• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种药用植物(水苦荬和点地梅)叶绿体基因组的结构特征及其与近缘 Veronica 属物种的比较分析。

The chloroplast genomes of two medicinal species (Veronica anagallis-aquatica L. and Veronica undulata Wall.) and its comparative analysis with related Veronica species.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Dali University, Dali, 671000, China.

Key Laboratory of Yunnan Provincial Higher Education Institutions for Development of Yunnan Daodi Medicinal Materials Resources, Dali, 671000, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 17;14(1):13945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64896-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-64896-7
PMID:38886540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11183227/
Abstract

Veronica anagallis-aquatica L. and Veronica undulata Wall. are widely used ethnomedicinal plants in China. The two species have different clinical efficacies, while their extremely similar morphology and unclear interspecific relationship make it difficult to accurately identify them, leading to increased instances of mixed usage. This article reports on the complete chloroplast genomes sequence of these two species and their related Veronica species to conduct a comparative genomics analysis and phylogenetic construction. The results showed that the chloroplast (cp) genomes of Veronica exhibited typical circular quadripartite structures, with total lengths of 149,386 to 152,319 base pairs (bp), and GC content of 37.9 to 38.1%, and the number of genes was between 129-134. The total number of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in V. anagallis-aquatica and V. undulata is 37 and 36, while V. arvensis had the highest total number of 56, predominantly characterized by A/T single bases. The vast majority of long repeat sequence types are forward repeats and palindromic repeats. Selective Ka/Ks values showed that three genes were under positive selection. Sequence differences often occur in the non-coding regions of the large single-copy region (LSC) and small single-copy region (SSC), with the lowest sequence variation in the inverted repeat regions (IR). Seven highly variable regions (trnT-GGU-psbD, rps8-rpl16, trnQ-UUG, trnN-GUU-ndhF, petL, ycf3, and ycf1) were detected, which may be potential molecular markers for identifying V. anagallis-aquatica and V. undulata. The phylogenetic tree indicates that there is a close genetic relationship between the genera Veronica and Neopicrorhiza, and V. anagallis-aquatica and V. undulata are sister groups. The molecular clock analysis results indicate that the divergence time of Veronica may occur at ∼ 9.09 Ma, and the divergence time of these two species occurs at ∼ 0.48 Ma. It is speculated that climate change may be the cause of Veronica species diversity and promote the radiation of the genus. The chloroplast genome data of nine Veronica specie provides important insights into the characteristics and evolution of the chloroplast genome of this genus, as well as the phylogenetic relationships of the genus Veronica.

摘要

水苦荬和皱叶碎米荠是中国广泛应用于民间医学的两种植物。这两种植物具有不同的临床功效,但它们形态极其相似,种间关系不明确,难以准确识别,导致混合使用的情况增加。本文报道了这两种植物及其相关的婆婆纳属植物的完整叶绿体基因组序列,进行了比较基因组分析和系统发育构建。结果表明,婆婆纳属植物的叶绿体基因组呈典型的圆形四分体结构,总长度为 149386 到 152319 碱基对(bp),GC 含量为 37.9%到 38.1%,基因数量在 129 到 134 之间。水苦荬和皱叶碎米荠的简单序列重复(SSR)总数分别为 37 和 36,而婆婆纳属植物的 SSR 总数最高,为 56,主要以 A/T 单碱基为主。绝大多数长重复序列类型为正向重复和回文重复。选择的 Ka/Ks 值表明,有三个基因受到正选择。序列差异经常发生在大片段单拷贝区(LSC)和小片段单拷贝区(SSC)的非编码区,而反向重复区(IR)的序列变异最低。检测到七个高度可变区(trnT-GGU-psbD、rps8-rpl16、trnQ-UUG、trnN-GUU-ndhF、petL、ycf3 和 ycf1),它们可能是鉴定水苦荬和皱叶碎米荠的潜在分子标记。系统发育树表明,婆婆纳属和列当属之间存在密切的遗传关系,水苦荬和皱叶碎米荠是姐妹群。分子钟分析结果表明,婆婆纳属的分化时间约为 9.09Ma,而这两个种的分化时间约为 0.48Ma。推测气候变化可能是婆婆纳属物种多样性的原因,并促进了该属的辐射。九个婆婆纳属植物的叶绿体基因组数据为该属叶绿体基因组的特征和进化以及婆婆纳属的系统发育关系提供了重要的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/c442cfca7c05/41598_2024_64896_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/f69ef7e23e29/41598_2024_64896_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/f24dceafa06e/41598_2024_64896_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/722d1fd2a762/41598_2024_64896_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/0ae630f6b621/41598_2024_64896_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/eb657671361a/41598_2024_64896_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/e2b3e78d0b60/41598_2024_64896_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/f5c1d1efe71f/41598_2024_64896_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/51ee6f000847/41598_2024_64896_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/f70557d33f06/41598_2024_64896_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/01375620d687/41598_2024_64896_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/22c3db57650e/41598_2024_64896_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/c442cfca7c05/41598_2024_64896_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/f69ef7e23e29/41598_2024_64896_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/f24dceafa06e/41598_2024_64896_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/722d1fd2a762/41598_2024_64896_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/0ae630f6b621/41598_2024_64896_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/eb657671361a/41598_2024_64896_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/e2b3e78d0b60/41598_2024_64896_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/f5c1d1efe71f/41598_2024_64896_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/51ee6f000847/41598_2024_64896_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/f70557d33f06/41598_2024_64896_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/01375620d687/41598_2024_64896_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/22c3db57650e/41598_2024_64896_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172a/11183227/c442cfca7c05/41598_2024_64896_Fig12_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The chloroplast genomes of two medicinal species (Veronica anagallis-aquatica L. and Veronica undulata Wall.) and its comparative analysis with related Veronica species.两种药用植物(水苦荬和点地梅)叶绿体基因组的结构特征及其与近缘 Veronica 属物种的比较分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 17;14(1):13945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64896-7.
2
Thirteen complete chloroplast genomes of the costaceae family: insights into genome structure, selective pressure and phylogenetic relationships.十三份藜科植物完整的叶绿体基因组:对基因组结构、选择压力和系统发育关系的深入了解。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Jan 17;25(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-09996-4.
3
Complete chloroplast genome of Stephania tetrandra (Menispermaceae) from Zhejiang Province: insights into molecular structures, comparative genome analysis, mutational hotspots and phylogenetic relationships.浙江省头花千金藤(防己科)完整叶绿体基因组:分子结构、比较基因组分析、突变热点和系统发育关系的见解。
BMC Genomics. 2021 Dec 6;22(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08193-x.
4
Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence of : Genome Comparative Analysis and Phylogenetic Relationships among Acanthaceae.:叶绿体基因组全序列:旋花科植物基因组比较分析及系统发育关系。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Aug 6;2019:4370258. doi: 10.1155/2019/4370258. eCollection 2019.
5
Complete chloroplast genomes provide insights into evolution and phylogeny of Zingiber (Zingiberaceae).完整的叶绿体基因组为姜属(姜科)的进化和系统发育提供了新见解。
BMC Genomics. 2023 Jan 18;24(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09115-9.
6
Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of 10 Artemisia selengensis resources based on high-throughput sequencing.基于高通量测序的 10 份野生黄花蒿资源的叶绿体基因组的比较和系统发育分析。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Jun 5;25(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10455-3.
7
Complete chloroplast genomes of Zingiber montanum and Zingiber zerumbet: Genome structure, comparative and phylogenetic analyses.益智和莪术的完整叶绿体基因组:基因组结构、比较和系统发育分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 31;15(7):e0236590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236590. eCollection 2020.
8
Comparative genomics of four Liliales families inferred from the complete chloroplast genome sequence of Veratrum patulum O. Loes. (Melanthiaceae).从白花藜芦(Melanthiaceae)的完整叶绿体基因组序列推断出的四个百合科家族的比较基因组学。
Gene. 2013 Nov 10;530(2):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.07.100. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
9
Complete chloroplast genomes of eight Delphinium taxa (Ranunculaceae) endemic to Xinjiang, China: insights into genome structure, comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationships.中国新疆特有 8 种獐牙菜属(毛茛科)植物的完整叶绿体基因组:基因组结构、比较分析和系统发育关系的见解。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):600. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05279-y.
10
Comparative chloroplast genomes and phylogenetic relationships of Aglaonema modestum and five variegated cultivars of Aglaonema.Aglaonema modestum 及其五个花叶品种的叶绿体基因组比较及系统发育关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 2;17(9):e0274067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274067. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Hydrosols of SpeciesNatural Source of Free Volatile Compounds with Potential Pharmacological Interest.具有潜在药理活性的游离挥发性化合物天然来源物种的水溶胶。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Nov 9;15(11):1378. doi: 10.3390/ph15111378.
2
Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of and its phylogenomic inference in plantaginaceae.车前科某植物完整叶绿体基因组的特征分析及其系统发育推断
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2022 Nov 4;7(11):1928-1932. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2022.2139162. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Chloroplast Genomes in Three Medicinal Species for Bioexploration.
三种药用生物资源叶绿体基因组的比较基因组学与系统发育分析
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 11;23(20):12080. doi: 10.3390/ijms232012080.
4
Comparative and Phylogenetic Analyses of Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Complex (Scrophulariaceae).复杂玄参属(玄参科)植物叶绿体基因组全序列的比较和系统发育分析。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;13(10):1691. doi: 10.3390/genes13101691.
5
Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast Genomes in Five Species Endemic to China.五种中国特有物种的叶绿体基因组特征分析及比较
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 1;23(19):11617. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911617.
6
Plio-Pleistocene climatic change drives allopatric speciation and population divergence within the complex (Scrophulariaceae) of desert and steppe subshrubs in Northwest China.上新世-更新世气候变化驱动了中国西北沙漠和草原亚灌木复合体(玄参科)内的异域物种形成和种群分化。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Sep 21;13:985372. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.985372. eCollection 2022.
7
Complete chloroplast genomes of two medicinal Swertia species: the comparative evolutionary analysis of Swertia genus in the Gentianaceae family.两种药用獐牙菜属植物的完整叶绿体基因组:龙胆科獐牙菜属的比较进化分析。
Planta. 2022 Sep 9;256(4):73. doi: 10.1007/s00425-022-03987-z.
8
Comparative analyses of chloroplast genomes from Six Rhodiola species: variable DNA markers identification and phylogenetic relationships within the genus.六种红景天属植物叶绿体基因组的比较分析:可变 DNA 标记的鉴定与属内系统发育关系。
BMC Genomics. 2022 Aug 11;23(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08834-9.
9
Taxonomy, comparative genomics of Mullein (Verbascum, Scrophulariaceae), with implications for the evolution of Verbascum and Lamiales.毛地黄(玄参科,毛地黄属)的分类学、比较基因组学及其对毛地黄属和玄参目进化的影响。
BMC Genomics. 2022 Aug 8;23(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08799-9.
10
TimeTree 5: An Expanded Resource for Species Divergence Times.TimeTree 5:物种分化时间的扩展资源。
Mol Biol Evol. 2022 Aug 6;39(8). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac174.