Suppr超能文献

促使女性参与制定辅助阴道分娩的研究议程。

Engaging women to set the research agenda for assisted vaginal birth.

机构信息

Evidence Based Health Care Post-graduate Program, Sao Paulo Federal University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Prodigioso Volcán, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14054. doi: 10.1111/hex.14054.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Public and patient involvement can provide crucial insights to optimise research by enhancing relevance and appropriateness of studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) engaged in an inclusive process to ensure that both technical experts and women had a voice in defining the research gaps and needs to increase or reintroduce the use of assisted vaginal birth (AVB) in settings where this intervention is needed but unavailable or underused.

METHODS

We describe the methods and outcomes of online workshops led by WHO to obtain women representatives' perspectives about AVB research gaps and needs.

RESULTS

After technical experts created a list of research questions based on various evidence syntheses, WHO organised four online workshops with 31 women's representatives from 27 mostly low- and middle-income (LMIC) countries. Women rated the importance and priority of the research questions proposed by the technical experts, improving and broadening some of them, added new questions, and voiced their main concerns and views about AVB. Women helped to put the research questions into context in their communities, highlighted neglected factors/dimensions that influence practices and affect women's experience during labour and childbirth, underscored less salient consequences of AVB, and highlighted the main concerns of women about research on AVB. The consolidated vision of technical experts and women's representatives resulted in a technical brief published by WHO. The technical brief is expected to stimulate global research and action closely aligned with women's priorities.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a successful experience of engaging women, mostly from LMICs, in the identification of research gaps and needs to reintroduce AVB use. This process contributed to better aligning research questions with women's views, concerns, and priorities. Given the scarcity of reports about engaging women from LMICs to optimise research, this successful experience can serve as an inspiration for future work.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Women representatives were involved at every stage of the workshops described in full in this manuscript.

摘要

简介

公众和患者的参与可以提供重要的见解,通过增强研究的相关性和适当性来优化研究。世界卫生组织(WHO)开展了一项包容性进程,以确保技术专家和妇女都有机会参与定义研究差距和需求,以增加或重新引入在需要但无法获得或使用不足的情况下使用辅助阴道分娩(AVB)。

方法

我们描述了由世界卫生组织领导的在线研讨会的方法和结果,以了解妇女代表对 AVB 研究差距和需求的看法。

结果

在技术专家根据各种证据综合分析创建研究问题清单之后,世界卫生组织组织了四场在线研讨会,有来自 27 个主要中低收入国家的 31 名妇女代表参加。妇女对技术专家提出的研究问题的重要性和优先级进行了评分,改进和拓宽了其中一些问题,增加了新的问题,并表达了她们对 AVB 的主要关注和看法。妇女帮助将研究问题置于社区背景下,强调了影响实践和影响妇女分娩期间体验的被忽视因素/维度,强调了 AVB 的影响较小的后果,并强调了妇女对 AVB 研究的主要关注。技术专家和妇女代表的综合愿景促成了世界卫生组织发布的一份技术简报。该技术简报有望激发与妇女优先事项紧密一致的全球研究和行动。

结论

我们描述了一个成功的经验,即让大多数来自中低收入国家的妇女参与确定重新引入 AVB 使用的研究差距和需求。这一过程有助于更好地使研究问题与妇女的观点、关切和优先事项保持一致。鉴于关于让来自中低收入国家的妇女参与优化研究的报告很少,这一成功经验可以为未来的工作提供启示。

患者或公众参与

妇女代表在本手稿中详细描述的研讨会的各个阶段都参与其中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验