NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital Renal Department, Sydney, Australia.
Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Sweden; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Jul;213:111745. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111745. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
AIMS: To assess adherence and persistence to sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in routine care. METHODS: Using retrospective healthcare data from the Stockholm region, Sweden, we evaluated new-users of these agents during 2015-2020. We investigated adherence (≥80 % of days covered by an active supply), persistence (no treatment gap ≥ 60 days), and predictors for non-adherence and non-persistence. RESULTS: We identified 24,470 new-users of SGLT2i (10,743), GLP1-RA (10,315), and/or DPP4i (9,488). Over 2.8 years median follow-up, the proportion demonstrating adherence was higher for SGLT2i (57 %) than DPP4i (53 %, comparison p < 0.001), and for GLP1-RA than DPP4i (54 % vs 53 %, p < 0.001). Similarly, persistence was higher for both SGLT2i and GLP-RA than DPP4i (respectively, 50 % vs 44 %, p < 0.001; 49 % vs 44 %, p < 0.001). Overall adherence was better among users who were older, had a history of high blood pressure, used more non-diabetic medications, had lower Hba1c, had better kidney function, and had completed secondary schooling or university. Women had worse adherence to SGLT2i and GLP1-RA than DPP4i. CONCLUSIONS: We report adherence and persistence to SGLT2i, GLP1-RA and DPP4i in routine care, and identify prognostic factors that could inform implementation interventions to improve uptake of these important therapies.
目的:评估钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)、胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP1-RA)和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂(DPP4i)在常规治疗中的依从性和持久性。
方法:使用瑞典斯德哥尔摩地区的回顾性医疗数据,我们评估了 2015 年至 2020 年期间这些药物的新使用者。我们调查了依从性(≥80%的活跃供应天数)、持久性(无治疗间隔≥60 天)以及不依从和不持久的预测因素。
结果:我们确定了 24470 名新使用 SGLT2i(10743 名)、GLP1-RA(10315 名)和/或 DPP4i(9488 名)的新使用者。在 2.8 年的中位随访期间,SGLT2i 的依从率(57%)高于 DPP4i(53%,比较 p<0.001),GLP1-RA 高于 DPP4i(54%比 53%,p<0.001)。同样,SGLT2i 和 GLP-RA 的持久性均高于 DPP4i(分别为 50%比 44%,p<0.001;49%比 44%,p<0.001)。在年龄较大、有高血压病史、使用更多非糖尿病药物、HbA1c 较低、肾功能较好、完成中学或大学教育的患者中,总体依从性更好。女性对 SGLT2i 和 GLP1-RA 的依从性差于 DPP4i。
结论:我们报告了 SGLT2i、GLP1-RA 和 DPP4i 在常规治疗中的依从性和持久性,并确定了可能为改善这些重要治疗方法的采用提供信息的实施干预措施的预后因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024-3-1