• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对友谊悖论在权重和属性方面的全面推广。

A comprehensive generalization of the Friendship Paradox to weights and attributes.

作者信息

Evtushenko Anna, Kleinberg Jon

机构信息

Department of Information Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 14;14(1):13730. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63167-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-63167-9
PMID:38877083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11178832/
Abstract

The Friendship Paradox is a simple and powerful statement about node degrees in a graph. However, it only applies to undirected graphs with no edge weights, and the only node characteristic it concerns is degree. Since many social networks are more complex than that, it is useful to generalize this phenomenon, if possible, and a number of papers have proposed different generalizations. Here, we unify these generalizations in a common framework, retaining the focus on undirected graphs and allowing for weighted edges and for numeric node attributes other than degree to be considered, since this extension allows for a clean characterization and links to the original concepts most naturally. While the original Friendship Paradox and the Weighted Friendship Paradox hold for all graphs, considering non-degree attributes actually makes the extensions fail around 50% of the time, given random attribute assignment. We provide simple correlation-based rules to see whether an attribute-based version of the paradox holds. In addition to theory, our simulation and data results show how all the concepts can be applied to synthetic and real networks. Where applicable, we draw connections to prior work to make this an accessible and comprehensive paper that lets one understand the math behind the Friendship Paradox and its basic extensions.

摘要

友谊悖论是关于图中节点度的一个简单而有力的表述。然而,它仅适用于没有边权重的无向图,且它所关注的唯一节点特征是度。由于许多社交网络比这更复杂,若有可能对这一现象进行推广将很有用,并且已有多篇论文提出了不同的推广方式。在此,我们将这些推广统一在一个通用框架中,保持对无向图的关注,并允许考虑加权边以及除度之外的数值型节点属性,因为这种扩展能最自然地对其进行清晰的刻画并与原始概念建立联系。虽然原始友谊悖论和加权友谊悖论对所有图都成立,但考虑非度属性时,在随机属性分配的情况下,实际上约50%的扩展会不成立。我们提供基于简单相关性的规则来判断基于属性的悖论版本是否成立。除了理论内容,我们的模拟和数据结果展示了所有这些概念如何应用于合成网络和真实网络。在适用的地方,我们将与先前的工作建立联系,以使本文易于理解且全面,让读者理解友谊悖论及其基本扩展背后的数学原理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/11178832/8ae896830689/41598_2024_63167_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/11178832/b3f0951a65f9/41598_2024_63167_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/11178832/95145a88d587/41598_2024_63167_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/11178832/7681ef250553/41598_2024_63167_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/11178832/8ae896830689/41598_2024_63167_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/11178832/b3f0951a65f9/41598_2024_63167_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/11178832/95145a88d587/41598_2024_63167_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/11178832/7681ef250553/41598_2024_63167_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b0/11178832/8ae896830689/41598_2024_63167_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A comprehensive generalization of the Friendship Paradox to weights and attributes.对友谊悖论在权重和属性方面的全面推广。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 14;14(1):13730. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63167-9.
2
Node-based generalized friendship paradox fails.基于节点的广义友谊悖论不成立。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 6;13(1):2074. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29268-7.
3
Comparison of Different Generalizations of Clustering Coefficient and Local Efficiency for Weighted Undirected Graphs.加权无向图聚类系数和局部效率不同推广的比较
Neural Comput. 2017 Feb;29(2):313-331. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00914. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
Qualities and Inequalities in Online Social Networks through the Lens of the Generalized Friendship Paradox.透过广义友谊悖论视角看在线社交网络中的特质与不平等现象
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0143633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143633. eCollection 2016.
5
Generalized friendship paradox in networks with tunable degree-attribute correlation.具有可调度-属性相关性的网络中的广义友谊悖论
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Aug;90(2):022809. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.022809. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
6
Generalized friendship paradox in complex networks: the case of scientific collaboration.复杂网络中的广义友谊悖论:以科学合作为例
Sci Rep. 2014 Apr 8;4:4603. doi: 10.1038/srep04603.
7
Copula-based analysis of the generalized friendship paradox in clustered networks.基于连接函数的聚类网络中广义友谊悖论分析
Chaos. 2022 Dec;32(12):123139. doi: 10.1063/5.0122351.
8
Analytical approach to the generalized friendship paradox in networks with correlated attributes.具有相关属性的网络中广义友谊悖论的分析方法。
Phys Rev E. 2021 Nov;104(5-1):054301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.054301.
9
The enmity paradox.敌友悖论。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 16;13(1):20040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47167-9.
10
Coupled Node Similarity Learning for Community Detection in Attributed Networks.属性网络中用于社区检测的耦合节点相似性学习
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Jun 17;20(6):471. doi: 10.3390/e20060471.

本文引用的文献

1
Node-based generalized friendship paradox fails.基于节点的广义友谊悖论不成立。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 6;13(1):2074. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29268-7.
2
Monophily in social networks introduces similarity among friends-of-friends.社交网络中的单一聚类会导致朋友的朋友之间具有相似性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Apr;2(4):284-290. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0321-8. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
3
Qualities and Inequalities in Online Social Networks through the Lens of the Generalized Friendship Paradox.透过广义友谊悖论视角看在线社交网络中的特质与不平等现象
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0143633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143633. eCollection 2016.
4
Generalized friendship paradox in complex networks: the case of scientific collaboration.复杂网络中的广义友谊悖论:以科学合作为例
Sci Rep. 2014 Apr 8;4:4603. doi: 10.1038/srep04603.