• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专业照护者的痴呆症特异性伦理自我效能感量表的编制与初步验证。

Development and prima facie validation of the Dementia-Specific Ethical Self-Efficacy scale for professional caregivers.

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.

出版信息

Dementia (London). 2024 Aug;23(6):1036-1051. doi: 10.1177/14713012241262833. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1177/14713012241262833
PMID:38876118
Abstract

AIM

To develop and validate a scale for measuring professional caregivers' ethical self-efficacy in dementia care.

BACKGROUND

Professional caregivers of people with dementia make ethical decisions on a day-to-day basis, and it is important that they feel confident when doing so. Moreover, confidence, or self-efficacy, influences caregivers' behaviour and well-being and may be a predictor of competence. However, there is no scale for measuring ethical self-efficacy. This study aims to fill this gap.

METHODS

This study concerns the development and prima facie validation of the Dementia-Specific Ethical Self-Efficacy (DemESE) scale. During development, we identified dementia-specific ethical principles and generated items representing ethical conflicts of principles. In the subsequent validation, we administered the scale to experts and professional caregivers in dementia care. We assessed the relevance of the scale using a content validity index and tested validity and reliability using Cronbach's alpha. To further enhance validity, we compared the scale with analogous self-efficacy scales using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The quantitative testing of DemESE revealed that the scale exhibited acceptable levels of internal consistency and reliability. This finding was supported by Cronbach's alpha. In addition, the content validity index and Pearson correlation coefficient provided evidence of the scale's relevance and validity.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that DemESE is a promising tool for assessing professional caregivers' ethical self-efficacy in dementia care and may be used to measure ethical self-efficacy - that is, confidence in ethical decision-making in dementia care.

摘要

目的

开发并验证用于测量痴呆症护理专业护理人员伦理自我效能感的量表。

背景

痴呆症患者的专业护理人员每天都要做出伦理决策,他们对此有信心非常重要。此外,信心或自我效能感会影响护理人员的行为和幸福感,并且可能是能力的预测指标。然而,目前尚无用于衡量伦理自我效能感的量表。本研究旨在填补这一空白。

方法

本研究涉及用于测量痴呆症特定伦理自我效能感(DemESE)量表的开发和初步验证。在开发过程中,我们确定了痴呆症特定的伦理原则,并生成了代表伦理原则冲突的项目。在随后的验证中,我们向痴呆症护理方面的专家和专业护理人员管理该量表。我们使用内容有效性指数来评估量表的相关性,并使用 Cronbach's alpha 测试有效性和可靠性。为了进一步提高有效性,我们使用 Pearson 相关系数将量表与类似的自我效能感量表进行比较。

结果

对 DemESE 的定量测试表明,该量表具有可接受的内部一致性和可靠性水平。这一发现得到了 Cronbach's alpha 的支持。此外,内容有效性指数和 Pearson 相关系数为量表的相关性和有效性提供了证据。

结论

结果表明,DemESE 是一种评估痴呆症护理专业护理人员伦理自我效能感的有前途的工具,可用于衡量痴呆症护理中的伦理自我效能感,即对痴呆症护理中伦理决策的信心。

相似文献

1
Development and prima facie validation of the Dementia-Specific Ethical Self-Efficacy scale for professional caregivers.专业照护者的痴呆症特异性伦理自我效能感量表的编制与初步验证。
Dementia (London). 2024 Aug;23(6):1036-1051. doi: 10.1177/14713012241262833. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
The Competence Scale in Managing Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (CS-MBPSD) for family caregivers: Instrument development and cross-sectional validation study.家庭照顾者痴呆行为和心理症状管理能力量表(CS-MBPSD):工具开发与横断面验证研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 May;129:104205. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104205. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
3
Translation and psychometric testing of the sense of competence in Dementia Care Staff Scale in Chinese amongst dementia care staff in nursing homes of China.在中国养老院的痴呆症护理人员中,对痴呆症护理人员能力感量表进行中文翻译和心理计量学测试。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 21;23(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03845-x.
4
Exploring the use of the Dementia Management Strategies Scale in caregivers of persons with dementia in Singapore.探讨在新加坡痴呆症患者照顾者中使用痴呆症管理策略量表的情况。
Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(8):935-41. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2013.768209. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
5
Detecting Predeath Grief in Family Caregivers of Persons With Dementia: Validity and Utility of the Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory in a Multiethnic Asian Population.检测痴呆患者家庭成员的临终前悲伤:马维特-迈泽尔照顾者悲伤量表在多民族亚洲人群中的有效性和实用性。
Gerontologist. 2018 Mar 19;58(2):e150-e159. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx097.
6
Development and Validation of the Dementia Caregiver Burden Scale: A Tool for Community-Dwelling Dementia Caregiver.痴呆症照顾者负担量表的制定与验证:适用于社区居住的痴呆症照顾者的工具。
J Nurs Res. 2024 Aug 1;32(4):e337. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000625.
7
Validation of family conflict scales for family caregivers of persons with dementia in long-term care facilities and exploration of family conflicts and support.验证长期护理机构痴呆患者家庭照顾者的家庭冲突量表,探讨家庭冲突和支持。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 May;30(5):749-759. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217002356. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
8
Development of the empowerment scale for family caregivers of community-dwelling people with dementia in Japan.日本社区痴呆患者家庭照顾者赋权量表的开发。
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020 Apr;17(2):e12311. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12311. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
Positive Aspects of Caregiving Questionnaire.照顾问卷的积极方面。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2017 Mar;30(2):77-83. doi: 10.1177/0891988716686831. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
10
Reliability and validation of the Positive Aspects of Caregiving scale among Japanese caregivers of people with dementia.痴呆症患者日本照料者护理积极方面量表的信效度研究
Int J Nurs Sci. 2021 Mar 17;8(2):210-214. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.007. eCollection 2021 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing ethical self-efficacy among dementia caregiver staff: A mixed-methods feasibility study of the care programme.提高痴呆症护理人员的道德自我效能:护理计划的混合方法可行性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jan 15;8:100294. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100294. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Ethical self-efficacy among healthcare professionals caring for people with dementia: a brief pre- and post-report on the CARE intervention.照顾痴呆症患者的医护人员的伦理自我效能感:CARE 干预的简短预报告和后报告。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01106-z.