短期记忆模型以识别手术部位感染
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2023 Jun 16;2023:330-339. eCollection 2023.
9
Evaluating equity in performance of an electronic health record-based 6-month mortality risk model to trigger palliative care consultation: a retrospective model validation analysis.评估基于电子健康记录的 6 个月死亡率风险模型在触发姑息治疗咨询方面的表现公平性:回顾性模型验证分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Sep;32(9):503-516. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015173. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
10
External validation of the risk prediction model for early diabetic kidney disease in Taiwan population: a retrospective cohort study.台湾人群早期糖尿病肾病风险预测模型的外部验证:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 13;12(12):e059139. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059139.