• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的策略改善中低收入国家高血压患者健康相关结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Community-Based Strategies to Improve Health-Related Outcomes in People Living With Hypertension in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana.

出版信息

Glob Heart. 2024 Jun 12;19(1):51. doi: 10.5334/gh.1329. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.5334/gh.1329
PMID:38883258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11177843/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals living with hypertension are at an increased risk of cardiovascular- and cerebrovascular-related outcomes. Interventions implemented at the community level to improve hypertension control are considered useful to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; however, systematic evaluation of such community level interventions among patients living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is scarce.

METHODS

Nine databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster randomized control trials (cRCTs) implementing community level interventions in adults with hypertension in LMICs. Studies were included based on explicit focus on blood pressure control. Quality assessment was done using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (ROBS 2). Results were presented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted for studies that reported continuous outcome measures.

RESULTS

We identified and screened 7125 articles. Eighteen studies, 7 RCTs and 11 cRCTs were included in the analysis. The overall summary effect of blood pressure control was significant, risk ratio = 1.48 (95%CI = 1.40-1.57, n = 12). Risk ratio for RCTs was 1.68 (95%CI = 1.40-2.01, n = 5), for cRCTs risk ratio = 1.46 (95%CI = 1.32-1.61, n = 7). For studies that reported individual data for the multicomponent interventions, the risk ratio was 1.27 (95% CI = 1.04-1.54, n = 3).

DISCUSSION

Community-based strategies are relevant in addressing the burden of hypertension in LMICs. Community-based interventions can help decentralize hypertension care in LMIC and address the access to care gap without diminishing the quality of hypertension control.

摘要

背景

患有高血压的个体发生心血管和脑血管相关结局的风险增加。在社区层面实施干预措施以改善高血压控制被认为有助于预防心血管和脑血管事件;然而,在中低收入国家(LMICs),针对此类社区层面干预措施的系统评估却很少。

方法

在九个数据库中搜索了在 LMICs 中针对高血压成年人实施社区层面干预的随机对照试验(RCT)和整群随机对照试验(cRCT)。基于对血压控制的明确关注,纳入了研究。使用修订后的 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险工具(ROBS 2)对质量进行评估。结果根据系统评价和荟萃分析的 Preferred Reporting Items(PRISMA)清单呈现。对报告连续结局测量的研究进行了固定效应荟萃分析。

结果

我们确定并筛选了 7125 篇文章。共有 18 项研究,7 项 RCT 和 11 项 cRCT 纳入分析。血压控制的总体综合效应显著,风险比=1.48(95%CI=1.40-1.57,n=12)。RCT 的风险比为 1.68(95%CI=1.40-2.01,n=5),cRCT 的风险比为 1.46(95%CI=1.32-1.61,n=7)。对于报告多组分干预的个体数据的研究,风险比为 1.27(95%CI=1.04-1.54,n=3)。

讨论

基于社区的策略在解决 LMIC 中高血压负担方面具有重要意义。基于社区的干预措施可以帮助在 LMIC 中分散高血压护理,并解决获得护理的差距,而不会降低高血压控制的质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a892/11177843/a46152116bbb/gh-19-1-1329-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a892/11177843/0eedb6321494/gh-19-1-1329-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a892/11177843/f11236377e7e/gh-19-1-1329-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a892/11177843/c6ddba020fe4/gh-19-1-1329-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a892/11177843/58bc834e5687/gh-19-1-1329-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a892/11177843/a46152116bbb/gh-19-1-1329-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a892/11177843/0eedb6321494/gh-19-1-1329-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a892/11177843/f11236377e7e/gh-19-1-1329-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a892/11177843/c6ddba020fe4/gh-19-1-1329-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a892/11177843/58bc834e5687/gh-19-1-1329-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a892/11177843/a46152116bbb/gh-19-1-1329-g5.jpg

相似文献

1
Community-Based Strategies to Improve Health-Related Outcomes in People Living With Hypertension in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于社区的策略改善中低收入国家高血压患者健康相关结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Glob Heart. 2024 Jun 12;19(1):51. doi: 10.5334/gh.1329. eCollection 2024.
2
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.用于减少贫困和脆弱性的无条件现金转移:对低收入和中等收入国家卫生服务利用及健康结果的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 15;11(11):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub2.
3
Replacing salt with low-sodium salt substitutes (LSSS) for cardiovascular health in adults, children and pregnant women.用低钠盐替代物(LSSS)代替盐以促进成年人、儿童和孕妇的心血管健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 10;8(8):CD015207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015207.
4
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.无条件现金转移以减少贫困和脆弱性:对中低收入国家卫生服务利用和健康结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub3.
5
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in low- and middle-income countries.中低收入国家心血管疾病一级预防的多重危险因素干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 4;2015(8):CD011163. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011163.pub2.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
Topical repellents for malaria prevention.预防疟疾的局部用驱避剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 21;8(8):CD015422. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015422.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for prehypertension: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.高血压前期生活方式干预的比较效果:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Jun 21;23:101045. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101045. eCollection 2025 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainability of a 12-month lifestyle intervention delivered by community health workers in reducing blood pressure in Nepal: 5-year follow-up of the COBIN open-label, cluster randomised trial.社区卫生工作者实施的为期 12 个月的生活方式干预对降低尼泊尔血压的可持续性:COBIN 开放性标签、整群随机试验的 5 年随访。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Jul;11(7):e1086-e1095. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00214-0.
2
Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women's self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial.以妇女自助小组为主导的基于社区的教育和同伴支持对改善印度喀拉拉邦城市贫民窟高血压控制的效果:一项整群随机对照实用试验。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Nov;7(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010296.
3
Effect of a one-time financial incentive on linkage to chronic hypertension care in Kenya and Uganda: A randomized controlled trial.一次性财务激励对肯尼亚和乌干达慢性高血压患者护理衔接的影响:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 7;17(11):e0277312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277312. eCollection 2022.
4
Application of the research electronic data capture (REDCap) system in a low- and middle income country- experiences, lessons, and challenges.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)系统在低收入和中等收入国家的应用——经验、教训与挑战
Health Technol (Berl). 2021 Nov;11(6):1297-1304. doi: 10.1007/s12553-021-00600-3. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
5
Core health-components, contextual factors and program elements of community-based interventions in Southeast Asia - a realist synthesis regarding hypertension and diabetes.基于社区的干预措施在东南亚的核心健康要素、情境因素和项目要素 - 高血压和糖尿病的现实主义综合研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 22;21(1):1917. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11244-3.
6
Effectiveness of community-based health education and home support program to reduce blood pressure among patients with uncontrolled hypertension in Nepal: A cluster-randomized trial.基于社区的健康教育和家庭支持计划对降低尼泊尔未控制高血压患者血压的效果:一项整群随机试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 12;16(10):e0258406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258406. eCollection 2021.
7
Hypertension in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.中低收入国家的高血压问题。
Circ Res. 2021 Apr 2;128(7):808-826. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.318729. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
8
Health education interventions to promote health literacy in adults with selected non-communicable diseases living in low-to-middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.促进中低收入国家患有特定非传染性疾病的成年人健康素养的健康教育干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;27(6):1417-1428. doi: 10.1111/jep.13554. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
9
The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application.修订后的 Cochrane 随机对照试验偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)显示出较低的评分者间可靠性和应用方面的挑战。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
10
Community-based interventions for detection and management of diabetes and hypertension in underserved communities: a mixed-methods evaluation in Brazil, India, South Africa and the USA.在资源匮乏社区中开展基于社区的糖尿病和高血压检测与管理干预措施:在巴西、印度、南非和美国开展的一项混合方法评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001959.