Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana.
Glob Heart. 2024 Jun 12;19(1):51. doi: 10.5334/gh.1329. eCollection 2024.
Individuals living with hypertension are at an increased risk of cardiovascular- and cerebrovascular-related outcomes. Interventions implemented at the community level to improve hypertension control are considered useful to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; however, systematic evaluation of such community level interventions among patients living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is scarce.
Nine databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster randomized control trials (cRCTs) implementing community level interventions in adults with hypertension in LMICs. Studies were included based on explicit focus on blood pressure control. Quality assessment was done using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (ROBS 2). Results were presented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted for studies that reported continuous outcome measures.
We identified and screened 7125 articles. Eighteen studies, 7 RCTs and 11 cRCTs were included in the analysis. The overall summary effect of blood pressure control was significant, risk ratio = 1.48 (95%CI = 1.40-1.57, n = 12). Risk ratio for RCTs was 1.68 (95%CI = 1.40-2.01, n = 5), for cRCTs risk ratio = 1.46 (95%CI = 1.32-1.61, n = 7). For studies that reported individual data for the multicomponent interventions, the risk ratio was 1.27 (95% CI = 1.04-1.54, n = 3).
Community-based strategies are relevant in addressing the burden of hypertension in LMICs. Community-based interventions can help decentralize hypertension care in LMIC and address the access to care gap without diminishing the quality of hypertension control.
患有高血压的个体发生心血管和脑血管相关结局的风险增加。在社区层面实施干预措施以改善高血压控制被认为有助于预防心血管和脑血管事件;然而,在中低收入国家(LMICs),针对此类社区层面干预措施的系统评估却很少。
在九个数据库中搜索了在 LMICs 中针对高血压成年人实施社区层面干预的随机对照试验(RCT)和整群随机对照试验(cRCT)。基于对血压控制的明确关注,纳入了研究。使用修订后的 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险工具(ROBS 2)对质量进行评估。结果根据系统评价和荟萃分析的 Preferred Reporting Items(PRISMA)清单呈现。对报告连续结局测量的研究进行了固定效应荟萃分析。
我们确定并筛选了 7125 篇文章。共有 18 项研究,7 项 RCT 和 11 项 cRCT 纳入分析。血压控制的总体综合效应显著,风险比=1.48(95%CI=1.40-1.57,n=12)。RCT 的风险比为 1.68(95%CI=1.40-2.01,n=5),cRCT 的风险比为 1.46(95%CI=1.32-1.61,n=7)。对于报告多组分干预的个体数据的研究,风险比为 1.27(95%CI=1.04-1.54,n=3)。
基于社区的策略在解决 LMIC 中高血压负担方面具有重要意义。基于社区的干预措施可以帮助在 LMIC 中分散高血压护理,并解决获得护理的差距,而不会降低高血压控制的质量。