Suppr超能文献

高流量鼻导管与传统氧疗预防肺切除手术患者术后低氧血症的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula with conventional oxygen therapy for preventing postoperative hypoxemia in patients with lung resection surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Xingxing, Li Xiaoqing, Li Yang, Wang Wenchun, Yu Yun

机构信息

Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2024 May 31;16(5):2906-2917. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1758. Epub 2024 May 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in patients extubated after lung resection surgery remains inconclusive. Our objective was to execute a meticulous systematic meta-analysis to accurately assess the advantages of HFNC compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT) for patients extubated after lung resection surgery, by examining postoperative hypoxemia and other patient-focused outcomes.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to July 2023. We employed the revised Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool (2.0) to evaluate the RoB of the included studies, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method to ascertain the certainty of the pooled effect estimates. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia.

RESULTS

Five RCTs (n=564) were included in the ultimate analysis. Utilizing HFNC rather than COT did not reduce the risk of postoperative hypoxemia [relative risk (RR), 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-1.49; low certainty]. Compared to COT, HFNC may significantly enhance oxygenation index within first 12 hours after extubation in patients with lung resection. There were no significant differences in reintubation rate (RR, 0.25; 95% CI: 0.04-1.54; high certainty), escalation of respiratory support (RR, 0.35; 95% CI: 0.11-1.08; high certainty), change in partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO) within first 24 hours after extubation, hospital length of stay [mean difference (MD), -0.19; 95% CI: -0.44 to 0.06; moderate certainty], and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (MD, 0.02; 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.19; high certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests that preemptive use of HFNC, instead of COT, in extubated patients following lung resection surgery may not significantly impact postoperative hypoxemia incidence, reintubation rate, escalation of respiratory support, postoperative PaCO difference, hospital and ICU length of stay. However, HFNC may significantly enhance the oxygenation index within the first 12 hours post-extubation following lung resection surgery. To verify the effect of HFNC on this population, additional large-scale, multicenter studies are essential.

摘要

背景

高流量鼻导管(HFNC)在肺切除手术后拔管患者中的疗效仍不明确。我们的目标是进行一项细致的系统荟萃分析,通过检查术后低氧血症和其他以患者为中心的结局,准确评估HFNC与传统氧疗(COT)相比在肺切除手术后拔管患者中的优势。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和Scopus,以识别从开始到2023年7月的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们采用修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险(RoB)工具(2.0)评估纳入研究的RoB,并采用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法确定合并效应估计值的确定性。主要结局是术后低氧血症的发生率。

结果

最终分析纳入了5项RCT(n = 564)。使用HFNC而非COT并未降低术后低氧血症的风险[相对风险(RR),0.67;95%置信区间(CI):0.30 - 1.49;低确定性]。与COT相比,HFNC可能显著提高肺切除患者拔管后12小时内的氧合指数。再插管率(RR,0.25;95% CI:0.04 - 1.54;高确定性)、呼吸支持升级(RR,0.35;95% CI:0.11 - 1.08;高确定性)、拔管后24小时内二氧化碳分压(PaCO)变化、住院时间[平均差(MD),-0.19;95% CI:-0.44至0.06;中度确定性]和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(MD,0.02;95% CI:-0.16至0.19;高确定性)方面无显著差异。

结论

我们的荟萃分析表明,在肺切除手术后拔管患者中,预防性使用HFNC而非COT可能不会显著影响术后低氧血症发生率﹑再插管率、呼吸支持升级、术后PaCO差异、住院和ICU住院时间。然而,HFNC可能会显著提高肺切除手术后拔管后12小时内的氧合指数。为验证HFNC对该人群的影响,有必要进行更多大规模、多中心研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb78/11170390/aeea2616de70/jtd-16-05-2906-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验